Literature DB >> 25480084

Discrimination of partial from whole ultrasonic vocalizations using a go/no-go task in mice.

David P Holfoth1, Erikson G Neilans1, Micheal L Dent1.   

Abstract

Mice are a commonly used model in hearing research, yet little is known about how they perceive conspecific ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs). Humans and birds can distinguish partial versions of a communication signal, and discrimination is superior when the beginning of the signal is present compared to the end of the signal. Since these effects occur in both humans and birds, it was hypothesized that mice would display similar facilitative effects with the initial portions of their USVs. Laboratory mice were tested on a discrimination task using operant conditioning procedures. The mice were required to discriminate incomplete versions of a USV target from a repeating background containing the whole USV. The results showed that the mice had difficulty discriminating incomplete USVs from whole USVs, especially when the beginning of the USVs were presented. This finding suggests that the mice perceive the initial portions of a USV as more similar to the whole USV than the latter parts of the USV, similar to results from humans and birds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25480084      PMCID: PMC4257972          DOI: 10.1121/1.4900564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Efficient encoding of vocalizations in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Lars A Holmstrom; Lonneke B M Eeuwes; Patrick D Roberts; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Sex and parental experience determine the onset of an instinctive behavior in mice.

Authors:  G Ehret; M Koch; B Haack; H Markl
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1987-01

3.  Development of absolute auditory thresholds in the house mouse (Mus musculus).

Authors:  G Ehret
Journal:  J Am Audiol Soc       Date:  1976 Mar-Apr

4.  Engineered deafness reveals that mouse courtship vocalizations do not require auditory experience.

Authors:  Elena J Mahrt; David J Perkel; Ling Tong; Edwin W Rubel; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Behaviorally measured audiograms and gap detection thresholds in CBA/CaJ mice.

Authors:  Kelly E Radziwon; Kristie M June; Daniel J Stolzberg; Matthew A Xu-Friedman; Richard J Salvi; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The feature-positive effect in adult human subjects.

Authors:  J Newman; W T Wolff; E Hearst
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-09

7.  The mouse as a model for human audition. A review of the literature.

Authors:  K R Henry; M D McGinn
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1992

8.  Cross fostering experiments suggest that mice songs are innate.

Authors:  Takefumi Kikusui; Kaori Nakanishi; Ryoko Nakagawa; Miho Nagasawa; Kazutaka Mogi; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Discrimination of ultrasonic vocalizations by CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus) is related to spectrotemporal dissimilarity of vocalizations.

Authors:  Erikson G Neilans; David P Holfoth; Kelly E Radziwon; Christine V Portfors; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Automated classification of mouse pup isolation syllables: from cluster analysis to an Excel-based "mouse pup syllable classification calculator".

Authors:  Jasmine M S Grimsley; Marie A Gadziola; Jeffrey J Wenstrup
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  10 in total

1.  Discrimination of frequency modulated sweeps by mice.

Authors:  Laurel A Screven; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Blast trauma affects production and perception of mouse ultrasonic vocalizations.

Authors:  Kali Burke; Kathleen A Ohman; Senthilvelan Manohar; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Eliciting and Analyzing Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization (USV) Songs.

Authors:  Jonathan Chabout; Joshua Jones-Macopson; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Determining Ultrasonic Vocalization Preferences in Mice using a Two-choice Playback Test.

Authors:  Akari Asaba; Masahiro Kato; Nobuyoshi Koshida; Takefumi Kikusui
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  The effects of aging and sex on detection of ultrasonic vocalizations by adult CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Intensity difference limens in adult CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Katrina L Toal; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Best sensitivity of temporal modulation transfer functions in laboratory mice matches the amplitude modulation embedded in vocalizations.

Authors:  Huaizhen Cai; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Perception of Ultrasonic Vocalizations by Socially Housed and Isolated Mice.

Authors:  Laurel A Screven; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-10-15

9.  Phase-Specific Vocalizations of Male Mice at the Initial Encounter during the Courtship Sequence.

Authors:  Yui K Matsumoto; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Early-Life Stress Paradigm Transiently Alters Maternal Behavior, Dam-Pup Interactions, and Offspring Vocalizations in Mice.

Authors:  Hanke Heun-Johnson; Pat Levitt
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.558

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.