Literature DB >> 25956480

Superior efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation with online contact force measurement persists after the learning period: a prospective case control study.

Michael Wolf1, Johan B Saenen, Wim Bories, Hielko P Miljoen, Sara Nullens, Christiaan J Vrints, Andrea Sarkozy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Use of online contact force (CF) measurement during circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (CPVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has demonstrated improvements in procedural parameters and mid-term clinical outcome. However, it is unknown if experience gained with CF measuring catheters improves the efficacy of subsequent CPVI procedures performed without CF measurement.
METHODS: This prospective trial compared procedural results of CPVI performed without a CF measuring catheter to a control group performed with a CF measuring catheter, by an operator with prior experience with CF technology..
RESULTS: Thirty-six eligible paroxysmal (n = 27) or persistent (n = 9) AF patients were consecutively enrolled. Twelve patients underwent CPVI with the non-CF catheter (CF- group) in a recall period and 24 with the CF catheter (CF+ group). After the first circumferential lesion set, the number of PV pairs requiring additional touch-up lesions to achieve electrical isolation was significantly less in the CF+ group (2 of 48 (4.2 %) vs. 7 of 24 (29.2 %) in the CF+ and CF- groups, respectively, p = 0.005). The procedure time was significantly lower in the CF+ group (117.9 ± 23.3 vs. 134.1 ± 25.3 min, p = 0.033). Radiofrequency (RF) and fluoroscopy time did not differ between groups (31.5 ± 7.1 vs. 31.8 ± 7.0 min and 11.8 ± 5.6 vs. 11.0 ± 5.8 min in the CF+ and the CF- group, respectively)
CONCLUSIONS: With the use of online CF measurement, PV isolation is more frequently complete following the first circumferential lesion set. A previous learning period with direct CF feedback is not a substitute for real-time direct CF measurement to maintain this advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25956480     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-015-0006-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  21 in total

1.  Electrode impedance: an indicator of electrode-tissue contact and lesion dimensions during linear ablation.

Authors:  X Zheng; G P Walcott; J A Hall; D L Rollins; W M Smith; G N Kay; R E Ideker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Changes in local wall thickness correlate with pathologic lesion size following radiofrequency catheter ablation: an intracardiac echocardiographic imaging study.

Authors:  J F Ren; D J Callans; D Schwartzman; J J Michele; F E Marchlinski
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.724

3.  Pulmonary vein isolation using "contact force" ablation: the effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation--a prospective study.

Authors:  Jason G Andrade; George Monir; Scott J Pollak; Paul Khairy; Marc Dubuc; Denis Roy; Mario Talajic; Marc Deyell; Léna Rivard; Bernard Thibault; Peter G Guerra; Stanley Nattel; Laurent Macle
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  The LETR-Principle: a novel method to assess electrode-tissue contact in radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  O J Eick; F H Wittkampf; T Bronneberg; B Schumacher
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-11

5.  The effects of electrode-tissue contact on radiofrequency lesion generation.

Authors:  B Avitall; K Mughal; J Hare; R Helms; D Krum
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study.

Authors:  Petr Neuzil; Vivek Y Reddy; Josef Kautzner; Jan Petru; Dan Wichterle; Dipen Shah; Hendrik Lambert; Aude Yulzari; Erik Wissner; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-03-20

7.  Relation between impedance and endocardial contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Authors:  S A Strickberger; V R Vorperian; K C Man; B D Williamson; S J Kalbfleisch; C Hasse; F Morady; J J Langberg
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study.

Authors:  Vivek Y Reddy; Dipen Shah; Josef Kautzner; Boris Schmidt; Nadir Saoudi; Claudia Herrera; Pierre Jaïs; Gerhard Hindricks; Petr Peichl; Aude Yulzari; Hendrik Lambert; Petr Neuzil; Andrea Natale; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  Mechanisms of pulmonary vein reconnection after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: the deterministic role of contact force and interlesion distance.

Authors:  Chan-Il Park; Heiko Lehrmann; Cornelius Keyl; Reinhold Weber; Jochen Schiebeling; Juergen Allgeier; Patrick Schurr; Ashok Shah; Franz-Josef Neumann; Thomas Arentz; Amir S Jadidi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-04-02

10.  Contact force sensing technology identifies sites of inadequate contact and reduces acute pulmonary vein reconnection: a prospective case control study.

Authors:  Shouvik Haldar; Julian W E Jarman; Sandeep Panikker; David G Jones; Tushar Salukhe; Dhiraj Gupta; Gareth Wynn; Wajid Hussain; Vias Markides; Tom Wong
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.164

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical experience with contact-force and flexible-tip ablation catheter designs.

Authors:  N Deubner; H Greiss; E Akkaya; A Berkowitsch; S Zaltsberg; C W Hamm; M Kuniss; T Neumann
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Impact of contact force technology on reducing the recurrence and major complications of atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xianhui Zhou; Wenkui Lv; Wenhui Zhang; Yuanzheng Ye; Yaodong Li; Qina Zhou; Qiang Xing; Jianghua Zhang; Yanmei Lu; Ling Zhang; Hongli Wang; Wen Qin; Baopeng Tang
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.596

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.