Literature DB >> 33212508

Comparative analysis of the results of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy simulation using the three-dimensional-printed Biotexture wet-lung model and surgeons' experience.

Takahiko Tanaka1, Yoshihisa Shimada, Hideyuki Furumoto1, Yojiro Makino1, Yujin Kudo1, Sachio Maehara1, Masaru Hagiwara1, Masatoshi Kakihana1, Naohiro Kajiwara1, Tatsuo Ohira1, Norihiko Ikeda1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We performed a comparative analysis of the performance of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy simulation using three-dimensional-printed Biotexture lung models by surgeons classified according to their level of expertise. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between surgeons' experience and time to complete the VATS lobectomy simulation.
METHODS: Participants were divided into 3 groups: group A included those who had no experience of actual VATS lobectomy (n = 11), group B included those who had performed 5-10 VATS lobectomies (n = 12) and group C included those who had performed >100 VATS lobectomies (n = 6). Their performances were assessed based on total procedure time, duration to the exposure of the vessels, ligation of the arteries and stapling of the fissures. After the simulation, a questionnaire survey was performed.
RESULTS: The median total procedure time was significantly shorter in the group of surgeons with more experience (A vs B, P < 0.001; B vs C, P = 0.034; A vs C, P < 0.001). Regarding 'the exposure of all the vessels to be resected' and 'ligation of the arteries', group B completed these steps in less time than group A (P = 0.024 and P = 0.012, respectively). In the questionnaire, all groups answered that this simulation was useful for novices to improve their skills.
CONCLUSIONS: Although time to complete the VATS lobectomy simulation is only a part of evaluation points for real skills, this model can facilitate basic skill acquisitions for novices.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Simulation; Simulation training; Thoracoscopy; Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33212508      PMCID: PMC8906763          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  30 in total

1.  The impact of the 80-hour resident workweek on surgical residents and attending surgeons.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutter; Katherine C Kellogg; Charles M Ferguson; William M Abbott; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Learning thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  René Horsleben Petersen; Henrik Jessen Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Morten Bendixen; Ole Dan Jørgensen; Christian Kronborg; Claus Andersen; Peter Bjørn Licht
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  A new possibility in thoracoscopic virtual reality simulation training: development and testing of a novel virtual reality simulator for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy.

Authors:  Katrine Jensen; Flemming Bjerrum; Henrik Jessen Hansen; René Horsleben Petersen; Jesper Holst Pedersen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-07-10

Review 5.  Innovations in surgery simulation: a review of past, current and future techniques.

Authors:  Ido Badash; Karen Burtt; Carlos A Solorzano; Joseph N Carey
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

6.  Learning curve for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; René H Petersen; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Teaching video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy-using an ex vivo simulation model.

Authors:  Marcelo Jimenez; Maria Teresa Gomez-Hernandez
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-03-17

8.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open thoracotomy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity score analysis based on a multi-institutional registry.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Zhi-Hua Zhu; Tristan D Yan; Qun Wang; Gening Jiang; Lunxu Liu; Deruo Liu; Zheng Wang; Wenlong Shao; Deborah Black; Qian Zhao; Jianxing He
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  VATS lobectomy has better perioperative outcomes than open lobectomy: CALGB 31001, an ancillary analysis of CALGB 140202 (Alliance).

Authors:  Chukwumere E Nwogu; Jonathan D'Cunha; Herbert Pang; Lin Gu; Xiaofei Wang; William G Richards; Linda J Veit; Todd L Demmy; David J Sugarbaker; Leslie J Kohman; Scott J Swanson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Surgical treatment for empyema thoracis: is video-assisted thoracic surgery "better" than thoracotomy?

Authors:  Daniel T L Chan; Alan D L Sihoe; Shun Chan; Dickson S F Tsang; Ben Fang; Tak-Wai Lee; Lik-Cheung Cheng
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  1 in total

1.  The use of objective assessments in the evaluation of technical skills in cardiothoracic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nabil Hussein; Jef Van den Eynde; Connor Callahan; Alvise Guariento; Can Gollmann-Tepeköylü; Malak Elbatarny; Mahmoud Loubani
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.