Literature DB >> 15006109

Self-sampling in screening to reduce mortality from colorectal cancer: a qualitative exploration of the decision to complete a faecal occult blood test (FOBT).

I O'Sullivan1, S Orbell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore beliefs that might impact upon public reactions to a proposed population level faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening invitation and acceptability of completing an FOBT home self-sampling kit.
METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted to explore men and women's beliefs about colorectal cancer risk, their understanding of screening and reactions to an FOBT kit. Participants were shown a kit and permitted to examine it during the focus groups.
RESULTS: Colorectal cancer is viewed as having severe quality of life impacts and is commonly regarded as being caused by diet. Faecal blood is an expected symptom. A home self-sampling kit is viewed as highly acceptable, but some concerns were raised about collecting and storing faecal matter.
CONCLUSIONS: The main implications for public education arising from the analysis were firstly, that communications regarding the potential to avoid quality of life impacts of colorectal cancer may motivate participation; secondly, that public education might address the ability of the test to detect asymptomatic abnormalities, in particular occult (as opposed to visible) blood; thirdly, in order to prevent avoidance responses to fear, communications need to emphasise that many abnormal test outcomes will not be cancer and early treatment may prevent cancer and associated adverse quality of life impacts; fourthly, that uptake may be promoted by emphasising messages that the test kit is very convenient; and finally, that instruction leaflets might minimise procedural concerns by suggesting simple and easy methods to collect and store faecal samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15006109     DOI: 10.1177/096914130301100105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  15 in total

1.  Assessing non-response to a mailed health survey including self-collection of biological material.

Authors:  Anneli Uusküla; Mart Kals; Louise-Anne McNutt
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  Cancer fatalism and poor self-rated health mediate the association between socioeconomic status and uptake of colorectal cancer screening in England.

Authors:  Anne Miles; Sandra Rainbow; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Reasons for non-response to a direct-mailed FIT kit program: lessons learned from a pragmatic colorectal-cancer screening study in a federally sponsored health center.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer J Sanchez; Amanda F Petrik; Beverly Green
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Reactions to a targeted intervention to increase fecal occult blood testing among average-risk adults waiting for screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Elizabeth McGregor; Paul Ritvo; Jill Tinmouth; Ashley Kornblum; Ronald Myers; Robert J Hilsden; Lawrence F Paszat; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Attitudes and beliefs of non-participants in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nicola J Hall; Greg P Rubin; Christina Dobson; David Weller; Jane Wardle; Mary Ritchie; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Understanding low colorectal cancer screening uptake in South Asian faith communities in England--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Cecily K Palmer; Mary C Thomas; Lesley M McGregor; Christian von Wagner; Rosalind Raine
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Reasons for non-participation in the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Declan T Bradley; Charlene Treanor; Colin McMullan; Tracy Owen; Adele Graham; Diane Anderson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Factors associated with use and non-use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Response to a 2012 outreach screening program: a survey study.

Authors:  Nancy P Gordon; Beverly B Green
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study.

Authors:  C K Palmer; M C Thomas; C von Wagner; R Raine
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Responses to procedural information about colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: the role of consideration of future consequences.

Authors:  Christian von Wagner; Anna Good; Samuel G Smith; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.