Literature DB >> 11906421

Virtual reality simulators: current status in acquisition and assessment of surgical skills.

Peter H Cosman1, Patrick C Cregan, Christopher J Martin, John A Cartmill.   

Abstract

Medical technology is currently evolving so rapidly that its impact cannot be analysed. Robotics and telesurgery loom on the horizon, and the technology used to drive these advances has serendipitous side-effects for the education and training arena. The graphical and haptic interfaces used to provide remote feedback to the operator--by passing control to a computer--may be used to generate simulations of the operative environment that are useful for training candidates in surgical procedures. One additional advantage is that the metrics calculated inherently in the controlling software in order to run the simulation may be used to provide performance feedback to individual trainees and mentors. New interfaces will be required to undergo evaluation of the simulation fidelity before being deemed acceptable. The potential benefits fall into one of two general categories: those benefits related to skill acquisition, and those related to skill assessment. The educational value of the simulation will require assessment, and comparison to currently available methods of training in any given procedure. It is also necessary to determine--by repeated trials--whether a given simulation actually measures the performance parameters it purports to measure. This trains the spotlight on what constitutes good surgical skill, and how it is to be objectively measured. Early results suggest that virtual reality simulators have an important role to play in this aspect of surgical training.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11906421     DOI: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02293.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  10 in total

1.  Minimal-access surgery training in the Netherlands: a survey among residents-in-training for general surgery.

Authors:  M P Schijven; J T M Berlage; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Telesurgery: windows of opportunity.

Authors:  Sulbha Arora; Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2007-01

3.  The role and validity of surgical simulation.

Authors:  Riaz A Agha; Alexander J Fowler
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-02

4.  An advanced simulator for orthopedic surgical training.

Authors:  J Cecil; Avinash Gupta; Miguel Pirela-Cruz
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Remote surgical education using synthetic models combined with an augmented reality headset.

Authors:  Nelson N Stone; Michael P Wilson; Steven H Griffith; Jos Immerzeel; Frans Debruyne; Michael A Gorin; Wayne Brisbane; Peter F Orio; Laura S Kim; Jonathan J Stone
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-23

6.  Extent of innate dexterity and ambidexterity across handedness and gender: Implications for training in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  F H F Elneel; F Carter; B Tang; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The learning curve on the Xitact LS 500 laparoscopy simulator: profiles of performance.

Authors:  M P Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Are multiple views superior to a single view when teaching hip surgery? A single-blinded randomized controlled trial of technical skill acquisition.

Authors:  Huixiang Wang; Kapil Sugand; Simon Newman; Gareth Jones; Justin Cobb; Edouard Auvinet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.

Authors:  O A J van der Meijden; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Basic skin surgery interactive simulation: system description and randomised educational trial.

Authors:  Hasan Naveed; Richard Hudson; Manaf Khatib; Fernando Bello
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.