Literature DB >> 25630394

Modulation masking release using the Brazilian-Portuguese HINT: psychometric functions and the effect of speech time compression.

John H Grose1, Silvana Griz, Fernando A Pacífico, Karina P Advíncula, Denise C Menezes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Brazilian-Portuguese hearing in noise test (HINT) was used to investigate the benefit to speech recognition of listening in a fluctuating background. The goal was to determine whether modulation masking release varied as a function of the speech-to-masker ratio at threshold. Speech-to-masker ratio at threshold was manipulated using the novel approach of adjusting the time-compression of the speech.
DESIGN: Experiment 1 measured performance-intensity functions in both a steady speech-shaped noise masker and a 10-Hz square-wave modulated masker. Experiment 2 measured speech-to-masker ratios at threshold as a function of time-compression of the speech (0, 33, and 50%) in both maskers. STUDY SAMPLE: Participants were normal-hearing adults who were native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese (Experiment 1: N = 10; Experiment 2: N = 30).
RESULTS: The slope of the performance-intensity function was shallower in the modulated masker than in the steady masker for both words and sentences. Thresholds increased with increasing time-compression in both maskers, but more markedly in the modulated masker, resulting in reduced modulation masking release with increasing time-compression.
CONCLUSIONS: Speech-to-masker ratio at threshold varies with time-compression of speech. The results are relevant to the issue of whether degree of masker modulation benefit depends on speech-to-masker ratio at threshold.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Modulation masking release; psychometric function; speech recognition; time compression

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25630394      PMCID: PMC4464786          DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.986692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  32 in total

1.  Speech perception in quiet and noise using the hearing in noise test and the Japanese hearing in noise test by Japanese listeners.

Authors:  Kaori Nakamura; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson; Rachel McArdle; Heidi Roberts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Masking release for words in amplitude-modulated noise as a function of modulation rate and task.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lisa N Whittle; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine-structure distortion on the fluctuating-masker benefit for speech at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Douglas S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.

Authors:  Claus Christiansen; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Set-size procedures for controlling variations in speech-reception performance with a fluctuating masker.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Van Summers; Nandini Iyer; Douglas S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Cas Smits; Joost M Festen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Age effects in temporal envelope processing: speech unmasking and auditory steady state responses.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  2 in total

1.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Hearing in Noise Test, HINT-Brazil, in normal-hearing children.

Authors:  Carolina Lino Novelli; Nádia Giulian de Carvalho; Maria Francisca Colella-Santos
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.