Literature DB >> 8624062

Unexplained chest pain: the hypersensitive, hyperreactive, and poorly compliant esophagus.

S S Rao1, H Gregersen, B Hayek, R W Summers, J Christensen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether neuromuscular dysfunction of the esophagus causes chest pain in patients in whom no disease is found on cardiac work-up, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour pH studies.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: 24 consecutive patients and 12 healthy controls. MEASUREMENTS: A new technique, impedance planimetry, was used to measure the sensory, motor, and biomechanical properties of the human esophagus. The impendance planimeter, which consists of a probe with four ring electrodes, three pressure sensors, and a balloon, simultaneously measures intraluminal pressure and cross-sectional areas. This allows calculation of the biomechanical variables of the esophageal wall.
RESULTS: Stepwise balloon distentions from 5 to 50 cm H2O induced a first sensation at a mean pressure (+/- SD) of 15 +/- 9 cm H2O in patients and 30 +/- 11 cm H2O in controls (P < 0.001). Moderate discomfort and pain were reported by 20 of 24 patients (83%) at 26 +/- 9 cm H2O and at 36 +/- 9 cm H2O, respectively, but by none of the controls (P < 0.001). Typical chest pain was reproduced in 20 of 24 patients (83%). In patients, the reactivity of the esophagus to balloon distention was greater (P = 0.01), the pressure elastic modulus was higher (P = 0.02), and the tension-strain association showed that the esophageal wall was less distensible (P = 0.02). Distention excited tertiary contractions and secondary peristalsis at a lower threshold of pressure (P = 0.05) and with a higher motility index in patients than in controls (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: In patients with chest pain and normal cardiac and esophageal evaluations, impedance planimetry of the esophagus reproduces pain and is associated with a 50% lower sensory threshold for pain, a 50% lower threshold for reactive contractions, and reduced esophageal compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8624062     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-11-199606010-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  39 in total

1.  Determination of biomechanical properties in guinea pig esophagus by means of high frequency ultrasound and impedance planimetry.

Authors:  J E Assentoft; H Gregersen; W D O'Brien
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Barostat or dynamic balloon distention test: which technique is best suited for esophageal sensory testing?

Authors:  J M Remes-Troche; A Attaluri; P Chahal; S S C Rao
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  Relationship between manometric findings and reported symptoms in nutcracker esophagus: insights gained from a review of 313 patients.

Authors:  Kazuto Tsuboi; Sumeet K Mittal; András Legner; Fumiaki Yano; Charles J Filipi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Noncardiac Chest Pain of Esophageal Origin.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-12

Review 5.  Application of the Functional Lumen Imaging Probe to Esophageal Disorders.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; Ikuo Hirano
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

Review 6.  Treatment of esophageal (noncardiac) chest pain: an expert review.

Authors:  Enrique Coss-Adame; Askin Erdogan; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Relevance of volume and proximal extent of reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  D Sifrim
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  New perspectives of studying gastrointestinal muscle function.

Authors:  Hans Gregersen; Donghua Liao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Hyperdynamic upper esophageal sphincter pressure: a manometric observation in patients reporting globus sensation.

Authors:  Monika A Kwiatek; Faiz Mirza; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Cardiac autonomic function and oesophageal acid sensitivity in patients with non-cardiac chest pain.

Authors:  G Tougas; R Spaziani; S Hollerbach; V Djuric; C Pang; A R Upton; E L Fallen; M V Kamath
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.