Literature DB >> 22820056

The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study.

Vivek Y Reddy1, Dipen Shah, Josef Kautzner, Boris Schmidt, Nadir Saoudi, Claudia Herrera, Pierre Jaïs, Gerhard Hindricks, Petr Peichl, Aude Yulzari, Hendrik Lambert, Petr Neuzil, Andrea Natale, Karl-Heinz Kuck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy of catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) remains limited by difficulty in achieving durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Suboptimal catheter tip-to-tissue contact force (CF) during lesion delivery is believed to reduce clinical efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between catheter CF during irrigated catheter ablation for AF and clinical recurrences during follow-up.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients with paroxysmal AF underwent PVI by using a radiofrequency ablation catheter with a CF sensor integrated at its tip, and they were followed for 12 months. The relationship between the CF and clinical outcomes was determined.
RESULTS: Acute PVI was achieved in 100% of the veins. Thirty-five percent (351 of 1017) of the applications were placed with an average CF of <10 g (low CF). All patients treated with an average CF of <10 g (5 of 5 patients) experienced recurrences, whereas 80% of the patients treated with an average CF of >20 g (8 of 10 patients) were free from AF recurrence at 12 months. The analysis of the average force-time integral showed that 75% of the patients treated with <500 gs were recurrent whereas only 31% of the patients treated with >1000 gs had recurrences at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The CF during catheter ablation for AF correlates with clinical outcome. Arrhythmia control is best achieved when ablation lesions are placed with an average CF of >20 g, and clinical failure is universally noted with an average CF of <10 g.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22820056     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  139 in total

1.  Lesion index: a novel guide in the path of successful pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Antonio Dello Russo; Gaetano M Fassini; Michela Casella; Elena Romanelli; Salvatore Pala; Stefania Riva; Valentina Catto; Massimo Moltrasio; Fabrizio Tundo; Martina Zucchetti; Benedetta Majocchi; Maria Antonietta Dessanai; Francesca Pizzamiglio; Giulia Vettor; Valentina Ribatti; Alessio Gasperetti; Selene Cellucci; Gabriele Negro; Rita Sicuso; Corrado Carbucicchio; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  General anesthesia improves contact force and reduces gap formation in pulmonary vein isolation: a comparison with conscious sedation.

Authors:  Akio Chikata; Takeshi Kato; Takanori Yaegashi; Satoru Sakagami; Chieko Kato; Takahiro Saeki; Keiichi Kawai; Shin-Ichiro Takashima; Hisayoshi Murai; Soichiro Usui; Hiroshi Furusho; Shuichi Kaneko; Masayuki Takamura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Contact force monitoring during catheter ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Ulrich Krause; David Backhoff; Sophia Klehs; Heike E Schneider; Thomas Paul
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  The importance of catheter stability evaluated by Visitag(TM) during pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Ryudo Fujiwara; Kimitake Imamura; Yoichi Kijima; Tomoya Masano; Ryoji Nagoshi; Amane Kohzuki; Hiroyuki Shibata; Yoshiro Tsukiyama; Ryo Takeshige; Kenichi Yanaka; Shinsuke Nakano; Yusuke Fukuyama; Junya Shite
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  THERMOCOOL® SMARTTOUCH® CATHETER - The Evidence So Far for Contact Force Technology and the Role of VISITAG™ MODULE.

Authors:  Tina Lin; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Roland Tilz
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-05-30

6.  Randomized comparison of contact force-guided versus conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation: prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of electrical reconnections and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Kohki Nakamura; Shigeto Naito; Takehito Sasaki; Masahiro Nakano; Kentaro Minami; Yosuke Nakatani; Kentaro Ikeda; Eiji Yamashita; Koji Kumagai; Nobusada Funabashi; Shigeru Oshima
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  High-voltage zones within the pulmonary vein antra: Major determinants of acute pulmonary vein reconnections after atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Koichi Nagashima; Ichiro Watanabe; Yasuo Okumura; Kazuki Iso; Keiko Takahashi; Ryuta Watanabe; Masaru Arai; Sayaka Kurokawa; Toshiko Nakai; Kimie Ohkubo; Shunichi Yoda; Atsushi Hirayama
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Which is the best catheter to perform atrial fibrillation ablation? A comparison between standard ThermoCool, SmartTouch, and Surround Flow catheters.

Authors:  Luigi Sciarra; Paolo Golia; Andrea Natalizia; Ermenegildo De Ruvo; Serena Dottori; Antonio Scarà; Alessio Borrelli; Lucia De Luca; Marco Rebecchi; Alessandro Fagagnini; Alberto Bandini; Fabrizio Guarracini; Marcello Galvani; Leonardo Calò
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Impact of real-time contact force and impedance measurement in pulmonary vein isolation procedures for treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Reza Wakili; Sebastian Clauss; Viola Schmidt; Michael Ulbrich; Anton Hahnefeld; Franziska Schüssler; Johannes Siebermair; Stefan Kääb; Heidi L Estner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 10.  Making better scar: Emerging approaches for modifying mechanical and electrical properties following infarction and ablation.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Holmes; Zachary Laksman; Lior Gepstein
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.667

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.