| Literature DB >> 34857670 |
Ajoy C Karikkineth1, Eric Y Tang2, Pei-Lun Kuo3, Luigi Ferrucci3, Josephine M Egan2, Chee W Chia2.
Abstract
Tongue fungiform papillae contain taste buds crucial for taste and hormone-producing taste receptor cells; therefore, they may be considered as endocrine organs and have important age-associated physiological implications. We examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal trajectories of fungiform papillae density in 1084 participants from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging using linear regression models and mixed effects models. At baseline, the mean age was 67.86 ± 14.20 years, with a mean follow-up time among those with repeat visits of 4.24 ± 1.70 years. Women (53%) were younger (66.85 ± 13.78 vs. 69.04 ± 14.61 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher fungiform papillae density than men (16.14 ± 9.54 vs. 13.77 ± 8.61 papillae/cm2, p < 0.001). Whites (67%) had a lower fungiform papillae density than non-Whites after adjusting for age and sex. Factors cross-sectionally associated with a lower fungiform papillae density included a higher waist-hip ratio (β = -8.525, p = 0.029), current smoking status (β = -5.133, p = 0.014), and alcohol use within the past 12 months (β = -1.571, p = 0.025). Longitudinally, fungiform papillae density decreased linearly with follow-up time (β = -0.646, p < 0.001). The rate of decline was not affected by sex, race, BMI, waist-hip ratio, smoking, or alcohol use. The longitudinal decline of fungiform papillae density over time needs to be explored further in order to identify other possible age-associated physiological determinants.Entities:
Keywords: aging; fungiform papillae; longitudinal; taste; taste buds
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34857670 PMCID: PMC8714156 DOI: 10.18632/aging.203741
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1(A) Method to assess fungiform papillae density. Blue food coloring is used to provide optimal contrast between fungiform papillae (do not take up blue dye and appear pink) and other tongue structures (coated blue). Two clear plastic hole reinforcement templates (7 mm in diameter) are placed posterior to the apex of the tongue on each side of the median sulcus. Tongue images containing the two templates were taken using a digital camera. The fungiform papillae present within the two 7 mm holes were then counted and normalized to the area of the holes and expressed as fungiform papillae density (number of fungiform papillae/cm2). (B) Representative tongue images from 16 participants with age spans from the 20s to the 90s. As shown, fungiform papillae density varies widely among individuals and across lifespan. The top panel shows individuals with higher fungiform papillae density versus those individuals with lower fungiform papillae density in the lower panel.
Characteristics of study population at baseline visit classified by sex.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| Fungiform papillae density, number/cm2 | 16.14 ± 9.54 | 13.77 ± 8.61 | 15.04 ± 9.19 |
|
| |||
| Age, years | 66.85 ± 13.78 | 69.04 ± 14.61 | 67.86 ± 14.20 |
| Follow-up time, years* | 4.28 ± 1.69 | 4.19 ± 1.72 | 4.24 ± 1.70 |
| Number of visits* | 3.02 ± 1.14 | 3.07 ± 1.23 | 3.04 ± 1.18 |
| Whites, % | 62.52 | 72.08 | 66.97 |
|
| |||
| BMIc, kg/m2 | 26.93 ± 5.17 | 27.56 ± 4.1 | 27.23 ± 4.71 |
| % Obese (BMI >30kg/m2) | 25.04 | 23.76 | 24.45 |
| Waist hip ratio | 0.80 ± 0.07 | 0.93 ± 0.07 | 0.86 ± 0.10 |
|
| |||
| Smokers, % | |||
| -Never smokers | 68.35 | 62.82 | 65.77 |
| -Quit more than 10 years ago | 27.48 | 33 | 30.06 |
| -Quit less than 10 years ago | 3.13 | 1.79 | 2.5 |
| -Current smoker | 1.04 | 2.39 | 1.67 |
| Pack yearsa | 4.08 ± 9.84 | 8.26 ± 17.96 | 6.03 ± 14.36 |
|
| |||
| Used alcohol in past 12 months, % | 79.48 | 85.17 | 82.12 |
| Alcoholic drinks in a typical week, continuousb | 0.96 ± 1.14 | 1.43 ± 1.35 | 1.18 ± 1.26 |
|
| |||
| 0 to 1 | 71.55 | 54.51 | 63.62 |
| 2 to 3 | 26.18 | 39.08 | 32.18 |
| 4 or more | 2.27 | 6.41 | 4.2 |
Values reported are mean ± SD or percentages. *Among those with repeat visits. aAmong smokers. bAmong those who drink alcohol. cBMI: body mass index.
Cross-sectional associations with fungiform papillae density at baseline.
|
|
| |
|
| ||
| Age | –0.181 | <0.001 |
| Sex (ref = women) | –1.840 | 0.001 |
| Race (ref = non-White) | –1.435 | 0.012 |
|
| ||
| Body mass indexb | 0.076 | 0.178 |
| Obesity (BMI > 30kg/m2) | 0.653 | 0.211 |
| Waist hip ratio | –8.525 | 0.029 |
|
| ||
| Smoking statusc | ||
| Never smokers | Ref | Ref |
| Quit more than 10 years ago | –0.675 | 0.258 |
| Quit less than 10 years ago | –3.693 | 0.031 |
| Current smoker | –5.133 | 0.014 |
| Pack years of smoking | –0.023 | 0.220 |
|
| ||
| Used alcohol in past 12 months | –1.571 | 0.025 |
| Alcoholic drinks in the past 12 months, continuous | -0.093 | 0.675 |
|
| ||
| 0 to 1 | Ref | Ref |
| 2 to 3 | –0.689 | 0.251 |
| 4 or more | 0.525 | 0.699 |
aAll models were adjusted for age and sex. bSeparate age and sex adjusted models were created for each of the variables listed above. cSmoking status was analyzed as an indicator variable, with never smokers as the baseline category.
