Literature DB >> 19633565

Age effects in temporal envelope processing: speech unmasking and auditory steady state responses.

John H Grose1, Sara K Mamo, Joseph W Hall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether temporal envelope processing is reduced in older listeners. Experiment 1 tested the hypothesis that older listeners exhibit reduced speech unmasking at higher modulation rates. Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that auditory steady state response (ASSR) amplitudes are reduced in older listeners at high modulation rates.
DESIGN: Two groups of observers with relatively normal hearing (younger, mean age = 25.0 years and older, mean age = 68.7 years) participated in two experiments. Experiment 1 examined speech unmasking in modulated noise as a function of masker modulation rate (16 and 32 Hz) and target speech rate (normal and 33% time compressed). Experiment 2 measured ASSR amplitudes as a function of modulation rate (32 and 128 Hz) and carrier frequency (500 and 2000 Hz).
RESULTS: Experiment 1 indicated that older listeners show reduced speech unmasking for normal-rate speech and reduced recognition of rapid speech in steady noise. However, for rapid speech, there is no age effect for speech unmasking and no difference in the magnitude of masking release as a function of modulation rate. In general, effects of listener age and masker modulation rate on the magnitude of masking release are observed only for normal-rate speech. Experiment 2 showed that the ASSR amplitudes of older listeners are reduced for a 128-Hz modulation rate but not for a 32-Hz modulation rate, irrespective of carrier frequency.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the reduced speech unmasking seen in older listeners for relatively slow modulation rates is not caused by deficits in envelope processing but rather is associated with the more constrained redundancy of the speech material available during the masker minima. Deficits in temporal envelope processing are evident in advanced age but only for relatively high envelope frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19633565      PMCID: PMC2739408          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ac128f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  19 in total

1.  MASTER: a Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  M S John; T W Picton
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spectral integration of synchronous and asynchronous cues to consonant identification.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of stimulus and noise rate variability on speech perception by younger and older adults.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Peter J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly.

Authors:  G A Takahashi; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-12

6.  Effects of age, speech rate, and type of test on temporal auditory processing.

Authors:  N E Vaughan; T Letowski
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Sasha M John; Bruce A Schneider; Terence W Picton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comodulation masking release for elderly listeners with relatively normal audiograms.

Authors:  R W Peters; J W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers.

Authors:  Ning-ji He; John H Mills; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  57 in total

1.  Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Bomjun J Kwon; Trevor T Perry; Cassie L Wilhelm; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial selective auditory attention in the presence of reverberant energy: individual differences in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-03

3.  Why middle-aged listeners have trouble hearing in everyday settings.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Inner hair cell ribbon synapse plasticity might be molecular basis of temporary hearing threshold shifts in mice.

Authors:  Haolin Wang; Ning Zhao; Kaisheng Yan; Xiuli Liu; Yue Zhang; Zhijun Hong; Mingyu Wang; Qing Yin; Feifeng Wu; Yu Lei; Xiaoyan Li; Lin Shi; Ke Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-07-01

5.  Forward Masking of the Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Sarah E Hodge; Denise C Menezes; Kevin D Brown; John H Grose
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine-structure distortion on the fluctuating-masker benefit for speech at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Douglas S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Integrating cognitive and peripheral factors in predicting hearing-aid processing effectiveness.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Temporal Processing Deficits in Middle Age.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.