Literature DB >> 15621997

Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery: results and analysis.

Gregory Tholey1, Jaydev P Desai, Andres E Castellanos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of force feedback with applications to minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Two research hypotheses were tested using our automated laparoscopic grasper. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Conventional laparoscopic tools do not have the ability of providing force feedback to a surgeon when in use with or without robotic surgical systems. Loss of haptic (force and tactile) feedback in MIS procedures is a disadvantage to surgeons since they are conventionally used to palpating tissues to diagnose tissues as normal or abnormal. Therefore, the need exists to incorporate force feedback into laparoscopic tools.
METHODS: We have developed an automated laparoscopic grasper with force feedback capability to help surgeons differentiate tissue stiffness through a haptic interface device. We tested our system with 20 human subjects (10 surgeons and 10 nonsurgeons) using our grasper to evaluate the role of force feedback to characterize tissues and answer 2 research hypotheses.
RESULTS: Our experiments confirmed 1 of our 2 research hypotheses, namely, providing both vision and force feedback leads to better tissue characterization than only vision feedback or only force feedback.
CONCLUSIONS: We have validated 1 of our 2 research hypotheses regarding incorporating force feedback with vision feedback to characterize tissues of varying stiffness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15621997      PMCID: PMC1356852          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000149301.60553.1e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  5 in total

1.  Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery--experimental performance evaluation.

Authors:  J Rosen; B Hannaford; M P MacFarlane; M N Sinanan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Development and in vitro testing of a miniature robotic system for computer-assisted colonoscopy.

Authors:  P Dario; M C Carrozza; A Pietrabissa
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  1999

3.  Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery. A review of the ARTEMIS project. Advanced Robotic Telemanipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  M O Schurr; G Buess; B Neisius; U Voges
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  An advanced robot system for automated diagnostic tasks through palpation.

Authors:  P Dario; M Bergamasco
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Synchronous and "early" metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma: analysis of prognosis and current trends.

Authors:  H S Chen; S M Sheen-Chen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.585

  5 in total
  39 in total

1.  An experimental study about haptic feedback in robotic surgery: may visual feedback substitute tactile feedback?

Authors:  Giuseppe Meccariello; Federico Faedi; Saleh AlGhamdi; Filippo Montevecchi; Elisabetta Firinu; Claudia Zanotti; Davide Cavaliere; Roberta Gunelli; Marco Taurchini; Andrea Amadori; Claudio Vicini
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-11-11

Review 2.  Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education.

Authors:  Bishoy Morris
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-09-27

3.  Haptic discrimination of two-dimensional angles: influence of exploratory strategy.

Authors:  Myriam Levy; Stéphanie Bourgeon; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Learning kinematic mappings in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; Carla M Pugh; James L Patton; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

5.  Development of force measurement system for clinical use in minimal access surgery.

Authors:  George B Hanna; Tim Drew; Graham Arnold; Morkos Fakhry; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Can surgeons think and operate with haptics at the same time?

Authors:  Caroline G L Cao; Mi Zhou; Daniel B Jones; Steven D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance.

Authors:  Carol E Reiley; Takintope Akinbiyi; Darius Burschka; David C Chang; Allison M Okamura; David D Yuh
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery.

Authors:  M E Hagen; J J Meehan; I Inan; P Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Optimal training design for procedural motor skills: a review and application to laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Edward N Spruit; Guido P H Band; Jaap F Hamming; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-11-08

10.  Construct validity and educational role for motion analysis in a laparoscopic trainer.

Authors:  Maeve O'Neill Trudeau; Ahmed Nasr; Brian Carrillo; J Ted Gerstle; Georges Azzie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.