Literature DB >> 25680728

Metal artefact suppression at 3 T MRI: comparison of MAVRIC-SL with conventional fast spin echo sequences in patients with Hip joint arthroplasty.

Martin Kretzschmar1, Lorenzo Nardo, Misung M Han, Ursula Heilmeier, Craig Sam, Gabby B Joseph, Kevin M Koch, Roland Krug, Thomas M Link.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility and diagnostic value of a new MRI metal artefact reduction pulse sequence called MAVRIC-SL in a 3 T MRI environment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two MAVRIC-SL sequences obtained in 61 patients with symptomatic total hip replacement were compared with standard FSE-STIR sequences optimized for imaging around metal. Artefact size was measured on the slice of greatest extent. Image quality, fat saturation, image distortion, visibility of anatomical structures, and detectability of joint abnormalities were visually assessed and graded on qualitative scales. Differences between MAVRIC-SL and FSE sequences were tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
RESULTS: MAVRIC-SL sequences at 3 T showed significantly smaller metal artefacts compared to FSE-STIR sequences (p < 0.0001). The general image quality of MAVRIC-SL sequences was reduced with regard to spatial resolution, noise and contrast (p = 0.001), and fat saturation (p < 0.0001). The reduction of artefact size and image distortion significantly improved visualization of joint anatomy (p < 0.0001) and diagnostic confidence regarding implant-associated abnormalities (p = 0.0075 to <0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Although the image quality of MAVRIC-SL sequences is limited at 3 T, its clinical application is feasible and provides important additional diagnostic information for the workup of patients with symptomatic hip replacement through substantially reduced metal artefacts. KEY POINTS: • Metal artefacts compromise imaging of total hip replacement with MRI. • Metal artefacts are aggravated with 3 Tesla MRI. • MAVRIC-SL is a technique to suppress metal artefacts. • MAVRIC-SL effectively reduces metal artefacts at 3 Tesla and improves diagnostic quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25680728     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3628-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  17 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging near metal implants.

Authors:  K M Koch; B A Hargreaves; K Butts Pauly; W Chen; G E Gold; K F King
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  A multispectral three-dimensional acquisition technique for imaging near metal implants.

Authors:  Kevin M Koch; John E Lorbiecki; R Scott Hinks; Kevin F King
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Slice encoding for metal artifact correction with noise reduction.

Authors:  Wenmiao Lu; Kim B Pauly; Garry E Gold; John M Pauly; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopedic hardware: comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI.

Authors:  Cormac Farrelly; Amir Davarpanah; Stephen A Brennan; Stephen Brennan; Mathew Sampson; Stephen J Eustace
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Ripple artifact reduction using slice overlap in slice encoding for metal artifact correction.

Authors:  J Chiel den Harder; Gert H van Yperen; Ulrike A Blume; Clemens Bos
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Current modes of failure in TKA: infection, instability, and stiffness predominate.

Authors:  David H Le; Stuart B Goodman; William J Maloney; James I Huddleston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  MRI predicts ALVAL and tissue damage in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danyal H Nawabi; Stephanie Gold; Steven Lyman; Kara Fields; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  SEMAC: Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction in MRI.

Authors:  Wenmiao Lu; Kim Butts Pauly; Garry E Gold; John M Pauly; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Pelvic osteolysis relationship to radiographs and polyethylene wear.

Authors:  Won Yong Shon; Siddhartha Gupta; Sandeep Biswal; Sang Hwan Han; Suk Joo Hong; Jun Gyu Moon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  A population-based survival analysis describing the association of body mass index on time to revision for total hip and knee replacements: results from the UK general practice research database.

Authors:  David Culliford; Joe Maskell; Andy Judge; Nigel K Arden
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Imaging near orthopedic hardware.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Alissa J Burge; Kevin M Koch; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Comparison of radiographs, tomosynthesis and CT with metal artifact reduction for the detection of hip prosthetic loosening.

Authors:  Romain Gillet; Pedro Teixeira; Chloé Bonarelli; Henry Coudane; François Sirveaux; Mathias Louis; Alain Blum
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Metal artifact suppression at the hip: diagnostic performance at 3.0 T versus 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nardo; Misung Han; Martin Kretzschmar; Martin Kretschmar; Michele Guindani; Kevin Koch; Thomas Vail; Roland Krug; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The Utility of MRI With Multiacquisition Variable-Resonance Image Combination (MAVRIC) in Diagnosing Deep Total Hip Arthroplasty Infection.

Authors:  Ashley E Levack; Chelsea Koch; Harold G Moore; Michael B Cross
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-05-10

5.  Metal artifact reduction MRI of total ankle arthroplasty implants.

Authors:  Cesar de Cesar Netto; Lucas F Fonseca; Benjamin Fritz; Steven E Stern; Esther Raithel; Mathias Nittka; Lew C Schon; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Metallic implant geometry and susceptibility estimation using multispectral B0 field maps.

Authors:  Xinwei Shi; Daehyun Yoon; Kevin M Koch; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners.

Authors:  Mikael Sonesson; Fahad Al-Qabandi; Sven Månsson; Salem Abdulraheem; Lars Bondemark; Kristina Hellén-Halme
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-01-29

8.  Clinical utility of accelerated MAVRIC-SL with robust-PCA compared to conventional MAVRIC-SL in evaluation of total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Zoe Doyle; Daehyun Yoon; Philip K Lee; Jarrett Rosenberg; Brian A Hargreaves; Christopher F Beaulieu; Kathryn J Stevens
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Novel MR imaging method--MAVRIC--for metal artifact suppression after joint replacement in musculoskeletal tumor patients.

Authors:  Michiro Susa; Sota Oguro; Kazutaka Kikuta; Kazumasa Nishimoto; Keisuke Horiuchi; Masahiro Jinzaki; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Kazuhiro Chiba; Hideo Morioka
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Using SEMAC at 3 T MR to evaluate spinal metallic implants and peripheral soft tissue lesions.

Authors:  Chun Xin; Houdong Liu; Shihong Li; Guangwu Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.