Literature DB >> 22928650

A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM).

S W Chong1, P J Peyton.   

Abstract

The ultrasonic cardiac output monitor is a non-invasive, continuous-wave Doppler monitor that can be used to measure cardiac output. Its accuracy and precision in peri-operative and critical care has been assessed with varied results. We conducted a meta-analysis to calculate a pooled mean bias, precision and percentage error for this device. Six studies were suitable for inclusion into a pooled parametric analysis consisting of 320 measurements. The mean weighted bias was -0.39 l.min(-1) (95% CI -0.25 to -0.53 l.min(-1) ), precision 1.27 l.min(-1) and percentage error 42.7% (95% CI 38.5-46.9%). The ultrasonic cardiac output monitor achieved similar agreement with bolus thermodilution to that of other minimally invasive methods of peri-operative cardiac output monitoring, and may have a useful role in cardiac output monitoring. Anaesthesia
© 2012 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22928650     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07311.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  27 in total

1.  Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies?

Authors:  Huang Li; Lester A H Critchley; Jie Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Sanders; S Servaas; C Slagt
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  In vitro evaluation of an ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) device.

Authors:  Shaun D Gregory; Helena Cooney; Sara Diab; Chris Anstey; Ogilvie Thom; John F Fraser
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  A framework for the meta-analysis of Bland-Altman studies based on a limits of agreement approach.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tipton; Jonathan Shuster
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  USCOM-window to the circulation: utility of supra-sternal Doppler in an elderly anaesthetized patient for a robotic cystectomy.

Authors:  Lester A H Critchley; Li Huang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Measurement of Cardiac Output Using an Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM) in Patients with Single-Ventricle Physiology.

Authors:  Wonshill Koh; Kristin A Schneider; Huaiyu Zang; Sarosh P Batlivala; Matthew P Monteleone; Alexis L Benscoter; Meghan M Chlebowski; Ilias D Iliopoulos; David S Cooper
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 1.838

Review 7.  Advances in monitoring and management of shock.

Authors:  Haifa Mtaweh; Erin V Trakas; Erik Su; Joseph A Carcillo; Rajesh K Aneja
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.278

8.  [Application of ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in evaluation of cardiac function in children with severe pneumonia].

Authors:  Juan Fan; Zhi-Ying Chen; Peng-Yuan Chen; Chang-Hui Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2016-09

9.  Agreement between continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution for cardiac output measurement in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karim Kouz; Frederic Michard; Alina Bergholz; Christina Vokuhl; Luisa Briesenick; Phillip Hoppe; Moritz Flick; Gerhard Schön; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Temporal haemodynamic changes after bisoprolol treatment in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Authors:  Weiwei Zeng; Brian Tomlinson
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.