Literature DB >> 27914389

Discrimination of frequency modulated sweeps by mice.

Laurel A Screven1, Micheal L Dent1.   

Abstract

Mice often produce ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) that sweep upwards in frequency from around 60 to around 80 kHz and downwards in frequency from 80 to 60 kHz. Whether or not these USVs are used for communication purposes is still unknown. Here, mice were trained and tested using operant conditioning procedures and positive reinforcement to discriminate between synthetic upsweeps and downsweeps. The stimuli varied in bandwidth, duration, and direction of sweep. The mice performed significantly worse when discriminating between background and test stimuli when the stimuli all occupied the same bandwidths. Further, the mice's discrimination performance became much worse for stimuli that had durations similar to those natural vocalizations of the mice. Sweeps composed of different frequency ranges and longer durations had improved discrimination. These results collected using artificial stimuli created to mimic natural USVs indicate that the bandwidth of the vocalizations may be much more important for communication than the frequency contours of the vocalizations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27914389      PMCID: PMC6910002          DOI: 10.1121/1.4962223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Evoked-potential changes following discrimination learning involving complex sounds.

Authors:  Itzel Orduña; Estella H Liu; Barbara A Church; Ann C Eddins; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Types and functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory rats and mice.

Authors:  Christine V Portfors
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Discrimination of direction in fast frequency-modulated tones by rats.

Authors:  Bernhard H Gaese; Isabella King; Christian Felsheim; Joachim Ostwald; Wolfger von der Behrens
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-13

4.  Categorical discrimination of direction in frequency-modulated tones by Mongolian gerbils.

Authors:  W Wetzel; T Wagner; F W Ohl; H Scheich
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Unusual repertoire of vocalizations in adult BTBR T+tf/J mice during three types of social encounters.

Authors:  M L Scattoni; L Ricceri; J N Crawley
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.449

6.  Auditory categorization of complex sounds by rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Eduardo Mercado; Itzel Orduña; Jeaveen M Nowak
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  The mouse as a model for human audition. A review of the literature.

Authors:  K R Henry; M D McGinn
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1992

8.  Social vocalizations of big brown bats vary with behavioral context.

Authors:  Marie A Gadziola; Jasmine M S Grimsley; Paul A Faure; Jeffrey J Wenstrup
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Female mice respond to male ultrasonic 'songs' with approach behaviour.

Authors:  K Hammerschmidt; K Radyushkin; H Ehrenreich; J Fischer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Automated classification of mouse pup isolation syllables: from cluster analysis to an Excel-based "mouse pup syllable classification calculator".

Authors:  Jasmine M S Grimsley; Marie A Gadziola; Jeffrey J Wenstrup
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  7 in total

1.  The effects of age and sex on the detection of pure tones by adult CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Blast trauma affects production and perception of mouse ultrasonic vocalizations.

Authors:  Kali Burke; Kathleen A Ohman; Senthilvelan Manohar; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Capturing the songs of mice with an improved detection and classification method for ultrasonic vocalizations (BootSnap).

Authors:  Reyhaneh Abbasi; Peter Balazs; Maria Adelaide Marconi; Doris Nicolakis; Sarah M Zala; Dustin J Penn
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.779

4.  The effects of aging and sex on detection of ultrasonic vocalizations by adult CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Long term changes to auditory sensitivity following blast trauma in mice.

Authors:  Kali Burke; Senthilvelan Manohar; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Best sensitivity of temporal modulation transfer functions in laboratory mice matches the amplitude modulation embedded in vocalizations.

Authors:  Huaizhen Cai; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  The temporal organization of mouse ultrasonic vocalizations.

Authors:  Gregg A Castellucci; Daniel Calbick; David McCormick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.