Literature DB >> 35661346

Normative values of intra-bolus pressure and esophageal compliance based on 4D high-resolution impedance manometry.

Wenjun Kou1, Dustin A Carlson1, Peter J Kahrilas1, Neelesh A Patankar2, John E Pandolfino1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to quantify normative values of phase-specific intra-bolus pressure (IBP) and esophageal distensibility using 4D analysis of high-resolution-impedance manometry (HRIM).
METHODS: HRIM studies of supine swallows from 34 normal controls were analyzed with respect to the four phases of bolus transit: (1) accommodation, (2) compartmentalization, (3) peristalsis/esophageal emptying, and (4) ampullary emptying. Phase-specific IBP, bolus volume, and distensibility index (DI) in the esophageal body and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) during phases 1-3 were extracted.
RESULTS: The median (5-95th/IQR) IBP values were as follows: phase 1: 4.0 (-2.0-10.4/1.9-5.8) mmHg, phase 2: 5.7 (0.2-14.1/3.6-8.9) mmHg, and phase 3: 11.2 (2.9-19.4/7.7-15.1) mmHg. The median bolus volume calculated by integrating impedance planimetry cross-sectional areas was 4.1 ml during the compartmentalization phase. The EGJ-DI at max EGJ diameter during phase 2 and 3 was 2.8 (1.1-9.5/1.8-3.7) mm2 /mmHg and 6.0 (3.2-20.3/5.1-7.8) mm2 /mmHg, respectively. The phase 3 EGJ-DI values (6.0 (3.2-20.3/5.1-7.8) mm2 /mmHg) were similar to those calculated using functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) at the 60 ml volume on the same subjects (5.8 [3.5-7.2/5.0-6.4] mm2 /mmHg). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: 4D-HRIM provides a standardized methodology to track the nadir impedance and provide measurements of IBP during maximal distention across phases 1-3 of bolus transit. Median IBP and delta IBP were different across the phases, supporting the need to define IBP by phase. Additionally, the EGJ-DI calculated during phase 3 was similar to the 60-ml EGJ-DI from FLIP in the same subjects suggesting that 4D-HRIM can quantify EGJ opening during primary peristalsis.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body compliance; distensibility index; intra-bolus pressure; intraluminal impedance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35661346      PMCID: PMC9529819          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.960


  20 in total

1.  Measuring EGJ opening patterns using high resolution intraluminal impedance.

Authors:  J E Pandolfino; G Shi; Q Zhang; S Ghosh; J G Brasseur; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Measurement of peak esophageal luminal cross-sectional area utilizing nadir intraluminal impedance.

Authors:  A Zifan; M Ledgerwood-Lee; R K Mittal
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  The four phases of esophageal bolus transit defined by high-resolution impedance manometry and fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Zhiyue Lin; Brandon Yim; Andrew Gawron; Hala Imam; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Automated impedance manometry analysis as a method to assess esophageal function.

Authors:  N Rommel; L Van Oudenhove; J Tack; T I Omari
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Susceptibility to dysphagia after fundoplication revealed by novel automated impedance manometry analysis.

Authors:  J C Myers; N Q Nguyen; G G Jamieson; J E Van't Hek; K Ching; R H Holloway; J Dent; T I Omari
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Inter-rater agreement of novel high-resolution impedance manometry metrics: Bolus flow time and esophageal impedance integral ratio.

Authors:  D A Carlson; Z Lin; W Kou; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Assessing bolus retention in achalasia using high-resolution manometry with impedance: a comparator study with timed barium esophagram.

Authors:  Yu K Cho; Anna M Lipowska; Frédéric Nicodème; Ezra N Teitelbaum; Eric S Hungness; Elyse R Johnston; Andrew Gawron; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Perception of dysphagia: lack of correlation with objective measurements of esophageal function.

Authors:  A Lazarescu; G Karamanolis; L Aprile; R B De Oliveira; R Dantas; D Sifrim
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  Four-dimensional impedance manometry derived from esophageal high-resolution impedance-manometry studies: a novel analysis paradigm.

Authors:  Wenjun Kou; Dustin A Carlson; Neelesh A Patankar; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.409

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.