Literature DB >> 12097516

From postsynaptic potentials to spikes in the genesis of auditory spatial receptive fields.

Jose Luis Pena1, Masakazu Konishi.   

Abstract

Space-specific neurons in the owl's inferior colliculus respond only to a sound coming from a particular direction, which is equivalent to a specific combination of interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD). Comparison of subthreshold postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) and spike output for the same neurons showed that receptive fields measured in PSPs were much larger than those measured in spikes in both ITD and ILD dimensions. Space-specific neurons fire more spikes for a particular ITD than for its phase equivalents (ITD +/- 1/F, where F is best frequency). This differential response was much less pronounced in PSPs. The two sides of pyramid-shaped ILD curves were more symmetrical in spikes than in PSPs. Furthermore, monaural stimuli that were ineffective in eliciting spikes induced subthreshold PSPs. The main cause of these changes between PSPs and spikes is thresholding. The spiking threshold did not vary with the kind of acoustic stimuli presented. However, the thresholds of sound-induced first spikes were lower than those of later sound-induced and spontaneous spikes. This change in threshold may account for the sharpening of ITD selectivity during the stimulus. Large changes in receptive fields across single neurons are not unique to the owl's space-specific neurons but occur in mammalian visual and somatosensory cortices, suggesting the existence of general principles in the formation of receptive fields in high-order neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12097516      PMCID: PMC6758218          DOI: 20026572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  34 in total

1.  Comparison of the selectivity of postsynaptic potentials and spike responses in cat visual cortex.

Authors:  M Volgushev; J Pernberg; U T Eysel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Membrane potential and firing rate in cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  M Carandini; D Ferster
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Neuromodulation of Na+ channels: an unexpected form of cellular plasticity.

Authors:  A R Cantrell; W A Catterall
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Responses of neurons in the auditory pathway of the barn owl to partially correlated binaural signals.

Authors:  Y Albeck; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Selectivity for interaural time difference in the owl's midbrain.

Authors:  T Takahashi; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Binaural characteristics of units in the owl's brainstem auditory pathway: precursors of restricted spatial receptive fields.

Authors:  A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons.

Authors:  J Allman; F Miezin; E McGuinness
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl.

Authors:  T Takahashi; A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A biotin-containing compound N-(2-aminoethyl)biotinamide for intracellular labeling and neuronal tracing studies: comparison with biocytin.

Authors:  H Kita; W Armstrong
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  30 in total

1.  Logarithmic compression of sensory signals within the dendritic tree of a collision-sensitive neuron.

Authors:  Peter W Jones; Fabrizio Gabbiani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Spike timing precision changes with spike rate adaptation in the owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  Clifford H Keller; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Axodendritic contacts onto calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II-expressing neurons in the barn owl auditory space map.

Authors:  Adrian Rodriguez-Contreras; Xiao-Bo Liu; William M DeBello
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  GABAergic inhibition controls neural gain in inferior colliculus neurons sensitive to interaural time differences.

Authors:  Neil J Ingham; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.

Authors:  María Lucía Pérez; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Behavioral guides for sensory neurophysiology.

Authors:  M Konishi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Noise reduction of coincidence detector output by the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

Authors:  G Björn Christianson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Timing of sound-evoked potentials and spike responses in the inferior colliculus of awake bats.

Authors:  S V Voytenko; A V Galazyuk
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Predicting spike timing in highly synchronous auditory neurons at different sound levels.

Authors:  Bertrand Fontaine; Victor Benichoux; Philip X Joris; Romain Brette
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Variability reduction in interaural time difference tuning in the barn owl.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.