Literature DB >> 20089889

Efficient encoding of vocalizations in the auditory midbrain.

Lars A Holmstrom1, Lonneke B M Eeuwes, Patrick D Roberts, Christine V Portfors.   

Abstract

An important question in sensory neuroscience is what coding strategies and mechanisms are used by the brain to detect and discriminate among behaviorally relevant stimuli. There is evidence that sensory systems migrate from a distributed and redundant encoding strategy at the periphery to a more heterogeneous encoding in cortical structures. It has been hypothesized that heterogeneity is an efficient encoding strategy that minimizes the redundancy of the neural code and maximizes information throughput. Evidence of this mechanism has been documented in cortical structures. In this study, we examined whether heterogeneous encoding of complex sounds contributes to efficient encoding in the auditory midbrain by characterizing neural responses to behaviorally relevant vocalizations in the mouse inferior colliculus (IC). We independently manipulated the frequency, amplitude, duration, and harmonic structure of the vocalizations to create a suite of modified vocalizations. Based on measures of both spike rate and timing, we characterized the heterogeneity of neural responses to the natural vocalizations and their perturbed variants. Using information theoretic measures, we found that heterogeneous response properties of IC neurons contribute to efficient encoding of behaviorally relevant vocalizations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20089889      PMCID: PMC6633079          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1964-09.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  62 in total

1.  A novel spike distance.

Authors:  M C van Rossum
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Delay-tuned neurons in the inferior colliculus of the mustached bat: implications for analyses of target distance.

Authors:  C V Portfors; J J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to natural and altered species-specific calls.

Authors:  D D Gehr; H Komiya; J J Eggermont
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Duration tuning in the mouse auditory midbrain.

Authors:  A Brand; R Urban; B Grothe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Population coding in neuronal systems with correlated noise.

Authors:  H Sompolinsky; H Yoon; K Kang; M Shamir
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2001-10-17

6.  Differential representation of species-specific primate vocalizations in the auditory cortices of marmoset and cat.

Authors:  X Wang; S C Kadia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Estimating spatio-temporal receptive fields of auditory and visual neurons from their responses to natural stimuli.

Authors:  F E Theunissen; S V David; N C Singh; A Hsu; W E Vinje; J L Gallant
Journal:  Network       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.273

8.  Excitatory and facilitatory frequency response areas in the inferior colliculus of the mustached bat.

Authors:  Christine V Portfors; Jeffrey J Wenstrup
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Orientation selectivity in macaque V1: diversity and laminar dependence.

Authors:  Dario L Ringach; Robert M Shapley; Michael J Hawken
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Temporal encoding of the voice onset time phonetic parameter by field potentials recorded directly from human auditory cortex.

Authors:  M Steinschneider; I O Volkov; M D Noh; P C Garell; M A Howard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  44 in total

1.  Humming in tune: sex and species recognition by mosquitoes on the wing.

Authors:  Gabriella Gibson; Ben Warren; Ian J Russell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-26

2.  Precise feature based time scales and frequency decorrelation lead to a sparse auditory code.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Heather L Read; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Emergence of invariant representation of vocalizations in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Isaac M Carruthers; Diego A Laplagne; Andrew Jaegle; John J Briguglio; Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo; Ryan G Natan; Maria N Geffen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Context-dependent modulation of auditory processing by serotonin.

Authors:  L M Hurley; I C Hall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  16p11.2 Deletion Syndrome Mice Display Sensory and Ultrasonic Vocalization Deficits During Social Interactions.

Authors:  Mu Yang; Elena J Mahrt; Freeman Lewis; Gillian Foley; Thomas Portmann; Ricardo E Dolmetsch; Christine V Portfors; Jacqueline N Crawley
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.216

6.  Subcortical input heterogeneity in the mouse inferior colliculus.

Authors:  H-Rüdiger A P Geis; Marcel van der Heijden; J Gerard G Borst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Seasonal plasticity of precise spike timing in the avian auditory system.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Kamal Sen; Edwin W Rubel; Eliot A Brenowitz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Subcortical pathways: Towards a better understanding of auditory disorders.

Authors:  Richard A Felix; Boris Gourévitch; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  The effects of aging and sex on detection of ultrasonic vocalizations by adult CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Discrimination of partial from whole ultrasonic vocalizations using a go/no-go task in mice.

Authors:  David P Holfoth; Erikson G Neilans; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.