Literature DB >> 19917860

Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.

Laurence Klotz1, Liying Zhang, Adam Lam, Robert Nam, Alexandre Mamedov, Andrew Loblaw.   

Abstract

PURPOSE We assessed the outcome of a watchful-waiting protocol with selective delayed intervention by using clinical prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or histologic progression as treatment indications for clinically localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a prospective, single-arm, cohort study. Patients were managed with an initial expectant approach. Definitive intervention was offered to those patients with a PSA doubling time of less than 3 years, Gleason score progression (to 4 + 3 or greater), or unequivocal clinical progression. Survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model were applied to the data. Results A total of 450 patients have been observed with active surveillance. Median follow-up was 6.8 years (range, 1 to 13 years). Overall survival was 78.6%. The 10-year prostate cancer actuarial survival was 97.2%. Overall, 30% of patients have been reclassified as higher risk and have been offered definitive therapy. Of 117 patients treated radically, the PSA failure rate was 50%, which was 13% of the total cohort. PSA doubling time of 3 years or less was associated with an 8.5-times higher risk of biochemical failure after definitive treatment compared with a doubling time of more than 3 years (P < .0001). The hazard ratio for nonprostate cancer to prostate cancer mortality was 18.6 at 10 years. CONCLUSION We observed a low rate of prostate cancer mortality. Among the patients who were reclassified as higher risk and who were treated, PSA failure was relatively common. Other-cause mortality accounted for almost all of the deaths. Additional studies are warranted to improve the identification of patients who harbor more aggressive disease despite favorable clinical parameters at diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19917860     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  341 in total

1.  [Patterns of care of patients with localized prostate cancer in Germany: a health care study with focus on active surveillance].

Authors:  F K H Chun; A Becker; L A Kluth; D Seiler; D Schnell; M Fisch; M Graefen; L Weissbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Management of low (favourable)-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Oguz Akin; Jonathan A Coleman; Sarah Crane; Mark Emberton; Larry Goldenberg; Hedvig Hricak; Mike W Kattan; John Kurhanewicz; Caroline M Moore; Chris Parker; Thomas J Polascik; Peter Scardino; Nicholas van As; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Association of prostate cancer risk alleles with unfavourable pathological characteristics in potential candidates for active surveillance.

Authors:  Barry B McGuire; Brian T Helfand; Shilajit Kundu; Qiaoyan Hu; Jessica A Banks; Phillip Cooper; William J Catalona
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Guidelines are too important to be left to clinical experts.

Authors:  Mattias Johansson; Pär Stattin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  [What can medicine expect from health economics?].

Authors:  E Bismarck; B J Schmitz-Dräger; O Schöffski
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Value of Tracking Biopsy in Men Undergoing Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Edward Chang; Tonye A Jones; Shyam Natarajan; Devi Sharma; Demetrios Simopoulos; Daniel J Margolis; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The role of PSA density to predict a pathological tumour upgrade between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy for low risk clinical prostate cancer in the modified Gleason system era.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Variation in serum prostate-specific antigen levels in men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance.

Authors:  Behfar Ehdaie; Bing Ying Poon; Daniel D Sjoberg; Pedro Recabal; Vincent Laudone; Karim Touijer; James Eastham; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.