Literature DB >> 25930157

Measurement of peak esophageal luminal cross-sectional area utilizing nadir intraluminal impedance.

A Zifan1, M Ledgerwood-Lee1, R K Mittal1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) is currently used to monitor gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal bolus clearance. We describe a novel methodology to measure maximal luminal cross-sectional area (CSA) during bolus transport from MII measurements.
METHODS: Studies were conducted in-vitro (test tubes) and in-vivo (healthy subjects). Concurrent MII, high resolution manometry, and intraluminal ultrasound (US) images were recorded 7-cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. Swallows with two concentrations of saline, 0.1 and 0.5 N, of bolus volumes 5, 10, and 15 cc were performed. The CSA was estimated by solving two algebraic Ohm's law equations, resulting from the two saline solutions. The CSA calculated from impedance method was compared with the CSA measured from the intraluminal US images. KEY
RESULTS: The CSA measured in duplicate from B-mode US images showed a mean difference between the two manual delineations to be near zero, and the repeatability coefficient was within 7.7% of the mean of the two CSA measurements. The calculated CSA from the impedance measurements strongly correlated with the US measured CSA (R(2) ≅ 0.98). A detailed statistical analysis of the impedance and US measured CSA data indicated that the 95% limits of agreement between the two methods ranged from -9.1 to 13 mm(2) . The root mean square error of the two measurements was 4.8% of the mean US-measured CSA. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: We describe a novel methodology to measure peak esophageal luminal CSA from the nadir impedance during peristalsis. Further studies are needed to determine if it is possible to measure patterns of luminal distension during peristalsis across the entire length of the esophagus from the MII recordings.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophageal cross-sectional area; esophageal distension; multichannel intraluminal impedance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25930157      PMCID: PMC4478210          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  19 in total

1.  Parallel conductance determination in cardiac volumetry using dilution manoeuvres: theoretical analysis and practical implications.

Authors:  M C Herrera; J M Olivera; M E Valentinuzzi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Patterns of gas and liquid reflux during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation: a study using intraluminal electrical impedance.

Authors:  D Sifrim; J Silny; R H Holloway; J J Janssens
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Dynamics of esophageal bolus transport in healthy subjects studied using multiple intraluminal impedancometry.

Authors:  H N Nguyen; J Silny; D Albers; E Roeb; C Gartung; G Rau; S Matern
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1997-10

4.  In vitro and finite-element model investigation of the conductance technique for measurement of aortic segmental volume.

Authors:  D A Hettrick; J H Battocletti; J J Ackmann; J H Linehan; D C Warltier
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Unexplained chest pain: the hypersensitive, hyperreactive, and poorly compliant esophagus.

Authors:  S S Rao; H Gregersen; B Hayek; R W Summers; J Christensen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Esophageal distension during bolus transport: can it be detected by intraluminal impedance recordings?

Authors:  J H Kim; R K Mittal; N Patel; M Ledgerwood; V Bhargava
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Shape, volume, and content of the deglutitive pharyngeal chamber imaged by ultrafast computerized tomography.

Authors:  G A Ergun; P J Kahrilas; S Lin; J A Logemann; J M Harig
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Failing deglutitive inhibition in primary esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  D Sifrim; J Janssens; G Vantrappen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  A wave of inhibition precedes primary peristaltic contractions in the human esophagus.

Authors:  D Sifrim; J Janssens; G Vantrappen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  9 in total

1.  Topographical plots of esophageal distension and contraction: effects of posture on esophageal peristalsis and bolus transport.

Authors:  Ali Zifan; Hyun Joo Song; Young-Hoon Youn; Xinhuan Qiu; Melissa Ledgerwood-Lee; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  Relationship between distension-contraction waveforms during esophageal peristalsis: effect of bolus volume, viscosity, and posture.

Authors:  Ravinder K Mittal; Kazumasa Muta; Melissa Ledgerwood-Lee; Ali Zifan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 3.  Distension contraction plots of pharyngeal/esophageal peristalsis: next frontier in the assessment of esophageal motor function.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Ali Zifan; Charles Cock; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.871

4.  Normative values of intra-bolus pressure and esophageal compliance based on 4D high-resolution impedance manometry.

Authors:  Wenjun Kou; Dustin A Carlson; Peter J Kahrilas; Neelesh A Patankar; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 3.960

5.  Esophageal contractions in type 3 achalasia esophagus: simultaneous or peristaltic?

Authors:  Tae Ho Kim; Nirali Patel; Melissa Ledgerwood-Lee; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.052

6.  Distension-contraction profile of peristalsis in patients with nutcracker esophagus.

Authors:  Ali Zifan; Kazumasa Muta; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Rhythmic contraction but arrhythmic distension of esophageal peristaltic reflex in patients with dysphagia.

Authors:  Kazumasa Muta; Ravinder K Mittal; Ali Zifan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Esophageal Bolus Domain Pressure and Peristalsis Associated With Experimental Induction of Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction.

Authors:  Wei-Yi Lei; Taher Omari; Tso-Tsai Liu; Ming-Wun Wong; Jui-Sheng Hung; Chih-Hsun Yi; Shu-Wei Liang; Charles Cock; Chien-Lin Chen
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

9.  Four-dimensional impedance manometry derived from esophageal high-resolution impedance-manometry studies: a novel analysis paradigm.

Authors:  Wenjun Kou; Dustin A Carlson; Neelesh A Patankar; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.409

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.