Literature DB >> 28281192

Reliability of thermodilution derived cardiac output with different operator characteristics.

Scott C McKenzie1,2, Kimble Dunster3, Wandy Chan1,2, Martin R Brown1,2, David G Platts1,2,3, George Javorsky2, Chris Anstey1,4, Shaun D Gregory5,6,7.   

Abstract

Cardiac output (CO) is commonly measured using the thermodilution technique at the time of right heart catheterisation (RHC). However inter-operator variability, and the operator characteristics which may influence that, has not been quantified. Therefore, this study aimed to assess inter-operator variability with the thermodilution technique using a mock circulation loop (MCL) with calibrated flow sensors. Participants were blinded and asked to determine 4 levels of CO using the thermodilution technique, which was compared with the MCL calibrated flow sensors. The MCL was used to randomly generate CO between 3.0 and 7.0 L/min through changes in heart rate, contractility and vascular resistance with a RHC inserted through the MCL pulmonary artery. Participant characteristics including gender, specialty, age, height, weight, body-mass index, grip strength and RHC experience were recorded and compared to determine their relationship with CO measurement accuracy. In total, there were 15 participants, made up of consultant cardiologists (6), advanced trainees in cardiology (5) and intensive care consultants (4). The majority (9) had performed 26-100 previous RHCs, while 4 had performed more than 100 RHCs. Compared to the MCL-measured CO, participants overestimated CO using the thermodilution technique with a mean difference of +0.75 ± 0.71 L/min. The overall r2 value for actual vs measured CO was 0.85. The difference between MCL and thermodilution derived CO declined significantly with increasing RHC experience (P < 0.001), increasing body mass index (P < 0.001) and decreasing grip strength (P = 0.033). This study demonstrated that the thermodilution technique is a reasonable method to determine CO, and that operator experience was the only participant characteristic related to CO measurement accuracy. Our results suggest that adequate exposure to, and training in, the thermodilution technique is required for clinicians who perform RHC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac output; Clinical measurements; Measurement precision; Pulmonary artery catheterisation; Thermodilution

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28281192     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-017-0010-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  21 in total

Review 1.  Pulmonary artery blood temperature and the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution.

Authors:  S F Moise; C J Sinclair; D H T Scott
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  The effects of valvular regurgitation on thermodilution ejection fraction measurements.

Authors:  F G Spinale; R Mukherjee; R Tanaka; M R Zile
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  A compact mock circulation loop for the in vitro testing of cardiovascular devices.

Authors:  Daniel L Timms; Shaun D Gregory; Nicholas A Greatrex; Mark J Pearcy; John F Fraser; Ulrich Steinseifer
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.094

4.  Comparison of thermodilution and Fick methods for measurement of cardiac output in tricuspid regurgitation.

Authors:  T Konishi; Y Nakamura; I Morii; Y Himura; T Kumada; C Kawai
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Researches on the Circulation Time and on the Influences which affect it.

Authors:  G N Stewart
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1897-11-20       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Lack of agreement between thermodilution and fick methods in the measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  Peter Baylor
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.510

7.  Comparison of the Fick and dye injection methods of measuring the cardiac output in man.

Authors:  W F HAMILTON; R L RILEY
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1948-05-01

8.  Comparison between mixed venous oxygen saturation and thermodilution cardiac output in monitoring patients with severe heart failure treated with milrinone and dobutamine.

Authors:  S Nuñez; A Maisel
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Central venous blood temperature fluctuations and thermodilution signal processing in dogs.

Authors:  R W Johnson; R A Normann
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Underestimation of cardiac output by thermodilution in patients with tricuspid regurgitation.

Authors:  R G Cigarroa; R A Lange; R H Williams; J B Bedotto; L D Hillis
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  4 in total

1.  Letter to the editor in response to "Agreement between continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution for cardiac output measurement in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis".

Authors:  Fellery de Lange; Inge T Bootsma; E Christiaan Boerma
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 2.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Moritz Flick; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  The contemporary pulmonary artery catheter. Part 2: measurements, limitations, and clinical applications.

Authors:  I T Bootsma; E C Boerma; T W L Scheeren; F de Lange
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Electrochemical Approach to Measure Physiological Fluid Flow Rates.

Authors:  Srivats Sarathy; Marco A Nino; Abdulsattar H Ghanim; Srinivasan Rajagopal; Syed Mubeen; M L Raghavan
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.545

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.