Mixed effects models showing longitudinal associations of anthropometric measures.
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Entry age | –0.181 | <0.001 | –0.166 | <0.001 | –0.180 | <0.001 | –0.176 | <0.001 |
| Time | –0.646 | <0.001 | –0.502 | <0.001 | –0.645 | <0.001 | –1.596 | 0.001 |
| Sex (ref = women) | –1.342 | 0.002 | –5.077 | 0.006 | –1.347 | 0.002 | –0.794 | 0.107 |
| Race (ref = non-White) | –1.869 | <0.001 | –1.739 | <0.001 | –1.798 | <0.001 | –1.857 | <0.001 |
|
| ||||||||
| BMI | –0.750 | 0.453 | ||||||
| Obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2) | –0.011 | 0.933 | ||||||
| Waist hip ratio | 1.057 | 0.057 | ||||||
| Constant | 29.207 | <0.001 | 27.777 | <0.001 | 28.933 | <0.001 | 34.505 | <0.001 |
Entry age is the age at baseline. BMI: body mass index. ‘X’ indicates an interaction term.
Figure 2Longitudinal changes in fungiform papillae density in men and women. The figure shows that men and women have decreasing fungiform papillae density over age and time, and the longitudinal rate of decline in men and women is the same.
Mixed effects models showing longitudinal associations of smoking measures.
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Entry age | –0.181 | <0.001 | –0.183 | <0.001 | –0.179 | <0.001 |
| Time | –0.646 | <0.001 | –0.656 | <0.001 | –0.670 | <0.001 |
| Sex (ref = women) | –1.342 | 0.002 | –1.337 | 0.002 | –1.304 | 0.003 |
| Race (ref = non-White) | –1.869 | <0.001 | –1.908 | <0.001 | –1.866 | <0.001 |
|
| ||||||
| Smoking status | ||||||
| Never | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Quit > 10 years ago | –0.028 | 0.822 | ||||
| Quit < 10 years ago | 0.565 | 0.335 | ||||
| Current smoker | –0.078 | 0.893 | ||||
| Pack years | 0.004 | 0.350 | ||||
| Constant | 29.207 | <0.001 | 29.571 | <0.001 | 29.142 | <0.001 |
Entry age is the age at baseline. ‘X’ indicates an interaction term. Since we were interested mainly in the longitudinal effects over time, only the time interaction terms for the smoking measures are reported in the table above. Separate models were created for each of the smoking measures – one model with the categorical smoking status, and one model with the continuous variable Pack years.
Mixed effects model showing multivariate longitudinal associations.
|
| ||
|
|
| |
| Entry age | –0.183 | <0.001 |
| Time | –0.289 | 0.396 |
| Sex (ref = women) | –1.357 | 0.002 |
| Race (ref = non-White) | –1.776 | <0.001 |
| BMI | 0.055 | 0.305 |
| BMI x Time | –0.010 | 0.371 |
|
| ||
| Former smoker | Ref | Ref |
| Quit > 10 years ago | –0.419 | 0.432 |
| Quit < 10 years ago | –1.925 | 0.220 |
| Current smoker | –4.099 | 0.037 |
|
| ||
| Former smoker | Ref | Ref |
| Quit > 10 years ago | 0.004 | 0.973 |
| Quit < 10 years ago | 0.596 | 0.310 |
| Current smoker | –0.073 | 0.899 |
| Alcohol use | –0.182 | 0.759 |
| Alcohol use X Time | –0.123 | 0.410 |
| Constant | 28.121 | <0.001 |
BMI: body mass index.
Mixed effects models showing longitudinal associations of alcohol use measures.
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Entry age | –0.181 | <0.001 | –0.182 | <0.001 | –0.168 | <0.001 | –0.168 | <0.001 |
| Time | –0.646 | <0.001 | –0.550 | <0.001 | –0.663 | <0.001 | –0.654 | <0.001 |
| Sex (ref = women) | –1.342 | 0.002 | –1.344 | 0.002 | –1.481 | 0.033 | –1.495 | 0.002 |
| Race (ref = non-White) | –1.869 | <0.001 | –1.782 | 0.006 | –1.463 | 0.002 | –1.465 | 0.005 |
|
| ||||||||
| Alcohol use, yes or no | –0.120 | 0.414 | ||||||
| Drinks in a typical week, continuous | 0.004 | 0.940 | ||||||
| Drinks in a week, categorical | ||||||||
| 0 or 1 | Ref | Ref | ||||||
| 2 or 3 | 0.049 | 0.695 | ||||||
| 4 or more | –0.072 | 0.797 | ||||||
| Constant | 29.207 | <0.001 | 27.933 | <0.001 | 23.151 | <0.001 | 29.13911 | <0.001 |
Entry age is the age at baseline. ‘X’ indicates an interaction term. Since we were interested mainly in the longitudinal effects over time, only the time interaction terms for the alcohol use measures are reported in the table above. Separate models were created for each of the alcohol use measures – one model for “Alcohol use, yes or no”, one model for “Drinks in a typical week, continuous”, and one model for “Drinks in a week, categorical”.