Literature DB >> 25561333

Neural representation of probabilities for Bayesian inference.

Dylan Rich1, Fanny Cazettes, Yunyan Wang, José Luis Peña, Brian J Fischer.   

Abstract

Bayesian models are often successful in describing perception and behavior, but the neural representation of probabilities remains in question. There are several distinct proposals for the neural representation of probabilities, but they have not been directly compared in an example system. Here we consider three models: a non-uniform population code where the stimulus-driven activity and distribution of preferred stimuli in the population represent a likelihood function and a prior, respectively; the sampling hypothesis which proposes that the stimulus-driven activity over time represents a posterior probability and that the spontaneous activity represents a prior; and the class of models which propose that a population of neurons represents a posterior probability in a distributed code. It has been shown that the non-uniform population code model matches the representation of auditory space generated in the owl's external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICx). However, the alternative models have not been tested, nor have the three models been directly compared in any system. Here we tested the three models in the owl's ICx. We found that spontaneous firing rate and the average stimulus-driven response of these neurons were not consistent with predictions of the sampling hypothesis. We also found that neural activity in ICx under varying levels of sensory noise did not reflect a posterior probability. On the other hand, the responses of ICx neurons were consistent with the non-uniform population code model. We further show that Bayesian inference can be implemented in the non-uniform population code model using one spike per neuron when the population is large and is thus able to support the rapid inference that is necessary for sound localization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25561333      PMCID: PMC4372535          DOI: 10.1007/s10827-014-0545-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  27 in total

1.  Representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands.

Authors:  J I Gold; M N Shadlen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts.

Authors:  Yair Weiss; Eero P Simoncelli; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Doubly distributional population codes: simultaneous representation of uncertainty and multiplicity.

Authors:  Maneesh Sahani; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Neural representation of probabilistic information.

Authors:  M J Barber; J W Clark; C H Anderson
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Sensitivity to spectral interaural intensity difference cues in space-specific neurons of the barn owl.

Authors:  B J Arthur
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  From postsynaptic potentials to spikes in the genesis of auditory spatial receptive fields.

Authors:  Jose Luis Pena; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Prediction of auditory spatial acuity from neural images on the owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  Avinash D S Bala; Matthew W Spitzer; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Protean behavior under barn-owl attack: voles alternate between freezing and fleeing and spiny mice flee in alternating patterns.

Authors:  Shahaf Edut; David Eilam
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Population-wide bias of surround suppression in auditory spatial receptive fields of the owl's midbrain.

Authors:  Yunyan Wang; Sharad J Shanbhag; Brian J Fischer; José L Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Efficient sensory encoding and Bayesian inference with heterogeneous neural populations.

Authors:  Deep Ganguli; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.026

View more
  8 in total

1.  Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Jose L Peña; Fanny Cazettes; Michael V Beckert; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Emergence of an Adaptive Command for Orienting Behavior in Premotor Brainstem Neurons of Barn Owls.

Authors:  Fanny Cazettes; Brian J Fischer; Michael V Beckert; Jose L Pena
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cue Reliability Represented in the Shape of Tuning Curves in the Owl's Sound Localization System.

Authors:  Fanny Cazettes; Brian J Fischer; Jose L Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Development of a Bayesian Estimator for Audio-Visual Integration: A Neurocomputational Study.

Authors:  Mauro Ursino; Andrea Crisafulli; Giuseppe di Pellegrino; Elisa Magosso; Cristiano Cuppini
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Investigating the representation of uncertainty in neuronal circuits.

Authors:  Guillaume P Dehaene; Ruben Coen-Cagli; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Similar network compositions, but distinct neural dynamics underlying belief updating in environments with and without explicit outcomes.

Authors:  Vincenzo G Fiore; Xiaosi Gu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 7.400

7.  How the known reference weakens the visual oblique effect: a Bayesian account of cognitive improvement by cue influence.

Authors:  Renyu Ye; Xinsheng Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Natural ITD statistics predict human auditory spatial perception.

Authors:  Rodrigo Pavão; Elyse S Sussman; Brian J Fischer; José L Peña
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.