BACKGROUND/AIMS: The influence of TAS2R38 haplotype on the relationship between the perceived intensity of propylthiouracil (PROP) and the basic tastes of salt, sweet, sour, and bitter (quinine) was evaluated in the Beaver Dam Offspring Study. METHODS: Genotyping was performed on 1,670 participants aged ≥45 years (mean age = 54.4; range = 45-84), and suprathreshold taste intensity was measured using filter paper disks and a general labeled magnitude scale (0-100). RESULTS: Among those with taste intensity data and the PAV or AVI haplotype (n = 1,258), the mean perceived intensity of PROP was 37.3 (SD = 30.0), but it varied significantly (p < 0.0001) by diplotype (PAV/PAV = 60.1; PAV/AVI = 46.5; AVI/AVI = 14.4). PROP intensity was correlated with the basic taste intensities (salt: r = 0.22; sweet: r = 0.25; sour: r = 0.21; quinine bitterness: r = 0.38; p < 0.001 for all tastes); however, a significant effect modification of the PROP-taste intensity relationships by TAS2R38 diplotype was observed. There was a stronger association between PROP and each of the basic tastes in the PAV/PAV diplotype group than in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Directly measuring the perceived intensity of the 4 tastes, rather than using PROP intensity as an indicator of taste responsiveness, is recommended for studies of taste perception.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The influence of TAS2R38 haplotype on the relationship between the perceived intensity of propylthiouracil (PROP) and the basic tastes of salt, sweet, sour, and bitter (quinine) was evaluated in the Beaver Dam Offspring Study. METHODS: Genotyping was performed on 1,670 participants aged ≥45 years (mean age = 54.4; range = 45-84), and suprathreshold taste intensity was measured using filter paper disks and a general labeled magnitude scale (0-100). RESULTS: Among those with taste intensity data and the PAV or AVI haplotype (n = 1,258), the mean perceived intensity of PROP was 37.3 (SD = 30.0), but it varied significantly (p < 0.0001) by diplotype (PAV/PAV = 60.1; PAV/AVI = 46.5; AVI/AVI = 14.4). PROP intensity was correlated with the basic taste intensities (salt: r = 0.22; sweet: r = 0.25; sour: r = 0.21; quinine bitterness: r = 0.38; p < 0.001 for all tastes); however, a significant effect modification of the PROP-taste intensity relationships by TAS2R38 diplotype was observed. There was a stronger association between PROP and each of the basic tastes in the PAV/PAV diplotype group than in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Directly measuring the perceived intensity of the 4 tastes, rather than using PROP intensity as an indicator of taste responsiveness, is recommended for studies of taste perception.
Authors: Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2006-07-23 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Mary E Fischer; Karen J Cruickshanks; Carla R Schubert; Alex Pinto; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; F Javier Nieto; James S Pankow; Guan-Hua Huang; Derek J Snyder Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2013-04-26 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Valerie B Duffy; John E Hayes; Andrew C Davidson; Judith R Kidd; Kenneth K Kidd; Linda M Bartoshuk Journal: Chemosens Percept Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 1.833
Authors: Liang-Dar Hwang; Paul A S Breslin; Danielle R Reed; Gu Zhu; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright Journal: Chem Senses Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 3.160
Authors: Jennifer L Smith; Steven Estus; Terry A Lennie; Debra K Moser; Misook L Chung; Gia Mudd-Martin Journal: Biol Res Nurs Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 2.522
Authors: Sally Eldeghaidy; Daniel Thomas; Martha Skinner; Rebecca Ford; Timo Giesbrecht; Anna Thomas; Joanne Hort; Susan Francis Journal: Physiol Behav Date: 2017-12-06
Authors: Ajoy C Karikkineth; Eric Y Tang; Pei-Lun Kuo; Luigi Ferrucci; Josephine M Egan; Chee W Chia Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 5.682