N Deubner1, H Greiss2, E Akkaya2, A Berkowitsch2, S Zaltsberg2, C W Hamm2, M Kuniss2, T Neumann2. 1. Electrophysiology Department, Kerckhoff Heart Centre, Benekestr. 2-6, 61231, Bad Nauheim, Germany. deubner@gmail.com. 2. Electrophysiology Department, Kerckhoff Heart Centre, Benekestr. 2-6, 61231, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Lesion formation is a critical determinant of technical and clinical success of pulmonary vein isolation. Different catheter designs aim to enhance tissue contact during ablation to enable optimized lesion formation. We analyzed procedural characteristics and predictors of clinical success in patients ablated with three different contemporary ablation catheters. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-eight sequentially included patients receiving pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with conventional (n = 122), contact-force (n = 96) and flexible-tip (n = 60) catheters were followed for a median of 14.1 months with 7d-Holter-monitoring and TTE at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Baseline characteristics and follow-up times were homogeneous across all groups. RESULTS: Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression for arrhythmia recurrence demonstrated a favorable hazard ratio for contact-force and flexible-tip catheters vs. conventional open irrigation catheters. Procedure time and fluoroscopy time were shorter for contact-force and flexible-tip catheters versus conventional catheters, but equal between. Linear lesions were applied in 58 % of contact-force and 66 % of flexible-tip cases, and CFAEs were targeted in 26 % of either. CONCLUSIONS: Our non-randomized prospectively collected data do not show a difference in observed procedure characteristics and in clinical outcome for flexible-tip versus contact-force catheter designs, while both display improved performance against conventional open irrigated-tip catheters. Linear lesions and CFAEs ablation were not associated with improved arrhythmia-free survival.
PURPOSE: Lesion formation is a critical determinant of technical and clinical success of pulmonary vein isolation. Different catheter designs aim to enhance tissue contact during ablation to enable optimized lesion formation. We analyzed procedural characteristics and predictors of clinical success in patients ablated with three different contemporary ablation catheters. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-eight sequentially included patients receiving pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with conventional (n = 122), contact-force (n = 96) and flexible-tip (n = 60) catheters were followed for a median of 14.1 months with 7d-Holter-monitoring and TTE at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Baseline characteristics and follow-up times were homogeneous across all groups. RESULTS: Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression for arrhythmia recurrence demonstrated a favorable hazard ratio for contact-force and flexible-tip catheters vs. conventional open irrigation catheters. Procedure time and fluoroscopy time were shorter for contact-force and flexible-tip catheters versus conventional catheters, but equal between. Linear lesions were applied in 58 % of contact-force and 66 % of flexible-tip cases, and CFAEs were targeted in 26 % of either. CONCLUSIONS: Our non-randomized prospectively collected data do not show a difference in observed procedure characteristics and in clinical outcome for flexible-tip versus contact-force catheter designs, while both display improved performance against conventional open irrigated-tip catheters. Linear lesions and CFAEs ablation were not associated with improved arrhythmia-free survival.
Authors: Petr Neuzil; Vivek Y Reddy; Josef Kautzner; Jan Petru; Dan Wichterle; Dipen Shah; Hendrik Lambert; Aude Yulzari; Erik Wissner; Karl-Heinz Kuck Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2013-03-20
Authors: F D'Ascenzo; A Corleto; G Biondi-Zoccai; M Anselmino; F Ferraris; L di Biase; A Natale; R J Hunter; R J Schilling; S Miyazaki; H Tada; K Aonuma; L Yenn-Jiang; H Tao; C Ma; D Packer; S Hammill; F Gaita Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Ethan M Balk; Ann C Garlitski; Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali; Teruhiko Terasawa; Mei Chung; Stanley Ip Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2010-11
Authors: Ross J Hunter; Thomas J Berriman; Ihab Diab; Ravindu Kamdar; Laura Richmond; Victoria Baker; Farai Goromonzi; Vinit Sawhney; Edward Duncan; Stephen P Page; Waqas Ullah; Beth Unsworth; Jamil Mayet; Mehul Dhinoja; Mark J Earley; Simon Sporton; Richard J Schilling Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2014-01-01
Authors: Hakan Oral; Christoph Scharf; Aman Chugh; Burr Hall; Peter Cheung; Eric Good; Srikar Veerareddy; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Shouvik Haldar; Julian W E Jarman; Sandeep Panikker; David G Jones; Tushar Salukhe; Dhiraj Gupta; Gareth Wynn; Wajid Hussain; Vias Markides; Tom Wong Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2012-12-04 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Gabriel Odozynski; Alexander Romeno Janner Dal Forno; Andrei Lewandowski; Hélcio Garcia Nascimento; André d'Avila Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 2.000