| Literature DB >> 25569235 |
Ayşe Demirkan1, Peter Henneman2, Aswin Verhoeven3, Harish Dharuri2, Najaf Amin4, Jan Bert van Klinken2, Lennart C Karssen4, Boukje de Vries2, Axel Meissner3, Sibel Göraler3, Arn M J M van den Maagdenberg5, André M Deelder3, Peter A C 't Hoen2, Cornelia M van Duijn4, Ko Willems van Dijk6.
Abstract
Metabolite quantitative traits carry great promise for epidemiological studies, and their genetic background has been addressed using Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS). Thus far, the role of less common variants has not been exhaustively studied. Here, we set out a GWAS for metabolite quantitative traits in serum, followed by exome sequence analysis to zoom in on putative causal variants in the associated genes. 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1H-NMR) spectroscopy experiments yielded successful quantification of 42 unique metabolites in 2,482 individuals from The Erasmus Rucphen Family (ERF) study. Heritability of metabolites were estimated by SOLAR. GWAS was performed by linear mixed models, using HapMap imputations. Based on physical vicinity and pathway analyses, candidate genes were screened for coding region variation using exome sequence data. Heritability estimates for metabolites ranged between 10% and 52%. GWAS replicated three known loci in the metabolome wide significance: CPS1 with glycine (P-value = 1.27×10-32), PRODH with proline (P-value = 1.11×10-19), SLC16A9 with carnitine level (P-value = 4.81×10-14) and uncovered a novel association between DMGDH and dimethyl-glycine (P-value = 1.65×10-19) level. In addition, we found three novel, suggestively significant loci: TNP1 with pyruvate (P-value = 1.26×10-8), KCNJ16 with 3-hydroxybutyrate (P-value = 1.65×10-8) and 2p12 locus with valine (P-value = 3.49×10-8). Exome sequence analysis identified potentially causal coding and regulatory variants located in the genes CPS1, KCNJ2 and PRODH, and revealed allelic heterogeneity for CPS1 and PRODH. Combined GWAS and exome analyses of metabolites detected by high-resolution 1H-NMR is a robust approach to uncover metabolite quantitative trait loci (mQTL), and the likely causative variants in these loci. It is anticipated that insight in the genetics of intermediate phenotypes will provide additional insight into the genetics of complex traits.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25569235 PMCID: PMC4287344 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004835
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Genet ISSN: 1553-7390 Impact factor: 6.020
Figure 1Heritability and sibship effects on the NMR metabolites.
Figure shows the magnitude of heritability (H2) and sibship (household) effect estimates for each metabolic trait included in the ERF population.
Figure 2GWAS results of the NMR metabolites.
Figure shows the aggregated Manhattan plot for the 42 metabolites studied. Red line shows the suggestive genome-wide significance level with a P-value of 5×10−8.Loci harbouring DMGDH, SLC16A9, PRODH and CPS1 are reported as metabolome wide significance.
Unique loci that influence the NMR-metabolome.
| Metabolite | SNP | P-value | MAF | Location | CHR | Position | Candidate genes | R2 | Genetic loci within +/- 500KB | eQTL | Metabolite related risk factors in ERF |
| Glycine | rs715 | 1.27×10−32 | 0.34 | 3'UTR | 2 | 211251300 |
| 10.7 | Chronic kidney disease | None | TG, CRP, creatine, eGFR, BMI |
| Proline | rs2540641 | 1.11×10−19 | 0.09 | 33 KB from | 22 | 17339684 |
| 2.9 | Proline levels | None | HDL-C, TG, insulin, BMI |
| Dimethyl-glycineNovel | rs248386 | 1.65×10−19 | 0.15 | intronic | 5 | 78365983 |
| 1.4 | betaine | None | Albumin, resistin, creatin, creatinine, eGFR, urea, uric acid |
