Literature DB >> 25692441

The role and validity of surgical simulation.

Riaz A Agha1, Alexander J Fowler.   

Abstract

In the last three decades, simulation has become a key tool in the training of doctors and the maintenance of patient safety. Simulation offers an immersive, realistic way of learning technical skills. Recent changes to the training schemes in many surgical specialities mean that the hours spent working between senior house officer and consultant have been reduced. This, combined with other pressures (such as reduced operating hours), means that surgery has moved away from its traditional apprenticeship model and toward a competency-based one. Simulation can be a standardized and safe method for training and assessing surgeons. Use of simulation for training has become significant alongside the development of laparoscopic techniques, and evidence suggests that skills obtained in simulation are applicable in real clinical scenarios. Simulation allows trainees to make mistakes, to ask the "what if?" questions, and to learn and reflect on such situations without risking patient safety. Virtual reality simulators have been used to allow experts to plan complicated operations and assess perioperative risks. Most recently, fully immersive simulations, such as those with whole theater teams involved, and patient-centered simulations allow development of other key skills aside from purely technical ones. Use of simulation in isolation from traditional teaching methods will furnish the surgeon in training with skills, but the best time and place to use such skills comes only with experience. In this article we examine the role of simulation in surgical training and its impact in the context of reduced training time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic surgery; Simulation; Surgical education; Surgical training

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25692441      PMCID: PMC4337453          DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00004.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Surg        ISSN: 0020-8868


  59 in total

Review 1.  Virtual reality simulators: current status in acquisition and assessment of surgical skills.

Authors:  Peter H Cosman; Patrick C Cregan; Christopher J Martin; John A Cartmill
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 2.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; K Moorthy; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery: results and analysis.

Authors:  Gregory Tholey; Jaydev P Desai; Andres E Castellanos
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Trends in North American medical education.

Authors:  Karyn D Baum; Sara Axtell
Journal:  Keio J Med       Date:  2005-03

5.  Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents.

Authors:  P Ström; L Hedman; L Särnå; A Kjellin; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Surgical education for the twenty-first century: beyond the apprentice model.

Authors:  Andrew J Walter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor P Grantcharov; Jens R Eriksen; Dorthe Blirup; Viggo B Kristiansen; Peter Funch-Jensen; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery recommendations for training in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1994

9.  Visuospatial skills and computer game experience influence the performance of virtual endoscopy.

Authors:  Lars Enochsson; Bengt Isaksson; René Tour; Ann Kjellin; Leif Hedman; Torsten Wredmark; Li Tsai-Felländer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Evaluation of a framework for case development and simulated patient training for complex procedures.

Authors:  Stephen A Black; Debra F Nestel; Emma J Horrocks; Rachael H Harrison; Norma Jones; Cordula M Wetzel; John H N Wolfe; Roger L Kneebone; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.929

View more
  32 in total

1.  Current status of urology surgical training in Europe: an ESRU-ESU-ESUT collaborative study.

Authors:  Diego M Carrion; Moises E Rodriguez-Socarrás; Guglielmo Mantica; Francesco Esperto; Angelika Cebulla; Diederick Duijvesz; Giulio Patruno; Juan L Vásquez; Domenico Veneziano; Jesús Díez-Sebastian; Ali S Gozen; Joan Palou; Juan Gómez Rivas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Crisis Management Simulation: Review of Current Experience.

Authors:  Coulter Small; Divine Nwafor; Devan Patel; Fakhry Dawoud; Abeer Dagra; Jeremy Ciporen; Brandon Lucke-Wold
Journal:  SunText Rev Neurosci Psychol       Date:  2021-03-27

3.  Virtual Surgical Training During COVID-19: Operating Room Simulation Platforms Accessible from Home.

Authors:  Tyler McKechnie; Marc Levin; Kelvin Zhou; Benjamin Freedman; Vanessa Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Development of a Smartphone-Based Skin Simulation Model for Medical Education.

Authors:  Roshan Dsouza; Darold R Spillman; Scott Barrows; Thomas Golemon; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.929

5.  Conception and design of novel lumbar drain insertion simulator.

Authors:  Nikhil Krishna Murthy; Ellie O'Brien; Nader S Dahdaleh
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2021-06-28

6.  Value of an Action Cam in Surgical Pathology.

Authors:  Konstantin Bräutigam; Lucine Christe; Yara Banz
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-11-29

7.  The Feasibility of Virtual Reality and Student-Led Simulation Training as Methods of Lumbar Puncture Instruction.

Authors:  Mark Roehr; Teresa Wu; Philip Maykowski; Bryce Munter; Shelby Hoebee; Eshaan Daas; Paul Kang
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-11-20

8.  Comparative analysis of the results of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy simulation using the three-dimensional-printed Biotexture wet-lung model and surgeons' experience.

Authors:  Takahiko Tanaka; Yoshihisa Shimada; Hideyuki Furumoto; Yojiro Makino; Yujin Kudo; Sachio Maehara; Masaru Hagiwara; Masatoshi Kakihana; Naohiro Kajiwara; Tatsuo Ohira; Norihiko Ikeda
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-01-22

9.  The perceived global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on doctors' medical and surgical training: An international survey.

Authors:  Ryan Laloo; Rama Santhosh Karri; Kasun Wanigasooriya; William Beedham; Adnan Darr; Georgia R Layton; Peter Logan; Yanyu Tan; Devender Mittapalli; Tapan Patel; Vivaswan Dutt Mishra; Osama Faleh Odeh; Swathi Prakash; Salma Elnoamany; Sri Ramya Peddinti; Elorm Adzoa Daketsey; Shardool Gadgil; Ahmad Bouhuwaish; Ahmad Ozair; Sanchit Bansal; Muhammed Elhadi; Aditya Amit Godbole; Ariana Axiaq; Faateh Ahmad Rauf; Ashna Ashpak
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.149

10.  The effect of preferred music on mental workload and laparoscopic surgical performance in a simulated setting (OPTIMISE): a randomized controlled crossover study.

Authors:  Victor X Fu; Pim Oomens; Vincent E E Kleinrensink; Karel J Sleurink; Willemijn M Borst; Pascale E Wessels; Johan F Lange; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.