BACKGROUND: Contact force (CF) sensing technology allows real time CF measurement during catheter ablation. We hypothesised that the use of CF technology during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) would translate into lower acute pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: Symptomatic AF patients were treated in two groups, 'unblinded' and 'blinded', each containing 20 patients undergoing first time PVI. An irrigated radiofrequency CF sensing catheter was used in both groups. In the 'unblinded' group, the operator could view the CF value during mapping and ablation in real time. In the 'blinded group', the operator was 'blinded' to this information during the procedure, although the data were recorded. All 80 PVs were successfully isolated with exit and entrance block re-tested after 1h with adenosine. There was a significant association between blinding and the rate of acute PV reconnection. 17/80 (21%) of the PVs in the blinded subjects had a reconnection while 3/80 (4%) of the PVs in the unblinded subjects had a reconnection (p=0.001). Blinding the operator resulted in lower mean CF overall (11.6g (10.5, 12.9 g) vs. 14.4 g (13.3, 15.7 g); p=0.002). Sites where applied CF was significantly lower than others were usually the sites where reconnection occurred: these were the ridge between the left upper PV and appendage, and the right carina. CONCLUSIONS: CF data identified key areas where CF was poor. These were the areas of acute reconnection. Availability of real time CF information during PVI was associated with a significantly lower acute pulmonary vein reconnection rate.
BACKGROUND: Contact force (CF) sensing technology allows real time CF measurement during catheter ablation. We hypothesised that the use of CF technology during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) would translate into lower acute pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: Symptomatic AFpatients were treated in two groups, 'unblinded' and 'blinded', each containing 20 patients undergoing first time PVI. An irrigated radiofrequency CF sensing catheter was used in both groups. In the 'unblinded' group, the operator could view the CF value during mapping and ablation in real time. In the 'blinded group', the operator was 'blinded' to this information during the procedure, although the data were recorded. All 80 PVs were successfully isolated with exit and entrance block re-tested after 1h with adenosine. There was a significant association between blinding and the rate of acute PV reconnection. 17/80 (21%) of the PVs in the blinded subjects had a reconnection while 3/80 (4%) of the PVs in the unblinded subjects had a reconnection (p=0.001). Blinding the operator resulted in lower mean CF overall (11.6g (10.5, 12.9 g) vs. 14.4 g (13.3, 15.7 g); p=0.002). Sites where applied CF was significantly lower than others were usually the sites where reconnection occurred: these were the ridge between the left upper PV and appendage, and the right carina. CONCLUSIONS: CF data identified key areas where CF was poor. These were the areas of acute reconnection. Availability of real time CF information during PVI was associated with a significantly lower acute pulmonary vein reconnection rate.
Authors: Sven Knecht; Tobias Reichlin; Nikola Pavlovic; Beat Schaer; Stefan Osswald; Christian Sticherling; Michael Kühne Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; José Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: N Deubner; H Greiss; E Akkaya; A Berkowitsch; S Zaltsberg; C W Hamm; M Kuniss; T Neumann Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Giuseppe Stabile; Antonio De Simone; Francesco Solimene; Assunta Iuliano; Vincenzo La Rocca; Vincenzo Schillaci; Alfonso Panella; Gergana Shopova; Felice Nappi; Francesco Urraro; Giovanni Russo; Giovanni Napolitano; Paola Chiariello Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2015-04-30
Authors: Reza Wakili; Sebastian Clauss; Viola Schmidt; Michael Ulbrich; Anton Hahnefeld; Franziska Schüssler; Johannes Siebermair; Stefan Kääb; Heidi L Estner Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2013-10-06 Impact factor: 5.460