OBJECTIVE: To assess radiation dose and image quality in body CT-angiography (CTA) with automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection (ATVS) on a 192-slice dual-source CT (DSCT). METHODS: Forty patients (69.5 ± 9.6 years) who had undergone body CTA with ATVS (ref.kVp 100, ref.mAs 90) using a 2x192-slice CT in single-source mode were retrospectively included. All patients had undergone prior CTA with a 2x128-slice CT and ATVS with identical imaging and contrast media protocols, serving for comparison. Images were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction at similar strength levels. Radiation dose was determined. Image quality was assessed semi-quantitatively (1:excellent, 5:non-diagnostic), aortic attenuation, noise and CNR were determined. RESULTS: As compared to 128-slice DSCT, 192-slice DSCT selected tube voltages were lower in 30 patients (75 %), higher in 3 (7.5 %), and similar in 7 patients (17.5 %). CTDIvol was lower with 192-slice DSCT (4.7 ± 1.9 mGy vs. 5.8 ± 2.1 mGy; p < 0.001). Subjective image quality, mean aortic attenuation (342 ± 67HU vs. 268 ± 67HU) and CNR (9.8 ± 2.5 vs. 8.2 ± 2.9) were higher with 192-slice DSCT (all p < 0.01), all datasets being diagnostic. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that ATVS of 192-slice DSCT for body CTA is associated with an improved image quality and further radiation dose reduction of 19 % compared to 128-slice DSCT. KEY POINTS: • 192-slice DSCT allows imaging from 70 kVp to 150 kVp at 10 kVp increments. • 192-slice DSCT allows for radiation-dose reduction in body-CTA with ATVS. • Subjective and objective image quality increase compared to 128-slice DSCT.
OBJECTIVE: To assess radiation dose and image quality in body CT-angiography (CTA) with automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection (ATVS) on a 192-slice dual-source CT (DSCT). METHODS: Forty patients (69.5 ± 9.6 years) who had undergone body CTA with ATVS (ref.kVp 100, ref.mAs 90) using a 2x192-slice CT in single-source mode were retrospectively included. All patients had undergone prior CTA with a 2x128-slice CT and ATVS with identical imaging and contrast media protocols, serving for comparison. Images were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction at similar strength levels. Radiation dose was determined. Image quality was assessed semi-quantitatively (1:excellent, 5:non-diagnostic), aortic attenuation, noise and CNR were determined. RESULTS: As compared to 128-slice DSCT, 192-slice DSCT selected tube voltages were lower in 30 patients (75 %), higher in 3 (7.5 %), and similar in 7 patients (17.5 %). CTDIvol was lower with 192-slice DSCT (4.7 ± 1.9 mGy vs. 5.8 ± 2.1 mGy; p < 0.001). Subjective image quality, mean aortic attenuation (342 ± 67HU vs. 268 ± 67HU) and CNR (9.8 ± 2.5 vs. 8.2 ± 2.9) were higher with 192-slice DSCT (all p < 0.01), all datasets being diagnostic. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that ATVS of 192-slice DSCT for body CTA is associated with an improved image quality and further radiation dose reduction of 19 % compared to 128-slice DSCT. KEY POINTS: • 192-slice DSCT allows imaging from 70 kVp to 150 kVp at 10 kVp increments. • 192-slice DSCT allows for radiation-dose reduction in body-CTA with ATVS. • Subjective and objective image quality increase compared to 128-slice DSCT.
Authors: Elliot L Chaikof; David C Brewster; Ronald L Dalman; Michel S Makaroun; Karl A Illig; Gregorio A Sicard; Carlos H Timaran; Gilbert R Upchurch; Frank J Veith Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Tobias Gassenmaier; Nils Petri; Thomas Allmendinger; Thomas Flohr; David Maintz; Wolfram Voelker; Thorsten A Bley Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-07-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Felix G Meinel; Christian Canstein; U Joseph Schoepf; Martin Sedlmaier; Bernhard Schmidt; Brett S Harris; Thomas G Flohr; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Aleksander W Krazinski; Felix G Meinel; U Joseph Schoepf; Justin R Silverman; Christian Canstein; Carlo N De Cecco; Lucas L Geyer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-07-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Marilyn Joy Siegel; Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo; Charles Hildebolt; David Bradley; Bernhard Schmidt Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Sebastian T Schindera; Patricia Graca; Michael A Patak; Susanne Abderhalden; Gabriel von Allmen; Peter Vock; Zsolt Szucs-Farkas Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Stefanie Mangold; Julian L Wichmann; U Joseph Schoepf; Zachary B Poole; Christian Canstein; Akos Varga-Szemes; Damiano Caruso; Fabian Bamberg; Konstantin Nikolaou; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Julian L Wichmann; Andrew D Hardie; U Joseph Schoepf; Lloyd M Felmly; Jonathan D Perry; Akos Varga-Szemes; Stefanie Mangold; Damiano Caruso; Christian Canstein; Thomas J Vogl; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: S Suntharalingam; A Wetter; N Guberina; J Theysohn; A Ringelstein; T Schlosser; M Forsting; K Nassenstein Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Doris Leithner; Julian L Wichmann; Scherwin Mahmoudi; Simon S Martin; Moritz H Albrecht; Thomas J Vogl; Jan-Erik Scholtz Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Stefanie Mangold; Julian L Wichmann; U Joseph Schoepf; Damiano Caruso; Christian Tesche; Daniel H Steinberg; Akos Varga-Szemes; Andrew C Stubenrauch; Richard R Bayer; Matthew Biancalana; Konstantin Nikolaou; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jan-Erik Scholtz; Julian L Wichmann; Kristina Hüsers; Moritz H Albrecht; Martin Beeres; Ralf W Bauer; Thomas J Vogl; Boris Bodelle Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Lukas Lenga; Franziska Trapp; Moritz H Albrecht; Julian L Wichmann; Addison A Johnson; Ibrahim Yel; Tommaso D'Angelo; Christian Booz; Thomas J Vogl; Simon S Martin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Lukas Lenga; Marvin Lange; Simon S Martin; Moritz H Albrecht; Christian Booz; Ibrahim Yel; Christophe T Arendt; Thomas J Vogl; Doris Leithner Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Saravanabavaan Suntharalingam; Franz Ferdinand Stecker; Nika Guberina; Adrian Ringelstein; Thomas Schlosser; Jens Matthias Theysohn; Michael Forsting; Kai Nassenstein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael M Lell; Ulrike Fleischmann; Hubertus Pietsch; Johannes G Korporaal; Ulrike Haberland; Andreas H Mahnken; Thomas G Flohr; Michael Uder; Gregor Jost Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 3.240