Literature DB >> 21786913

Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine-structure distortion on the fluctuating-masker benefit for speech at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Joshua G W Bernstein1, Douglas S Brungart.   

Abstract

Normal-hearing listeners receive less benefit from momentary dips in the level of a fluctuating masker for speech processed to degrade spectral detail or temporal fine structure (TFS) than for unprocessed speech. This has been interpreted as evidence that the magnitude of the fluctuating-masker benefit (FMB) reflects the ability to resolve spectral detail and TFS. However, the FMB for degraded speech is typically measured at a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to yield performance similar to normal speech for the baseline (stationary-noise) condition. Because the FMB decreases with increasing SNR, this SNR difference might account for the reduction in FMB for degraded speech. In this study, the FMB for unprocessed and processed (TFS-removed or spectrally smeared) speech was measured in a paradigm that adjusts word-set size, rather than SNR, to equate stationary-noise performance across processing conditions. Compared at the same SNR and percent-correct level (but with different set sizes), processed and unprocessed stimuli yielded a similar FMB for four different fluctuating maskers (speech-modulated noise, one opposite-gender interfering talker, two same-gender interfering talkers, and 16-Hz interrupted noise). These results suggest that, for these maskers, spectral or TFS distortions do not directly impair the ability to benefit from momentary dips in masker level.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21786913      PMCID: PMC3155596          DOI: 10.1121/1.3589440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  51 in total

1.  Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Uma Balakrishnan; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Koenraad S Rhebergen; Niek J Versfeld; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of cochlear implant processing and fundamental frequency on the intelligibility of competing sentences.

Authors:  Ginger S Stickney; Peter F Assmann; Janice Chang; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Sarah F Poissant; Richard L Freyman; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses.

Authors:  R Carhart; T W Tillman
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1970-03

7.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds.

Authors:  R Carhart; T W Tillman; E S Greetis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.

Authors:  Van Summers; Michelle R Molis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  24 in total

1.  Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Asynchronous glimpsing of speech: spread of masking and task set-size.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Efficiency in glimpsing vowel sequences in fluctuating makers: Effects of temporal fine structure and temporal regularity.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Dylan V Pearson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Recognition of synthesized vowel sequences in steady-state and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Dylan V Pearson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modulation masking release using the Brazilian-Portuguese HINT: psychometric functions and the effect of speech time compression.

Authors:  John H Grose; Silvana Griz; Fernando A Pacífico; Karina P Advíncula; Denise C Menezes
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Set-size procedures for controlling variations in speech-reception performance with a fluctuating masker.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Van Summers; Nandini Iyer; Douglas S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Intelligibility of whispered speech in stationary and modulated noise maskers.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Amanda M Griffin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of hearing loss on the subcortical representation of speech cues.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Sarah Drehobl; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.