| Carnitine | rs1171614 | 4.81×10−14 | 0.18 | 5'UTR | 10 | 61139544 |
| 3.0 | Urate level |
| TG, albumin, leptin, uric acid, BMI |
| PyruvateNovel | rs1922005 | 1.26×10−8 | 0.13 | intronic | 2 | 217441741 |
| 1.8 | Thyroid levels | None | TG, glucose, HOMA-IR, insulin, leptin, PWV, WHR, gynoid fat, BMI |
| 3-HydroxybutyrateNovel | rs9896573 | 1.65×10−8 | 0.09 | 6 KB from | 17 | 65650639 | None | 0.1 | Height | None | Adiponectin, lean mass index, android fat |
| Lysine | rs8056893 | 2.14×10−8 | 0.28 | intronic | 16 | 66861893 |
| 1.5 | Glutaroyl carnitine/lysine |
| TC, HDL-C, glucose, albumin, DBP, CRP, transferrin saturation, fat %, fat mass index, lean mass idex, android fat, BMI |
| ValineNovel | rs11687765 | 3.49×10−8 | 0.44 | intergenic | 2 | 82179042 | None | 0.4 | Bilirubin levels | None | HDL-C, TG, glucose, adiponectine, HOMA-IR, insulin, SBP, PWV, urea, uric acid, ferritin, WHR, gynoid fat, BMI |
*Also associated to creatine (P-value = 1.40×10−8). MD; major depression, CD; Crohn's disease, MetS; metabolic syndrome, CHD; coronary heart disease. CRP; C-reactive protein, eGFR; glomerular filtration rate, PWV, pulse wave velocity. Phenotypes are shown that are associated with loci reported in GWAS catalog [22] and that lie within a 500 kb window of the main locus, regardless of linkage disequilibrium. Candidate genes 500 kb window around the best associated SNP were selected by automated workflow based on metabolic pathway information (see methods). eQTL lookups were perfomed in GTEX and GEUVADIS databases. Chr; chromosome; MAF; minor allele frequency; SNP; single nucleotide polymorphism; R2; Explained variance in metabolite level by the top SNP, eQTL; expression quantitative trait loci.
Sequence variants within the coding regions of candidate genes that influence the metabolomic levels independent of the GWAS hits.
| Conditional analysis | ||||||||||||||||
| Metabolite | SNP | CHR | Position | A1 | A2 | Beta | SE | P-valuea | Function | GENE | MAF | P-valueb | P-valuec | LD(r2) | Proxy SNPs | |
| Glycine | rs1047891 | 2 | 211540507 | C | A | 0.61 | 0.06 | 8.75×10−26 | Missense |
| 0.24 | 8.07×10−9 | 4.05×10−1 | 0.92 | * | |
| Glycine | rs182548513 | 2 | 211455113 | G | C | −0.48 | 0.17 | 7.93×10−3 | Intron |
| 0.02 | 2.55E×10−5 | 6.34×10−22 | 0.00 | rs147937942, rs143738855 | |
| 3-Hydroxybuyrate | rs173135 | 17 | 68172326 | C | T | 0.40 | 0.08 | 1.50×10−7 | 3′ UTR |
| 0.11 | 2.46×10−3 | 3.11×10−1 | 0.72 | * | |
| Proline | rs5747933 | 22 | 18910355 | G | T | 0.88 | 0.14 | 1.82×10−9 | Missense |
| 0.03 | 7.30×10−9 | 2.89×10−8 | 0.04 | rs2277834, rs4269009 | |
| Proline | rs1076466 | 22 | 18907124 | G | A | −0.17 | 0.05 | 6.34×10−4 | Intron |
| 0.50 | 6.09×10−6 | 1.23×10−11 | 0.07 | rs2008720, rs2008912 | |
| Proline | rs13058335 | 22 | 18910479 | C | T | 0.66 | 0.09 | 2.46×10−13 | Intron |
| 0.07 | 1.20×10−5 | 4.32×10−1 | 0.66 | * | |
| Proline | rs3213491 | 22 | 19164835 | A | C | 0.38 | 0.11 | 7.48×10−4 | Intron |
| 0.05 | 8.47×10−5 | 4.00×10−10 | 0.00 | ||
A1; affect allele, A2; other allele, beta; effect estimate, SE; standard error of beta, P-value a; p value of the association between the SNP and the metabolite, P-value b; p-value of the association between the SNP and the metabolite, adjusted by the GWAS SNP, P-value c; p-value of the association between the GWAS SNP and the metabolite, adjusted by the SNP.*Loci in which the GWAS is explained by the SNPs within the genes. Selection of significance for SNPs is based on P-value b. Chr; chromosome; LD; linkage disequilibrium; MAF; minor allele frequency; SNP; single nucleotide polymorphism; eQTL; expression quantitative trait loci.