Literature DB >> 23536072

Engineered deafness reveals that mouse courtship vocalizations do not require auditory experience.

Elena J Mahrt1, David J Perkel, Ling Tong, Edwin W Rubel, Christine V Portfors.   

Abstract

Auditory experience during development is necessary for normal language acquisition in humans. Although songbirds, some cetaceans, and maybe bats may also be vocal learners, vocal learning has yet to be well established for a laboratory mammal. Mice are potentially an excellent model organism for studying mechanisms underlying vocal communication. Mice vocalize in different social contexts, yet whether they learn their vocalizations remains unresolved. To address this question, we compared ultrasonic courtship vocalizations emitted by chronically deaf and normal hearing adult male mice. We deafened CBA/CaJ male mice, engineered to express diphtheria toxin (DT) receptors in hair cells, by systemic injection of DT at postnatal day 2 (P2). By P9, almost all inner hair cells were absent and by P16 all inner and outer hair cells were absent in DTR mice. These mice did not show any auditory brainstem responses as adults. Wild-type littermates, also treated with DT at P2, had normal hair cells and normal auditory brainstem responses. We compared the temporal structure of vocalization bouts, the types of vocalizations, the patterns of syllables, and the acoustic features of each syllable type emitted by hearing and deaf males in the presence of a female. We found that almost all of the vocalization features we examined were similar in hearing and deaf animals. These findings indicate that mice do not need auditory experience during development to produce normal ultrasonic vocalizations in adulthood. We conclude that mouse courtship vocalizations are not acquired through auditory feedback-dependent learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23536072      PMCID: PMC3691057          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5054-12.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  32 in total

1.  Decreased apoptosis in the brain and premature lethality in CPP32-deficient mice.

Authors:  K Kuida; T S Zheng; S Na; C Kuan; D Yang; H Karasuyama; P Rakic; R A Flavell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-11-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Birdsong and speech development: could there be parallels?

Authors:  P Marler
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  1970 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.548

3.  Vocal imitation in zebra finches is inversely related to model abundance.

Authors:  O Tchernichovski; T Lints; P P Mitra; F Nottebohm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Assessment of hearing in 80 inbred strains of mice by ABR threshold analyses.

Authors:  Q Y Zheng; K R Johnson; L C Erway
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  A humanized version of Foxp2 affects cortico-basal ganglia circuits in mice.

Authors:  Wolfgang Enard; Sabine Gehre; Kurt Hammerschmidt; Sabine M Hölter; Torsten Blass; Mehmet Somel; Martina K Brückner; Christiane Schreiweis; Christine Winter; Reinhard Sohr; Lore Becker; Victor Wiebe; Birgit Nickel; Thomas Giger; Uwe Müller; Matthias Groszer; Thure Adler; Antonio Aguilar; Ines Bolle; Julia Calzada-Wack; Claudia Dalke; Nicole Ehrhardt; Jack Favor; Helmut Fuchs; Valérie Gailus-Durner; Wolfgang Hans; Gabriele Hölzlwimmer; Anahita Javaheri; Svetoslav Kalaydjiev; Magdalena Kallnik; Eva Kling; Sandra Kunder; Ilona Mossbrugger; Beatrix Naton; Ildikó Racz; Birgit Rathkolb; Jan Rozman; Anja Schrewe; Dirk H Busch; Jochen Graw; Boris Ivandic; Martin Klingenspor; Thomas Klopstock; Markus Ollert; Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez; Holger Schulz; Eckhard Wolf; Wolfgang Wurst; Andreas Zimmer; Simon E Fisher; Rudolf Morgenstern; Thomas Arendt; Martin Hrabé de Angelis; Julia Fischer; Johannes Schwarz; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Evoked potential correlates of genetic progressive hearing loss. Age-related changes from the ear to the inferior colliculus of C57BL/6 and CBA/J mice.

Authors:  K R Henry; C M Lepkowski
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1978 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Mice do not require auditory input for the normal development of their ultrasonic vocalizations.

Authors:  Kurt Hammerschmidt; Ellen Reisinger; Katharina Westekemper; Ludwig Ehrenreich; Nicola Strenzke; Julia Fischer
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Cross fostering experiments suggest that mice songs are innate.

Authors:  Takefumi Kikusui; Kaori Nakanishi; Ryoko Nakagawa; Miho Nagasawa; Kazutaka Mogi; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Affiliative behavior, ultrasonic communication and social reward are influenced by genetic variation in adolescent mice.

Authors:  Jules B Panksepp; Kimberly A Jochman; Joseph U Kim; Jamie J Koy; Ellie D Wilson; Qiliang Chen; Clarinda R Wilson; Garet P Lahvis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Of mice, birds, and men: the mouse ultrasonic song system has some features similar to humans and song-learning birds.

Authors:  Gustavo Arriaga; Eric P Zhou; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  68 in total

1.  16p11.2 Deletion Syndrome Mice Display Sensory and Ultrasonic Vocalization Deficits During Social Interactions.

Authors:  Mu Yang; Elena J Mahrt; Freeman Lewis; Gillian Foley; Thomas Portmann; Ricardo E Dolmetsch; Christine V Portfors; Jacqueline N Crawley
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.216

2.  Insights from a nonvocal learner on social communication.

Authors:  Nancy F Day; Elizabeth R Fraley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The role of ultrasonic vocalizations in mouse communication.

Authors:  Christine V Portfors; David J Perkel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Selective deletion of cochlear hair cells causes rapid age-dependent changes in spiral ganglion and cochlear nucleus neurons.

Authors:  Ling Tong; Melissa K Strong; Tejbeer Kaur; Jose M Juiz; Elizabeth C Oesterle; Clifford Hume; Mark E Warchol; Richard D Palmiter; Edwin W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Spontaneous hair cell regeneration in the neonatal mouse cochlea in vivo.

Authors:  Brandon C Cox; Renjie Chai; Anne Lenoir; Zhiyong Liu; LingLi Zhang; Duc-Huy Nguyen; Kavita Chalasani; Katherine A Steigelman; Jie Fang; Edwin W Rubel; Alan G Cheng; Jian Zuo
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 6.  The zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata: an avian model for investigating the neurobiological basis of vocal learning.

Authors:  Claudio V Mello
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2014-10-23

7.  Vocalization deficits in mice over-expressing alpha-synuclein, a model of pre-manifest Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Laura M Grant; Franziska Richter; Julie E Miller; Stephanie A White; Cynthia M Fox; Chunni Zhu; Marie-Francoise Chesselet; Michelle R Ciucci
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Discrimination of partial from whole ultrasonic vocalizations using a go/no-go task in mice.

Authors:  David P Holfoth; Erikson G Neilans; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Sociability Deficits and Altered Amygdala Circuits in Mice Lacking Pcdh10, an Autism Associated Gene.

Authors:  Hannah Schoch; Arati S Kreibich; Sarah L Ferri; Rachel S White; Dominique Bohorquez; Anamika Banerjee; Russell G Port; Holly C Dow; Lucero Cordero; Ashley A Pallathra; Hyong Kim; Hongzhe Li; Warren B Bilker; Shinji Hirano; Robert T Schultz; Karin Borgmann-Winter; Chang-Gyu Hahn; Dirk Feldmeyer; Gregory C Carlson; Ted Abel; Edward S Brodkin
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Evidence for an audience effect in mice: male social partners alter the male vocal response to female cues.

Authors:  Kelly M Seagraves; Ben J Arthur; S E Roian Egnor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.