Literature DB >> 35346927

Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff.

Melinda M Davis1, Jennifer L Schneider2, Amanda F Petrik2, Edward J Miech3, Brittany Younger4, Anne L Escaron4, Jennifer S Rivelli2, Jamie H Thompson2, Denis Nyongesa2, Gloria D Coronado2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) programs can facilitate colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We sought to identify modifiable, clinic-level factors that distinguish primary care clinics with higher vs lower FIT completion rates in response to a centralized mailed FIT program.
METHODS: We used baseline observational data from 15 clinics within a single urban federally qualified health center participating in a pragmatic trial to optimize a mailed FIT program. Clinic-level data included interviews with leadership using a guide informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and FIT completion rates. We used template analysis to identify explanatory factors and configurational comparative methods to identify specific combinations of clinic-level conditions that uniquely distinguished clinics with higher and lower FIT completion rates.
RESULTS: We interviewed 39 clinic leaders and identified 58 potential explanatory factors representing clinic workflows and the CFIR inner setting domain. Clinic-level FIT completion rates ranged from 30% to 56%. The configurational model for clinics with higher rates (≥37%) featured any 1 of the following 3 factors related to support staff: (1) adding back- or front-office staff in past 12 months, (2) having staff help patients resolve barriers to CRC screening, and (3) having staff hand out FITs/educate patients. The model for clinics with lower rates involved the combined absence of these same 3 factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Three factors related to support staff differentiated clinics with higher and lower FIT completion rates. Adding nonphysician support staff and having those staff provide enabling services might help clinics optimize mailed FIT screening programs.
© 2022 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; configurational comparative methods; fecal immunochemical testing; federally qualified health center; mailed FIT; practice-based research; pragmatic trial; primary health care; screening; support staff

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35346927      PMCID: PMC8959740          DOI: 10.1370/afm.2772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  55 in total

1.  Evaluating Two Evidence-Based Intervention Strategies to Promote CRC Screening Among Latino Adults in a Primary Care Setting.

Authors:  Sheila F Castañeda; Balambal Bharti; Rebeca Aurora Espinoza-Giacinto; Valerie Sanchez; Shawne O'Connell; Fatima Muñoz; Sylvia Mercado; Marie Elena Meza; Wendy Rojas; Gregory A Talavera; Samir Gupta
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-06-20

2.  Implementation successes and challenges in participating in a pragmatic study to improve colon cancer screening: perspectives of health center leaders.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jennifer L Schneider; Amanda Petrik; Jennifer Rivelli; Stephen Taplin; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer Prevention (PROMPT): Study protocol for a pragmatic trial.

Authors:  Jamie H Thompson; Melinda M Davis; Michael C Leo; Jennifer L Schneider; David H Smith; Amanda F Petrik; Melissa Castillo; Brittany Younger; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Positioning Medical Assistants for a Greater Role in the Era of Health Reform.

Authors:  Susan A Chapman; Angela Marks; Catherine Dower
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Burnout and Health Care Workforce Turnover.

Authors:  Rachel Willard-Grace; Margae Knox; Beatrice Huang; Hali Hammer; Coleen Kivlahan; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Initiation of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Enrollees.

Authors:  Cynthia M Mojica; Savannah M Bradley; Bonnie K Lind; Yifan Gu; Gloria D Coronado; Melinda M Davis
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Colorectal cancer screening in newly insured Medicaid members: a review of concurrent federal and state policies.

Authors:  Meghan C O'Leary; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Yifan Gu; Stephanie B Wheeler; Gloria D Coronado; Sarah E Bartelmann; Bonnie K Lind; Maria E Mayorga; Melinda M Davis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy and COVID-19: Avoiding More Casualties.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; David Lieberman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  School-based self-management interventions for asthma in children and adolescents: a mixed methods systematic review.

Authors:  Katherine Harris; Dylan Kneale; Toby J Lasserson; Vanessa M McDonald; Jonathan Grigg; James Thomas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-28

10.  Health plan adaptations to a mailed outreach program for colorectal cancer screening among Medicaid and Medicare enrollees: the BeneFIT study.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jennifer L Schneider; Beverly B Green; Jennifer K Coury; Malaika R Schwartz; Yogini Kulkarni-Sharma; Laura Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.