Literature DB >> 22855796

Population-wide bias of surround suppression in auditory spatial receptive fields of the owl's midbrain.

Yunyan Wang1, Sharad J Shanbhag, Brian J Fischer, José L Peña.   

Abstract

The physical arrangement of receptive fields (RFs) within neural structures is important for local computations. Nonuniform distribution of tuning within populations of neurons can influence emergent tuning properties, causing bias in local processing. This issue was studied in the auditory system of barn owls. The owl's external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICx) contains a map of auditory space in which the frontal region is overrepresented. We measured spatiotemporal RFs of ICx neurons using spatial white noise. We found a population-wide bias in surround suppression such that suppression from frontal space was stronger. This asymmetry increased with laterality in spatial tuning. The bias could be explained by a model of lateral inhibition based on the overrepresentation of frontal space observed in ICx. The model predicted trends in surround suppression across ICx that matched the data. Thus, the uneven distribution of spatial tuning within the map could explain the topography of time-dependent tuning properties. This mechanism may have significant implications for the analysis of natural scenes by sensory systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22855796      PMCID: PMC3447633          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0047-12.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  78 in total

1.  Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  M P Sceniak; D L Ringach; M J Hawken; R Shapley
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Characterization of external ear impulse responses using Golay codes.

Authors:  B Zhou; D M Green; J C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Influence of temporal cues on acoustic motion-direction sensitivity of auditory neurons in the owl.

Authors:  H Wagner; T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Binaural cross-correlation predicts the responses of neurons in the owl's auditory space map under conditions simulating summing localization.

Authors:  C H Keller; T T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Topographic maps are fundamental to sensory processing.

Authors:  J H Kaas
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  White-noise analysis of a neuron chain: an application of the Wiener theory.

Authors:  P Z Marmarelis; K Naka
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-03-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl.

Authors:  T Takahashi; A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Visual receptive field properties of neurons in the superficial superior colliculus of the mouse.

Authors:  Lupeng Wang; Rashmi Sarnaik; Krsna Rangarajan; Xiaorong Liu; Jianhua Cang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Topography of visual and somatosensory projections to mouse superior colliculus.

Authors:  U C Dräger; D H Hubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba).

Authors:  R S Payne
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  12 in total

1.  Direction selectivity mediated by adaptation in the owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Yunyan Wang; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Spatial receptive field shift by preceding cross-modal stimulation in the cat superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jinghong Xu; Tingting Bi; Jing Wu; Fanzhu Meng; Kun Wang; Jiawei Hu; Xiao Han; Jiping Zhang; Xiaoming Zhou; Les Keniston; Liping Yu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Neural representation of probabilities for Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Dylan Rich; Fanny Cazettes; Yunyan Wang; José Luis Peña; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Stimulus-specific adaptation to visual but not auditory motion direction in the barn owl's optic tectum.

Authors:  Dante F Wasmuht; Jose L Pena; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Barn Owl's Auditory Space Map Activity Matching Conditions for a Population Vector Readout to Drive Adaptive Sound-Localizing Behavior.

Authors:  Roland Ferger; Keanu Shadron; Brian J Fischer; José L Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 6.  New perspectives on the owl's map of auditory space.

Authors:  Jose L Pena; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Emergence of an Adaptive Command for Orienting Behavior in Premotor Brainstem Neurons of Barn Owls.

Authors:  Fanny Cazettes; Brian J Fischer; Michael V Beckert; Jose L Pena
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Cue Reliability Represented in the Shape of Tuning Curves in the Owl's Sound Localization System.

Authors:  Fanny Cazettes; Brian J Fischer; Jose L Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Coding space-time stimulus dynamics in auditory brain maps.

Authors:  Yunyan Wang; Yoram Gutfreund; José L Peña
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Optimal Prediction of Moving Sound Source Direction in the Owl.

Authors:  Weston Cox; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.