Literature DB >> 26381885

Determining Ultrasonic Vocalization Preferences in Mice using a Two-choice Playback Test.

Akari Asaba1, Masahiro Kato2, Nobuyoshi Koshida3, Takefumi Kikusui4.   

Abstract

Mice emit ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) during a variety of conditions, such as pup isolation and adult social interactions. These USVs differ with age, sex, condition, and genetic background of the emitting animal. Although many studies have characterized these differences, whether receiver mice can discriminate among objectively different USVs and show preferences for particular sound traits remains to be elucidated. To determine whether mice can discriminate between different characteristics of USVs, a playback experiment was developed recently, in which preference responses of mice to two different USVs could be evaluated in the form of a place preference. First, USVs from mice were recorded. Then, the recorded USVs were edited, trimmed accordingly, and exported as stereophonic sound files. Next, the USV amplitudes generated by the two ultrasound emitters used in the experiment were adjusted to the same sound pressure level. Nanocrystalline silicon thermo-acoustic emitters were used to play the USVs back. Finally, to investigate the preference of subject mice to selected USVs, pairs of two differing USV signals were played back simultaneously in a two-choice test box. By repeatedly entering a defined zone near an ultrasound emitter and searching the wire mesh in front of the emitter, the mouse reveals its preference for one sound over another. This model allows comparing the attractiveness of the various features of mouse USVs, in various contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26381885      PMCID: PMC4692581          DOI: 10.3791/53074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  30 in total

1.  The male mouse pheromone ESP1 enhances female sexual receptive behaviour through a specific vomeronasal receptor.

Authors:  Sachiko Haga; Tatsuya Hattori; Toru Sato; Koji Sato; Soichiro Matsuda; Reiko Kobayakawa; Hitoshi Sakano; Yoshihiro Yoshihara; Takefumi Kikusui; Kazushige Touhara
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Pup odor and ultrasonic vocalizations synergistically stimulate maternal attention in mice.

Authors:  Shota Okabe; Miho Nagasawa; Takashi Kihara; Masahiro Kato; Toshihiro Harada; Nobuyoshi Koshida; Kazutaka Mogi; Takefumi Kikusui
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Unusual repertoire of vocalizations in adult BTBR T+tf/J mice during three types of social encounters.

Authors:  M L Scattoni; L Ricceri; J N Crawley
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.449

4.  Effect of ER-beta gene disruption on estrogenic regulation of anxiety in female mice.

Authors:  Kazuya Tomihara; Tomoko Soga; Masayoshi Nomura; Kenneth S Korach; Jan-Ake Gustafsson; Donald W Pfaff; Sonoko Ogawa
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-10-29

5.  Absence of deficits in social behaviors and ultrasonic vocalizations in later generations of mice lacking neuroligin4.

Authors:  E Ey; M Yang; T Bourgeron; J N Crawley; A M Katz; L Woldeyohannes; J L Silverman; C S Leblond; P Faure; N Torquet; A-M Le Sourd
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.449

6.  Deficit in attachment behavior in mice lacking the mu-opioid receptor gene.

Authors:  Anna Moles; Brigitte L Kieffer; Francesca R D'Amato
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A role for strain differences in waveforms of ultrasonic vocalizations during male-female interaction.

Authors:  Hiroki Sugimoto; Shota Okabe; Masahiro Kato; Nobuyoshi Koshida; Toshihiko Shiroishi; Kazutaka Mogi; Takefumi Kikusui; Tsuyoshi Koide
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Affiliative behavior, ultrasonic communication and social reward are influenced by genetic variation in adolescent mice.

Authors:  Jules B Panksepp; Kimberly A Jochman; Joseph U Kim; Jamie J Koy; Ellie D Wilson; Qiliang Chen; Clarinda R Wilson; Garet P Lahvis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Discrimination of ultrasonic vocalizations by CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus) is related to spectrotemporal dissimilarity of vocalizations.

Authors:  Erikson G Neilans; David P Holfoth; Kelly E Radziwon; Christine V Portfors; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A role for ultrasonic vocalisation in social communication and divergence of natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus).

Authors:  Sophie von Merten; Svenja Hoier; Christine Pfeifle; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Eliciting and Analyzing Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization (USV) Songs.

Authors:  Jonathan Chabout; Joshua Jones-Macopson; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  High-precision spatial localization of mouse vocalizations during social interaction.

Authors:  Jesse J Heckman; Rémi Proville; Gert J Heckman; Alireza Azarfar; Tansu Celikel; Bernhard Englitz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Emerging Functions of Nanostructured Porous Silicon-With a Focus on the Emissive Properties of Photons, Electrons, and Ultrasound.

Authors:  Nobuyoshi Koshida; Toshihiro Nakamura
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.221

4.  Investigating audible and ultrasonic noise in modern animal facilities.

Authors:  Andrew Parker; Liane Hobson; Rasneer Bains; Sara Wells; Michael Bowl
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2022-06-14

5.  Why do mice squeak? Toward a better understanding of defensive vocalization.

Authors:  Julia Ruat; Andreas J Genewsky; Daniel E Heinz; Sebastian F Kaltwasser; Newton S Canteras; Michael Czisch; Alon Chen; Carsten T Wotjak
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-22

6.  Prelimbic cortex responds to male ultrasonic vocalizations in the presence of a male pheromone in female mice.

Authors:  Akari Asaba; Kensaku Nomoto; Takuya Osakada; Tomohiko Matsuo; Ko Kobayakawa; Reiko Kobayakawa; Kazushige Touhara; Kazutaka Mogi; Takefumi Kikusui
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.342

Review 7.  Hearing, touching, and multisensory integration during mate choice.

Authors:  Constanze Lenschow; Ana Rita P Mendes; Susana Q Lima
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.342

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.