Literature DB >> 34457871

The Feasibility of Virtual Reality and Student-Led Simulation Training as Methods of Lumbar Puncture Instruction.

Mark Roehr1, Teresa Wu1,2, Philip Maykowski1, Bryce Munter1, Shelby Hoebee1, Eshaan Daas1, Paul Kang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited data assessing simulation and virtual reality training as a standardized tool in medical education. This feasibility study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality training and a student-led simulation module in preparing medical students to perform a lumbar puncture.
METHODS: Twenty-five medical students completed a pre-intervention survey, and a baseline video recorded lumbar puncture procedure on a task trainer. Students were randomly distributed into the virtual reality group, or the curriculum's standard student-led procedural instruction group. Participants were then given 45 min to practice the lumbar puncture procedure. After the intervention, all participants were video recorded again as they performed a post-intervention lumbar puncture and completed a post-intervention survey. Pre- and post-intervention videos were scored using a critical action checklist in conjunction with time needed to complete the procedure to evaluate proficiency.
RESULTS: At baseline, there were no major statistically significant differences between groups. Assessing overall post-intervention performance, both groups showed improvement in aggregate score (p < 0.001) and time required to complete (p = 0.002) the lumbar puncture. Following interventions, the student-led group improved over the virtual reality group in a variety of metrics. The student-led group increased their aggregate score by 3.49 and decreased their time to completion by 34 s over the VR group when controlling for baseline measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Both virtual reality and student-led simulation training were useful training modalities, with hands-on simulation showing better results versus virtual reality training in this setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-020-01141-6. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical skills; Medical education; Procedural training; Simulation; Student-led; Virtual reality

Year:  2020        PMID: 34457871      PMCID: PMC8368585          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-01141-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  29 in total

1.  Peer-led resuscitation training for healthcare students: a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Gavin D Perkins; J Hulme; Julian F Bion
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Tomorrow's educators … today? Implementing near-peer teaching for medical students.

Authors:  Adam J Nelson; Sophie V Nelson; Andrew M J Linn; Lynne E Raw; Hugh B Kildea; Anne L Tonkin
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 3.  Simulation techniques in the anatomy curriculum: review of literature.

Authors:  K Torres; A Torres; L Pietrzyk; J Lisiecka; M Błoński; M Bącik-Donica; G Staśkiewicz; R Maciejewski
Journal:  Folia Morphol (Warsz)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.183

4.  Virtual Simulation in Enhancing Procedural Training for Fluoroscopy-guided Lumbar Puncture: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Saad Ali; Monther Qandeel; Rishi Ramakrishna; Carina W Yang
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 5.  Review article: simulation: a means to address and improve patient safety.

Authors:  Viren N Naik; Susan E Brien
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy.

Authors:  Christian Moro; Zane Štromberga; Athanasios Raikos; Allan Stirling
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing.

Authors:  Fatimah Lateef
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-10

8.  Design of simulation-based medical education and advantages and disadvantages of in situ simulation versus off-site simulation.

Authors:  Jette Led Sørensen; Doris Østergaard; Vicki LeBlanc; Bent Ottesen; Lars Konge; Peter Dieckmann; Cees Van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 9.  Emerging Applications of Virtual Reality in Cardiovascular Medicine.

Authors:  Jennifer N A Silva; Michael Southworth; Constantine Raptis; Jonathan Silva
Journal:  JACC Basic Transl Sci       Date:  2018-06-25

Review 10.  Simulation-based assessments in health professional education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tayne Ryall; Belinda K Judd; Christopher J Gordon
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2016-02-22
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Virtual Simulation in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review of Recent Practice.

Authors:  Qingming Wu; Yubin Wang; Lili Lu; Yong Chen; Hui Long; Jun Wang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.