Literature DB >> 11141212

Electrode impedance: an indicator of electrode-tissue contact and lesion dimensions during linear ablation.

X Zheng1, G P Walcott, J A Hall, D L Rollins, W M Smith, G N Kay, R E Ideker.   

Abstract

Pre-ablation impedance was evaluated for its ability to detect electrode-tissue contact and allow creation of long uniform linear lesions with a multi-electrode ablation catheter. The study consisted of 2 parts, both of which used the in vivopig thigh muscle model. In part 1, a 7 Fr. multi-electrode catheter was held in 3 electrode-tissue contact conditions: (1) non-contact; (2) light contact with a 30g downward force; and (3) tight contact with a 90g downward force. Impedances were measured in unipolar, modified unipolar and bipolar configurations using a source with frequencies from 100Hz to 500kHz. Compared with non-contact, the impedance increased 35 +/- 22 % with 30g contact pressure and 68 +/- 40% when the contact pressure was increased to 90g across the range of frequencies studied. In part 2, the same catheter was held against the tissue with different forces. Pre-ablation impedance was measured using a 10kHz current. Phased radiofrequency energy was applied to the 5 electrodes simultaneously using 10W power at each electrode for 120s. A total of 32 linear lesions were created. The lesion dimensions correlated with pre-ablation impedance. A unipolar impedance > or = 190 Omega indicates 95% possibility to create a uniform linear lesion of at least 3mm depth with our ablation system. We conclude that pre-ablation impedance may be a useful indicator for predicting electrode-tissue contact and the ability to create a continuous and transmural linear lesion with a multi-electrode catheter.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11141212     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026586119600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  11 in total

1.  Temperature monitoring during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways.

Authors:  J J Langberg; H Calkins; R el-Atassi; M Borganelli; A Leon; S J Kalbfleisch; F Morady
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Radiofrequency catheter ablation: the effect of electrode size on lesion volume in vivo.

Authors:  J J Langberg; M A Lee; M C Chin; M Rosenqvist
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Interrelation of tissue temperature versus flow velocity in two different kinds of temperature controlled catheter radiofrequency energy applications.

Authors:  S Grumbrecht; J Neuzner; H F Pitschner
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Electrophysiological effects of long, linear atrial lesions placed under intracardiac ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  J E Olgin; J M Kalman; M Chin; C Stillson; M Maguire; P Ursel; M D Lesh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-10-21       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Tissue heating during radiofrequency catheter ablation: a thermodynamic model and observations in isolated perfused and superfused canine right ventricular free wall.

Authors:  D E Haines; D D Watson
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Right and left atrial radiofrequency catheter therapy of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; L Gencel; V Pradeau; S Garrigues; S Chouairi; M Hocini; P Le Métayer; R Roudaut; J Clémenty
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-12

7.  Inverse relationship between electrode size and lesion size during radiofrequency ablation with active electrode cooling.

Authors:  H Nakagawa; F H Wittkampf; W S Yamanashi; J V Pitha; S Imai; B Campbell; M Arruda; R Lazzara; W M Jackman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-08-04       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Comparison of in vivo tissue temperature profile and lesion geometry for radiofrequency ablation with a saline-irrigated electrode versus temperature control in a canine thigh muscle preparation.

Authors:  H Nakagawa; W S Yamanashi; J V Pitha; M Arruda; X Wang; K Ohtomo; K J Beckman; J H McClelland; R Lazzara; W M Jackman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Advance prediction of transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: importance of impedance in determining the success of low-energy shocks.

Authors:  R E Kerber; C Kouba; J Martins; K Kelly; R Low; R Hoyt; D Ferguson; L Bailey; P Bennett; F Charbonnier
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Radiofrequency catheter ablation guided by intracardiac echocardiography.

Authors:  E Chu; A P Fitzpatrick; M C Chin; K Sudhir; P G Yock; M D Lesh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  16 in total

1.  MEMS-Based Flexible Force Sensor for Tri-Axial Catheter Contact Force Measurement.

Authors:  Hardik J Pandya; Jun Sheng; Jaydev P Desai
Journal:  J Microelectromech Syst       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.417

2.  Simultaneous assessment of contact pressure and local electrical coupling index using robotic navigation.

Authors:  Antonio Dello Russo; Gaetano Fassini; Michela Casella; Fabrizio Bologna; Osama Al-Nono; Daniele Colombo; Viviana Biagioli; Pasquale Santangeli; Luigi Di Biase; Martina Zucchetti; Benedetta Majocchi; Vittoria Marino; Joseph J Gallinghouse; Andrea Natale; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Use of impedance-based catheter tip-to-tissue contact assessment (electroanatomic coupling index, ECI) in typical right atrial flutter ablation.

Authors:  Massimiliano Maines; Francesco Peruzza; Alessandro Zorzi; Domenico Catanzariti; Carlo Angheben; Maurizio Del Greco
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Superior efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation with online contact force measurement persists after the learning period: a prospective case control study.

Authors:  Michael Wolf; Johan B Saenen; Wim Bories; Hielko P Miljoen; Sara Nullens; Christiaan J Vrints; Andrea Sarkozy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Impact of real-time contact force and impedance measurement in pulmonary vein isolation procedures for treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Reza Wakili; Sebastian Clauss; Viola Schmidt; Michael Ulbrich; Anton Hahnefeld; Franziska Schüssler; Johannes Siebermair; Stefan Kääb; Heidi L Estner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Better Lesion Creation And Assessment During Catheter Ablation.

Authors:  Saurabh Kumar; Chirag R Barbhaiya; Samuel Balindger; Roy M John; Laurence M Epstein; Bruce A Koplan; Usha B Tedrow; William G Stevenson; Gregory F Michaud
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-10-31

Review 7.  The Role Of Contact Force In Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nakagawa; Warren M Jackman
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-06-30

8.  Contemporary Mapping Techniques of Complex Cardiac Arrhythmias - Identifying and Modifying the Arrhythmogenic Substrate.

Authors:  Emmanuel Koutalas; Sascha Rolf; Borislav Dinov; Sergio Richter; Arash Arya; Andreas Bollmann; Gerhard Hindricks; Philipp Sommer
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2015-03-10

9.  Remote magnetic versus manual catheters: evaluation of ablation effect in atrial fibrillation by myocardial marker levels.

Authors:  Eivind Solheim; Morten Kristian Off; Per Ivar Hoff; Alessandro De Bortoli; Peter Schuster; Ole-Jørgen Ohm; Jian Chen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Two Year, Single Center Clinical Outcome After Catheter Ablation For Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Guided by Lesion Index.

Authors:  Sri Sundaram; William Choe; J Ryan Jordan; Charles Boorman; Nate Mullins; Austin Davies; Austin Stucky; Sunil Nath
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.