Literature DB >> 25058702

Efficient sensory encoding and Bayesian inference with heterogeneous neural populations.

Deep Ganguli1, Eero P Simoncelli.   

Abstract

The efficient coding hypothesis posits that sensory systems maximize information transmitted to the brain about the environment. We develop a precise and testable form of this hypothesis in the context of encoding a sensory variable with a population of noisy neurons, each characterized by a tuning curve. We parameterize the population with two continuous functions that control the density and amplitude of the tuning curves, assuming that the tuning widths vary inversely with the cell density. This parameterization allows us to solve, in closed form, for the information-maximizing allocation of tuning curves as a function of the prior probability distribution of sensory variables. For the optimal population, the cell density is proportional to the prior, such that more cells with narrower tuning are allocated to encode higher-probability stimuli and that each cell transmits an equal portion of the stimulus probability mass. We also compute the stimulus discrimination capabilities of a perceptual system that relies on this neural representation and find that the best achievable discrimination thresholds are inversely proportional to the sensory prior. We examine how the prior information that is implicitly encoded in the tuning curves of the optimal population may be used for perceptual inference and derive a novel decoder, the Bayesian population vector, that closely approximates a Bayesian least-squares estimator that has explicit access to the prior. Finally, we generalize these results to sigmoidal tuning curves, correlated neural variability, and a broader class of objective functions. These results provide a principled embedding of sensory prior information in neural populations and yield predictions that are readily testable with environmental, physiological, and perceptual data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25058702      PMCID: PMC4167880          DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  49 in total

1.  Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code.

Authors:  A L Fairhall; G D Lewen; W Bialek; R R de Ruyter Van Steveninck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Inference and computation with population codes.

Authors:  Alexandre Pouget; Peter Dayan; Richard S Zemel
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  THE VARIABILITY OF CENTRAL NEURAL ACTIVITY IN A SENSORY SYSTEM, AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CENTRAL REFLECTION OF SENSORY EVENTS.

Authors:  G WERNER; V B MOUNTCASTLE
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1963-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Optimal neuronal tuning for finite stimulus spaces.

Authors:  W Michael Brown; Alex Bäcker
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Maximally informative stimuli and tuning curves for sigmoidal rate-coding neurons and populations.

Authors:  Mark D McDonnell; Nigel G Stocks
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Vector reconstruction from firing rates.

Authors:  E Salinas; L F Abbott
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computation, and information coding.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; A B Schwartz; R E Kettner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Normalization as a canonical neural computation.

Authors:  Matteo Carandini; David J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Implicit encoding of prior probabilities in optimal neural populations.

Authors:  Deep Ganguli; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2010
View more
  47 in total

1.  A Bayesian observer model constrained by efficient coding can explain 'anti-Bayesian' percepts.

Authors:  Xue-Xin Wei; Alan A Stocker
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Explaining the especially pink elephant.

Authors:  Jonathan W Pillow
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Origin of information-limiting noise correlations.

Authors:  Ingmar Kanitscheider; Ruben Coen-Cagli; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Perceptual learning in the developing auditory cortex.

Authors:  Shaowen Bao
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Diverse cortical codes for scene segmentation in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Brian H Scott; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Theory of cortical function.

Authors:  David J Heeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Variable precision in visual perception.

Authors:  Shan Shen; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Neural representation of probabilities for Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Dylan Rich; Fanny Cazettes; Yunyan Wang; José Luis Peña; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 9.  Correlations and Neuronal Population Information.

Authors:  Adam Kohn; Ruben Coen-Cagli; Ingmar Kanitscheider; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Efficient sampling and noisy decisions.

Authors:  Joseph A Heng; Michael Woodford; Rafael Polania
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.