Literature DB >> 24615421

Current modes of failure in TKA: infection, instability, and stiffness predominate.

David H Le1, Stuart B Goodman, William J Maloney, James I Huddleston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Historically, polyethylene wear and its sequelae (osteolysis, late instability, aseptic loosening) were common causes for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Recently, polyethylene manufacturing has become more consistent; furthermore, a clearer understanding of the importance of oxidation on polyethylene performance led to packaging of the polyethylene bearings in an inert environment. This improved the quality and consistency of polyethylene used in TKA, raising the question of whether different failure modes now predominate after TKA. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to determine the current reasons for (1) early and (2) late failures after TKA at one high-volume arthroplasty center.
METHODS: We reviewed all first-time revision TKAs performed between 2001 and 2011 at one institution, yielding a group of 253 revision TKAs in 251 patients. Mean age at the time of revision was 64 years (SD 10 years). Mean time to revision was 35 months (SD 23 months). Preoperative evaluations, laboratory data, radiographs, and intraoperative findings were used to determine causes for revision. Early failure was defined as revision within 2 years of the index procedure. The primary failure mechanism was determined by the operating surgeon.
RESULTS: Early failure accounted for 46% (116 of 253) of all revisions with infection (28 of 116 [24%]), instability (30 of 116 [26%]), and stiffness (21 of 116 [18%]) being the leading causes. Late failure accounted for 54% (137 of 253) of all revisions with the most common causes including infection (34 of 137 [25%]), instability (24 of 137 [18%]), and stiffness (19 of 253 [14%]). Polyethylene wear was implicated as the failure mechanism in 2% of early cases (two of 116) and 9% of late cases (13 of 137).
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies, wear-related implant failure in TKA was relatively uncommon in this series. Changes in polyethylene manufacturing, sterilization, and storage may have accounted for some of this difference; however, longer-term followup will be required to verify this finding. Infection, instability, and stiffness represent the most common causes of early and late failure. Strategies to improve outcomes in TKA should be aimed at infection prophylaxis and treatment, surgical technique, and patient selection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24615421      PMCID: PMC4048402          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3540-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  16 in total

1.  Early failures in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  T K Fehring; S Odum; W L Griffin; J B Mason; M Nadaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Why knees fail.

Authors:  Kelly G Vince
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  Why knees fail: lessons learned.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; Michael R O'rourke; Khaled J Saleh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene insert. Findings at five to ten years postoperatively.

Authors:  Matthew B Collier; C Anderson Engh; James P Mcauley; Stuart D Ginn; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Jordana Schmier; Fionna Mowat; Khaled Saleh; Eva Dybvik; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick; Leif I Havelin; Ove Furnes; Henrik Malchau; Edmund Lau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Michael B Vessely; Andrew L Whaley; W Scott Harmsen; Cathy D Schleck; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?

Authors:  Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack; Richard H Rothman; Shani Shastri; Sidney M Jacoby
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Why are total knee replacements revised?: analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry.

Authors:  Terence J Gioe; Kathleen K Killeen; Katherine Grimm; Susan Mehle; Karen Scheltema
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  What are the causes of revision total knee arthroplasty in Japan?

Authors:  Yasuhiko Kasahara; Tokifumi Majima; Shoichi Kimura; Osamu Nishiike; Jun Uchida
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  56 in total

Review 1.  Cochrane in CORR (®): Continuous Passive Motion Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in People With Arthritis (Review).

Authors:  Harman Chaudhry; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Recovery of knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty in the first postoperative weeks: poor recovery can be detected early.

Authors:  A Kornuijt; G J L de Kort; D Das; A F Lenssen; W van der Weegen
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-01-09

Review 3.  Metal hypersensitivity in total hip and knee arthroplasty: Current concepts.

Authors:  Samuel Akil; Jared M Newman; Neil V Shah; Natasha Ahmed; Ajit J Deshmukh; Aditya V Maheshwari
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-10-10

4.  Stability and alignment do not improve by using patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nienke M Kosse; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Janneke J P Schimmel; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Ate B Wymenga; Koen C Defoort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  CORR Insights®: Does Accelerometer-based Navigation Have Any Clinical Benefit Compared with Conventional TKA? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jean-Noel A Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Over-voluming predicted by pre-operative planning in 24% of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Simon Marmor; Eric Renault; Jeremy Valluy; Mo Saffarini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Anatomical evaluation of the femoral attachment of the posterior oblique ligament.

Authors:  Shinichi Kuriyama; Yosuke Hamamoto; Ryuzo Arai; Shinichiro Nakamura; Kohei Nishitani; Hiromu Ito; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Increased Risk of Revision, Reoperation, and Implant Constraint in TKA After Multiligament Knee Surgery.

Authors:  Steven I Pancio; Paul L Sousa; Aaron J Krych; Matthew P Abdel; Bruce A Levy; Diane L Dahm; Michael J Stuart
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Manipulation under anesthesia following total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive review of literature.

Authors:  A Kornuijt; D Das; T Sijbesma; L de Vries; W van der Weegen
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-03-15

10.  Treatment of Periprosthetic Knee Infection With a Two-stage Protocol Using Static Spacers.

Authors:  Paul Lichstein; Sharlene Su; Hakan Hedlund; Gina Suh; William J Maloney; Stuart B Goodman; James I Huddleston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.