Literature DB >> 23039460

Set-size procedures for controlling variations in speech-reception performance with a fluctuating masker.

Joshua G W Bernstein1, Van Summers, Nandini Iyer, Douglas S Brungart.   

Abstract

Adaptive signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) tracking is often used to measure speech reception in noise. Because SNR varies with performance using this method, data interpretation can be confounded when measuring an SNR-dependent effect such as the fluctuating-masker benefit (FMB) (the intelligibility improvement afforded by brief dips in the masker level). One way to overcome this confound, and allow FMB comparisons across listener groups with different stationary-noise performance, is to adjust the response set size to equalize performance across groups at a fixed SNR. However, this technique is only valid under the assumption that changes in set size have the same effect on percentage-correct performance for different masker types. This assumption was tested by measuring nonsense-syllable identification for normal-hearing listeners as a function of SNR, set size and masker (stationary noise, 4- and 32-Hz modulated noise and an interfering talker). Set-size adjustment had the same impact on performance scores for all maskers, confirming the independence of FMB (at matched SNRs) and set size. These results, along with those of a second experiment evaluating an adaptive set-size algorithm to adjust performance levels, establish set size as an efficient and effective tool to adjust baseline performance when comparing effects of masker fluctuations between listener groups.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039460      PMCID: PMC3477195          DOI: 10.1121/1.4746019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  40 in total

1.  On a psychophysical transformed-rule up and down method converging on a 75% level of correct responses.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki; E M Relkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart; B D Simpson; M A Ericson; K R Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  R L Freyman; U Balakrishnan; K S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Audibility-index functions for the connected speech test.

Authors:  Robert L Sherbecoe; Gerald A Studebaker
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Note on informational masking.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Uma Balakrishnan; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine-structure distortion on the fluctuating-masker benefit for speech at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Douglas S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Use of a sequential strategy in intelligibility testing.

Authors:  H Levitt; L R Rabiner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modulation masking release using the Brazilian-Portuguese HINT: psychometric functions and the effect of speech time compression.

Authors:  John H Grose; Silvana Griz; Fernando A Pacífico; Karina P Advíncula; Denise C Menezes
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Masking Release for Speech in Modulated Maskers: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Measures.

Authors:  A Michelle Tanner; Emily R Spitzer; J P Hyzy; John H Grose
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Preferred Compression Speed for Speech and Music and Its Relationship to Sensitivity to Temporal Fine Structure.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Aleksander Sęk
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Assessing the benefit of acoustic beamforming for listeners with aphasia using modified psychoacoustic methods.

Authors:  Sarah Villard; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.840

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.