Literature DB >> 22978894

Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.

Claus Christiansen1, Torsten Dau.   

Abstract

In contrast to normal-hearing (NH) listeners, hearing-impaired (HI) listeners often show strongly reduced masking release (MR) in fluctuating interferers, which has commonly been associated with spectral and temporal processing deficits. However, it has recently been proposed that the reduced MR could result from an increased speech recognition threshold (SRT) in stationary noise [Bernstein and Grant, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 3358-3372 (2009)]. This was tested by presenting noise-band vocoded as well as low-pass and high-pass filtered stimuli to NH listeners, thereby increasing their stationary-noise SRTs to those of the HI listeners. If the primary determinant of MR is the SRT in stationary noise then the amount of the MR should be independent of the type of processing used to obtain the stationary-noise SRT. However, the relation between the amount of MR and the stationary-noise SRT depended on the type of processing. For a fluctuating interferer, none of the processing conditions reduced the MR of the NH listeners to that of the HI listeners. In contrast, for an interfering talker, the results for vocoded stimuli were similar to those of the HI listeners. Overall, these results suggest that the observed MR is only partially related to the stationary-noise SRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22978894     DOI: 10.1121/1.4742732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Amplitude fluctuations in a masker influence lexical segmentation in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Trevor T Perry; Bomjun J Kwon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Verbal Response Times as a Potential Indicator of Cognitive Load During Conventional Speech Audiometry With Matrix Sentences.

Authors:  Hartmut Meister; Sebastian Rählmann; Ulrike Lemke; Jana Besser
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Modulation masking release using the Brazilian-Portuguese HINT: psychometric functions and the effect of speech time compression.

Authors:  John H Grose; Silvana Griz; Fernando A Pacífico; Karina P Advíncula; Denise C Menezes
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Abnormal intelligibility of speech in competing speech and in noise in a frequency region where audiometric thresholds are near-normal for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Agnès C Léger; David T Ives; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of linguistic experience on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral masker modulation.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Jörg M Buchholz; Katrina Freeston
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Increase in speech recognition due to linguistic mismatch between target and masker speech: monolingual and simultaneous bilingual performance.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Temporal Fine-Structure Coding and Lateralized Speech Perception in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Gusztáv Lőcsei; Julie H Pedersen; Søren Laugesen; Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau; Ewen N MacDonald
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.