Literature DB >> 25749977

In vitro evaluation of an ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) device.

Shaun D Gregory1,2, Helena Cooney3, Sara Diab4,5, Chris Anstey6,7, Ogilvie Thom8, John F Fraser9,10.   

Abstract

Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring techniques provide high yield, low risk mechanisms to identify and individually treat shock in the emergency setting. The non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) device uses an ultrasound probe applied externally to the chest; however limitations exist with previous validation strategies. This study presents the in vitro validation of the USCOM device against calibrated flow sensors and compares user variability in simulated healthy and septic conditions. A validated mock circulation loop was used to simulate each condition with a range of cardiac outputs (2-10 l/min) and heart rates (50-95 bpm). Three users with varying degrees of experience using the USCOM device measured cardiac output and heart rate by placing the ultrasound probe on the mock aorta. Users were blinded to the condition, heart rate and cardiac output which were randomly generated. Results were reported as linear regression slope (β). All users estimated heart rate in both conditions with reasonable accuracy (β = 0.86-1.01), while cardiac output in the sepsis condition was estimated with great precision (β = 1.03-1.04). Users generally overestimated the cardiac output in the healthy simulation (β = 1.07-1.26) and reported greater difficulty estimating reduced cardiac output compared with higher values. Although there was some variability between users, particularly in the healthy condition (P < 0.01), all estimations were within a clinically acceptable range. In this study the USCOM provided a suitable measurement of cardiac output and heart rate when compared with our in vitro system. It is a promising technique to assist with the identification and treatment of shock.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac output; Mock circulation loop; USCOM

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25749977     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9685-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  25 in total

1.  A compact mock circulation loop for the in vitro testing of cardiovascular devices.

Authors:  Daniel L Timms; Shaun D Gregory; Nicholas A Greatrex; Mark J Pearcy; John F Fraser; Ulrich Steinseifer
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.094

2.  Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Rajesh Chand; Yatin Mehta; Naresh Trehan
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit.

Authors:  H L Tan; M Pinder; R Parsons; B Roberts; P V van Heerden
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  The patient with shock: is there any role for the non-invasive monitoring of cardiac output?

Authors:  Stephen Bernard
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Cardiac output estimation after off-pump coronary artery bypass: a comparison of two different techniques.

Authors:  Dheeraj Arora; Rajesh Chand; Yatin Mehta; Naresh Trehan
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2007-07

6.  Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter.

Authors:  O Thom; D M Taylor; R E Wolfe; J Cade; P Myles; H Krum; R Wolfe
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 7.  A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM).

Authors:  S W Chong; P J Peyton
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs.

Authors:  Lester A Critchley; Zhi Y Peng; Benny S Fok; Anna Lee; Robert A Phillips
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients.

Authors:  L E M van Lelyveld-Haas; A R H van Zanten; G F Borm; D H T Tjan
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Nexfin noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring: validation against continuous pulse contour and intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution derived cardiac output in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Koen Ameloot; Katrijn Van De Vijver; Ole Broch; Niels Van Regenmortel; Inneke De Laet; Karen Schoonheydt; Hilde Dits; Berthold Bein; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-11-11
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2016 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A Critchley; Steffen Rex; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Reliability of thermodilution derived cardiac output with different operator characteristics.

Authors:  Scott C McKenzie; Kimble Dunster; Wandy Chan; Martin R Brown; David G Platts; George Javorsky; Chris Anstey; Shaun D Gregory
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  [Application of ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in evaluation of cardiac function in children with severe pneumonia].

Authors:  Juan Fan; Zhi-Ying Chen; Peng-Yuan Chen; Chang-Hui Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2016-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.