Literature DB >> 18358581

What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a qualitative study.

Alison Chapple1, Sue Ziebland, Paul Hewitson, Ann McPherson.   

Abstract

Screening can reduce bowel cancer mortality. The UK National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (NHS BCSP), using the Faecal Occult Blood test (FOBt), is being introduced over three years in the UK, but in some areas uptake is disappointing. We sought to understand why some people decided to participate in screening for bowel cancer while others did not. Interviews were conducted with 44 men and women invited for screening. Most had decided to take part, some were reluctant, and a few had declined to participate. We aimed for a maximum variation sample. Reasons for accepting screening included: knowing someone with cancer, previous positive experience of women's screening programmes, being a "good citizen", previous bowel problems, and encouragement from others. Reasons for reluctance to take part included: feeling healthy, fear of outcome, lack of time, disgust at the idea of handling stools, concern about posting samples in the mail, misunderstanding instructions, and past (negative) experience or fear of colonoscopy. Theoretical models of health behaviours do not mention the sense of civic responsibility that encourages people to avert (later) costs to the NHS. This may be a particular feature of a socialized health system. Our results also suggest that people might feel more inclined to accept screening if they had current information about patients' experiences of colonoscopy and treatment for early bowel cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18358581     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  45 in total

1.  Cancer fatalism and poor self-rated health mediate the association between socioeconomic status and uptake of colorectal cancer screening in England.

Authors:  Anne Miles; Sandra Rainbow; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Reasons for non-response to a direct-mailed FIT kit program: lessons learned from a pragmatic colorectal-cancer screening study in a federally sponsored health center.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer J Sanchez; Amanda F Petrik; Beverly Green
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Disgusted, embarrassed, annoyed: affective associations relate to uptake of colonoscopy screening.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Lina Jandorf; Deborah O Erwin
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2014-08

4.  Advantages of wordless instructions on how to complete a fecal immunochemical test: lessons from patient advisory council members of a federally qualified health center.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jen Sanchez; Amanda Petrik; Tanya Kapka; Jen DeVoe; Beverly Green
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  The Effects of the Nurse Navigation Program in Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Elif Temucin; Nursen O Nahcivan
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Institutional (mis)trust in colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study with Greek, Iranian, Anglo-Australian and Indigenous groups.

Authors:  Paul R Ward; Cushla Coffey; Sara Javanparast; Carlene Wilson; Samantha B Meyer
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Cancer survivors: familial risk perception and management advice given to their relatives.

Authors:  Francois Eisinger; Anne Deborah Bouhnik; Laetitia Malavolti; Anne Gaelle Le Corroller-Soriano; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Influences on the uptake of diabetes screening: a qualitative study in primary care.

Authors:  Helen Eborall; Margaret Stone; Navneet Aujla; Nicholas Taub; Melanie Davies; Kamlesh Khunti
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England.

Authors:  C von Wagner; A Good; D Wright; B Rachet; A Obichere; S Bloom; J Wardle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Responses to procedural information about colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: the role of consideration of future consequences.

Authors:  Christian von Wagner; Anna Good; Samuel G Smith; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.