Literature DB >> 24861157

Esophageal distension during bolus transport: can it be detected by intraluminal impedance recordings?

J H Kim1, R K Mittal, N Patel, M Ledgerwood, V Bhargava.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophageal multiple intraluminal impedance (MII) measurement has been used to detect gastro-esophageal reflux and bolus transport. It is not clear if MII can detect changes in luminal cross sectional area (CSA) during bolus transport. Intraluminal ultrasound (US) images, MII, and high resolution manometry (HRM) were recorded simultaneously to determine temporal relationship between CSA and impedance during esophageal bolus transport and to define the relationship between peak distension and nadir impedance.
METHODS: Studies were conducted in five healthy subjects. MII, HRM, and US images were recorded 6 cm above LES. Esophageal distensions were studied during swallows and injections of 0.5 N saline bolus into the esophagus. KEY
RESULTS: Temporal change in esophageal CSA correlates with changes in impedance (r-value: mean ± SD = -0.80 ± 0.08, range: -0.94 to -0.66). Drop in impedance during distension occurs as a two-step process; initial large drop associated with onset of CSA increase, followed by a small drop during which majority of the CSA increase occurs. Peak CSA and nadir impedance occur within 1 s of each other. Increase in swallow and injection volumes increased the CSA, had no effect on large drop but increased the small drop amplitude. We observed a significant correlation between peak CSA and nadir impedance (r = -0.90, p < 0.001) and a better correlation between peak CSA and inverse impedance (r = 0.94, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Further studies are needed to confirm that intraluminal impedance recordings may be used to measure luminal CSA during esophageal bolus transport.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophageal cross-sectional area; esophageal distension; esophageal peristalsis; multiple intra luminal esophageal impedance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24861157      PMCID: PMC4107335          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  16 in total

1.  Measuring esophageal distension by high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound probe.

Authors:  Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jianmin Liu; James L Puckett; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  Synchrony between circular and longitudinal muscle contractions during peristalsis in normal subjects.

Authors:  Ravinder K Mittal; Bikram Padda; Vikas Bhalla; Valmik Bhargava; Jianmin Liu
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Assessment of intraluminal impedance for the detection of pharyngeal bolus flow during swallowing in healthy adults.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Nathalie Rommel; Michal M Szczesniak; Sergio Fuentealba; Philip G Dinning; Geoffrey P Davidson; Ian J Cook
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Dynamics of esophageal bolus transport in healthy subjects studied using multiple intraluminal impedancometry.

Authors:  H N Nguyen; J Silny; D Albers; E Roeb; C Gartung; G Rau; S Matern
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1997-10

5.  Susceptibility to dysphagia after fundoplication revealed by novel automated impedance manometry analysis.

Authors:  J C Myers; N Q Nguyen; G G Jamieson; J E Van't Hek; K Ching; R H Holloway; J Dent; T I Omari
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Upper esophageal sphincter impedance as a marker of sphincter opening diameter.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Lara Ferris; Eddy Dejaeger; Jan Tack; Dirk Vanbeckevoort; Nathalie Rommel
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.052

7.  Distension during gastroesophageal reflux: effects of acid inhibition and correlation with symptoms.

Authors:  Neelesh A Tipnis; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 4.052

8.  Failing deglutitive inhibition in primary esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  D Sifrim; J Janssens; G Vantrappen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Swallow induces a peristaltic wave of distension that marches in front of the peristaltic wave of contraction.

Authors:  L Abrahao; V Bhargava; A Babaei; A Ho; R K Mittal
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  Deglutitive inhibition, latency between swallow and esophageal contractions and primary esophageal motor disorders.

Authors:  Daniel Sifrim; Jafar Jafari
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 4.924

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Impedance as an adjunct to manometric testing to investigate symptoms of dysphagia: What it has failed to do and what it may tell us in the future.

Authors:  T Omari; J Tack; N Rommel
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Measurement of peak esophageal luminal cross-sectional area utilizing nadir intraluminal impedance.

Authors:  A Zifan; M Ledgerwood-Lee; R K Mittal
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Topographical plots of esophageal distension and contraction: effects of posture on esophageal peristalsis and bolus transport.

Authors:  Ali Zifan; Hyun Joo Song; Young-Hoon Youn; Xinhuan Qiu; Melissa Ledgerwood-Lee; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 4.  Esophageal function testing: beyond manometry and impedance.

Authors:  Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08-01

5.  High-resolution impedance manometry parameters enhance the esophageal motility evaluation in non-obstructive dysphagia patients without a major Chicago Classification motility disorder.

Authors:  D A Carlson; T Omari; Z Lin; N Rommel; K Starkey; P J Kahrilas; J Tack; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Relationship between distension-contraction waveforms during esophageal peristalsis: effect of bolus volume, viscosity, and posture.

Authors:  Ravinder K Mittal; Kazumasa Muta; Melissa Ledgerwood-Lee; Ali Zifan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 7.  Oesophageal dysphagia: manifestations and diagnosis.

Authors:  Frank Zerbib; Taher Omari
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Modulation of Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES) Relaxation and Opening During Volume Swallowing.

Authors:  Charles Cock; Corinne A Jones; Michael J Hammer; Taher I Omari; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Cholecystokinin induces esophageal longitudinal muscle contraction and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in healthy humans.

Authors:  Arash Babaei; Ravinder Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.052

10.  Esophageal contractions in type 3 achalasia esophagus: simultaneous or peristaltic?

Authors:  Tae Ho Kim; Nirali Patel; Melissa Ledgerwood-Lee; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.052

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.