OBJECTIVE: To examine patient and provider barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among mid-Atlantic Latinos seeking care at urban primary care clinics and describe implications for the design of interventions in primary care. DESIGN AND METHOD: Nine focus groups were conducted with 70 Latino patients and 27 primary care providers. Content analysis of focus group transcripts was performed using established qualitative techniques. RESULTS: Comments on CRC screening fell into 10 content areas: primary care site or provider characteristics (25% patient/21% provider comments); knowledge (18% patient/12% provider comments); cost/insurance coverage (10%/25%); attitudes (14%/7%); ordering of priorities (10%/11%); language (12%/7%); procedural issues regarding screenings (8%/10%); discrimination (2%/1%); and issues related to being a new immigrant (.2%/6%). Patient lack of understanding of the screening test procedures, inadequate knowledge about colorectal cancer, inadequate numbers of Spanish-speaking providers, and the cost of screening were most often cited as barriers by patients. Both providers and patients repeatedly mentioned the lack of funding and referral sources for colonoscopy as a key barrier to performing screening, even with lower-cost fecal occult blood tests, as colonoscopy follow-up would not be available. Patients favored receiving CRC screening recommendations from their usual continuity physician, but were open to receiving information on test procedures and indications from a Spanish-speaking health educator. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to improve funding and availability of colonoscopy for low-income persons could proceed in tandem with linguistically and culturally appropriate clinic-based efforts to improve CRC screening among Latinos.
OBJECTIVE: To examine patient and provider barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among mid-Atlantic Latinos seeking care at urban primary care clinics and describe implications for the design of interventions in primary care. DESIGN AND METHOD: Nine focus groups were conducted with 70 Latino patients and 27 primary care providers. Content analysis of focus group transcripts was performed using established qualitative techniques. RESULTS: Comments on CRC screening fell into 10 content areas: primary care site or provider characteristics (25% patient/21% provider comments); knowledge (18% patient/12% provider comments); cost/insurance coverage (10%/25%); attitudes (14%/7%); ordering of priorities (10%/11%); language (12%/7%); procedural issues regarding screenings (8%/10%); discrimination (2%/1%); and issues related to being a new immigrant (.2%/6%). Patient lack of understanding of the screening test procedures, inadequate knowledge about colorectal cancer, inadequate numbers of Spanish-speaking providers, and the cost of screening were most often cited as barriers by patients. Both providers and patients repeatedly mentioned the lack of funding and referral sources for colonoscopy as a key barrier to performing screening, even with lower-cost fecal occult blood tests, as colonoscopy follow-up would not be available. Patients favored receiving CRC screening recommendations from their usual continuity physician, but were open to receiving information on test procedures and indications from a Spanish-speaking health educator. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to improve funding and availability of colonoscopy for low-income persons could proceed in tandem with linguistically and culturally appropriate clinic-based efforts to improve CRC screening among Latinos.
Authors: Gloria D Coronado; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer J Sanchez; Amanda F Petrik; Beverly Green Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Jennifer D Allen; Bryan Leyva; A Idal Torres; Hosffman Ospino; Laura Tom; Sarah Rustan; Amanda Bartholomew Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2014-05
Authors: Jamie H Thompson; Melinda M Davis; Michael C Leo; Jennifer L Schneider; David H Smith; Amanda F Petrik; Melissa Castillo; Brittany Younger; Gloria D Coronado Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Gloria D Coronado; Amanda F Petrik; Mark Spofford; Jocelyn Talbot; Huyen Hoai Do; Victoria M Taylor Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2014-06-20
Authors: Resa M Jones; Steven H Woolf; Tina D Cunningham; Robert E Johnson; Alex H Krist; Stephen F Rothemich; Sally W Vernon Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2010-03-28 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Adrian H Zai; Seokjin Kim; Arnold Kamis; Ken Hung; Jeremiah G Ronquillo; Henry C Chueh; Steven J Atlas Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Alexander R Green; Angelleen Peters-Lewis; Sanja Percac-Lima; Joseph R Betancourt; James M Richter; Maria-Pamela R Janairo; Gloria B Gamba; Steven J Atlas Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-03-19 Impact factor: 5.128