Literature DB >> 27287364

New chemosensory component in the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES): first-year results for measured olfactory dysfunction.

Howard J Hoffman1, Shristi Rawal2,3, Chuan-Ming Li1, Valerie B Duffy4.   

Abstract

The U.S. NHANES included chemosensory assessments in the 2011-2014 protocol. We provide an overview of this protocol and 2012 olfactory exam findings. Of the 1818 NHANES participants aged ≥40 years, 1281 (70.5 %) completed the exam; non-participation mostly was due to time constraints. Health technicians administered an 8-item, forced-choice, odor identification task scored as normosmic (6-8 odors identified correctly) versus olfactory dysfunction, including hyposmic (4-5 correct) and anosmic/severe hyposmic (0-3 correct). Interviewers recorded self-reported smell alterations (during past year, since age 25, phantosmia), histories of sinonasal problems, xerostomia, dental extractions, head or facial trauma, and chemosensory-related treatment and changes in quality of life. Olfactory dysfunction was found in 12.4 % (13.3 million adults; 55 % males/45 % females) including 3.2 % anosmic/severe hyposmic (3.4 million; 74 % males/26 % females). Selected age-specific prevalences were 4.2 % (40-49 years), 12.7 % (60-69 years), and 39.4 % (80+ years). Among adults ≥70 years, misidentification rates for warning odors were 20.3 % for smoke and 31.3 % for natural gas. The highest sensitivity (correctly identifying dysfunction) and specificity (correctly identifying normosmia) of self-reported olfactory alteration was among anosmics/severe hyposmics (54.4 % and 78.1 %, respectively). In age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression analysis, risk factors of olfactory dysfunction were racial/ethnic minority, income-to-poverty ratio ≤ 1.1, education <high school, and heavy drinking. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity reduced risk of impairment. Olfactory dysfunction is prevalent, particularly among older adults. Inexpensive, brief odor identification tests coupled with questions (smell problems past year, since age 25, phantosmia) could screen for marked dysfunction. Healthcare providers should be prepared to offer education on non-olfactory avoidance of hazardous events.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Health status; Olfaction disorders; Public health surveillance; Risk factors; Taste

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27287364      PMCID: PMC5033684          DOI: 10.1007/s11154-016-9364-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord        ISSN: 1389-9155            Impact factor:   6.514


  85 in total

1.  Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake.

Authors:  M E Dinehart; J E Hayes; L M Bartoshuk; S L Lanier; V B Duffy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-12-20

2.  Test-retest reliability of the San Diego Odor Identification Test and comparison with the brief smell identification test.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Krantz; C R Schubert; D S Dalton; W Zhong; G H Huang; B E K Klein; R Klein; F J Nieto; K J Cruickshanks
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center.

Authors:  W S Cain; J F Gent; R B Goodspeed; G Leonard
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Gustation assessment using the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  Susan E Coldwell; Julie A Mennella; Valerie B Duffy; Marcia L Pelchat; James W Griffith; Gregory Smutzer; Beverly J Cowart; Paul A S Breslin; Linda M Bartoshuk; Lloyd Hastings; David Victorson; Howard J Hoffman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Combinations of two odorants of smell identification test for screening of olfactory impairment.

Authors:  Hideaki Shiga; Junpei Yamamoto; Miwa Kitamura; Hideaki Nakagawa; Tomoko Matsubasa; Atsuko Seo; Takaki Miwa
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 1.863

6.  Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults.

Authors:  Claire Murphy; Carla R Schubert; Karen J Cruickshanks; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; David M Nondahl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Indications for tonsillectomy: a 10 year retrospective review.

Authors:  Hetal Harish Patel; Chelsey E Straight; Erik B Lehman; Michelle Tanner; Michele M Carr
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 1.675

8.  Psychosocial correlates of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) ratings in a birth cohort.

Authors:  H M McAnally; R Poulton; R J Hancox; J Prescott; D Welch
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  Associations between taste genetics, oral sensation and alcohol intake.

Authors:  Valerie B Duffy; Julie M Peterson; Linda M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-09-15

10.  Impact of primary Sjogren's syndrome on smell and taste: effect on quality of life.

Authors:  Usama F Kamel; Peter Maddison; Rhiannon Whitaker
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 7.580

View more
  57 in total

1.  Gross Olfaction Before and After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Carlos Zerrweck; Vannia Castañeda Gallardo; Carmen Calleja; Elisa Sepúlveda; Lizbeth Guilber
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Olfactory Dysfunction Predicts Subsequent Dementia in Older U.S. Adults.

Authors:  Dara R Adams; David W Kern; Kristen E Wroblewski; Martha K McClintock; William Dale; Jayant M Pinto
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Chronic Cigarette Smoking Associates Directly and Indirectly with Self-Reported Olfactory Alterations: Analysis of the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Sarah-Grace Glennon; Tania Huedo-Medina; Shristi Rawal; Howard J Hoffman; Mark D Litt; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Factors Associated with Inaccurate Self-Reporting of Olfactory Dysfunction in Older US Adults.

Authors:  Dara R Adams; Kristen E Wroblewski; David W Kern; Michael J Kozloski; William Dale; Martha K McClintock; Jayant M Pinto
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 5.  Anosmia-A Clinical Review.

Authors:  Sanne Boesveldt; Elbrich M Postma; Duncan Boak; Antje Welge-Luessen; Veronika Schöpf; Joel D Mainland; Jeffrey Martens; John Ngai; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Heightened olfactory dysfunction and oral irritation among chronic smokers and heightened propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness among menthol smokers.

Authors:  Valerie B Duffy; Sarah-Grace Glennon; Brittany A Larsen; Shristi Rawal; Cheryl Oncken; Mark D Litt
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-12-14

7.  A Community-Based Study on the Prevalence of Olfactory Dysfunction.

Authors:  Rodney J Schlosser; Vincent M Desiato; Kristina A Storck; Shaun A Nguyen; Jonathan B Hill; Brandon J Washington; Tegan E Noonan; Jensine Lamira; Jennifer K Mulligan; Nicholas R Rowan; Frederick Yoo; Lois J Matthews; Judy R Dubno; Zachary M Soler
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 2.467

8.  Factors Associated With Phantom Odor Perception Among US Adults: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Kathleen E Bainbridge; Danita Byrd-Clark; Donald Leopold
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.223

9.  Sleep and Olfaction among Older Adults.

Authors:  V Eloesa McSorley; Jayant Pinto; L Philip Schumm; Kristen Wroblewski; David Kern; Martha McClintock; Diane S Lauderdale
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 10.  Olfactory Dysfunction in Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Concepció Marin; Dolores Vilas; Cristóbal Langdon; Isam Alobid; Mauricio López-Chacón; Antje Haehner; Thomas Hummel; Joaquim Mullol
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.