Literature DB >> 23654404

The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.

Cas Smits1, Joost M Festen.   

Abstract

Following previous work [Smits and Festen. (2011). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 2987-2998] involving the interpretation of speech reception threshold (SRT) data in steady-state noise, the present study considers fluctuating noise. Whereas the SIIsteady function [i.e., the speech intelligibility index (SII) against SNR in steady-state noise] can be approximated by a simple linear function going from 0 to 1 between SNR = -15 dB to +15 dB, the SIIfluc function is a function over a broader range than 30 dB and its maximum lies at a SNR higher than +15 dB. The difference in shape between the SIIsteady and SIIfluc functions has several implications. It predicts a reduction in fluctuating masker benefit (FMB), or even a negative FMB, for higher SNRs for normal-hearing listeners. Experimental data confirm this prediction. Much of the reduction in FMB for hearing-impaired listeners may be attributed to the higher SRTs in steady-state noise for these listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23654404     DOI: 10.1121/1.4798667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Verbal Response Times as a Potential Indicator of Cognitive Load During Conventional Speech Audiometry With Matrix Sentences.

Authors:  Hartmut Meister; Sebastian Rählmann; Ulrike Lemke; Jana Besser
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

2.  Modulation masking release using the Brazilian-Portuguese HINT: psychometric functions and the effect of speech time compression.

Authors:  John H Grose; Silvana Griz; Fernando A Pacífico; Karina P Advíncula; Denise C Menezes
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Effects of linguistic experience on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral masker modulation.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Development of speech glimpsing in synchronously and asynchronously modulated noise.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of response context and masker type on word recognition in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of WDRC release time and number of channels on output SNR and speech recognition.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Katie Masterson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Masked sentence recognition assessed at ascending target-to-masker ratios: modest effects of repeating stimuli.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lauren Calandruccio; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.

Authors:  Kelly Miles; Catherine McMahon; Isabelle Boisvert; Ronny Ibrahim; Peter de Lissa; Petra Graham; Björn Lyxell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.