Literature DB >> 28518074

Eliciting and Analyzing Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization (USV) Songs.

Jonathan Chabout1, Joshua Jones-Macopson2, Erich D Jarvis3.   

Abstract

Mice produce ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in a variety of social contexts throughout development and adulthood. These USVs are used for mother-pup retrieval1, juvenile interactions2, opposite and same sex interactions3,4,5, and territorial interactions6. For decades, the USVs have been used by investigators as proxies to study neuropsychiatric and developmental or behavioral disorders7,8,9, and more recently to understand mechanisms and evolution of vocal communication among vertebrates10. Within the sexual interactions, adult male mice produce USV songs, which have some features similar to courtship songs of songbirds11. The use of such multisyllabic repertoires can increase potential flexibility and information they carry, as they can be varied in how elements are organized and recombined, namely syntax. In this protocol a reliable method to elicit USV songs from male mice in various social contexts, such as exposure to fresh female urine, anesthetized animals, and estrus females is described. This includes conditions to induce a large amount of syllables from the mice. We reduce recording of ambient noises with inexpensive sound chambers, and present a quantification method to automatically detect, classify and analyze the USVs. The latter includes evaluation of call-rate, vocal repertoire, acoustic parameters, and syntax. Various approaches and insight on using playbacks to study an animal's preference for specific song types are described. These methods were used to describe acoustic and syntax changes across different contexts in male mice, and song preferences in female mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28518074      PMCID: PMC5607930          DOI: 10.3791/54137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  35 in total

1.  The Autism ProSAP1/Shank2 mouse model displays quantitative and structural abnormalities in ultrasonic vocalisations.

Authors:  Elodie Ey; Nicolas Torquet; Anne-Marie Le Sourd; Claire S Leblond; Tobias M Boeckers; Philippe Faure; Thomas Bourgeron
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Bird song syntax: learned intraspecific variation is meaningful.

Authors:  E Balaban
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ultrasonic vocalizations emitted during dyadic interactions in female mice: a possible index of sociability?

Authors:  Anna Moles; Fabrizio Costantini; Luciana Garbugino; Claudio Zanettini; Francesca R D'Amato
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Mouse estrous cycle identification tool and images.

Authors:  Shannon L Byers; Michael V Wiles; Sadie L Dunn; Robert A Taft
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Affiliative behavior, ultrasonic communication and social reward are influenced by genetic variation in adolescent mice.

Authors:  Jules B Panksepp; Kimberly A Jochman; Joseph U Kim; Jamie J Koy; Ellie D Wilson; Qiliang Chen; Clarinda R Wilson; Garet P Lahvis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  VoICE: A semi-automated pipeline for standardizing vocal analysis across models.

Authors:  Zachary D Burkett; Nancy F Day; Olga Peñagarikano; Daniel H Geschwind; Stephanie A White
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Discrimination of ultrasonic vocalizations by CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus) is related to spectrotemporal dissimilarity of vocalizations.

Authors:  Erikson G Neilans; David P Holfoth; Kelly E Radziwon; Christine V Portfors; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Male mice song syntax depends on social contexts and influences female preferences.

Authors:  Jonathan Chabout; Abhra Sarkar; David B Dunson; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Of mice, birds, and men: the mouse ultrasonic song system has some features similar to humans and song-learning birds.

Authors:  Gustavo Arriaga; Eric P Zhou; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A role for ultrasonic vocalisation in social communication and divergence of natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus).

Authors:  Sophie von Merten; Svenja Hoier; Christine Pfeifle; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Female- and Intruder-induced Ultrasonic Vocalizations in C57BL/6J Mice as Proxy Indicators for Animal Wellbeing.

Authors:  Brian J Smith; Kate E P Bruner; Lon V Kendall
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  Deficits in ultrasonic vocalization development and production following neonatal hypoxic ischemic insult.

Authors:  Sarah J Doran; Mike Jandzinski; Anthony Patrizz; Cassandra Trammel; Romana Sharmeen; Abdullah A Mamun; Lori A Capozzi; Venugopal Reddy Venna; Fudong Liu; Louise D McCullough
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Female Urine-induced Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Male C57BL/6J Mice as a Proxy Indicator for Postoperative Pain.

Authors:  Brian J Smith; Kate E P Bruner; Ann M Hess; Lon V Kendall
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Recurrent laryngeal nerve transection in mice results in translational upper airway dysfunction.

Authors:  Megan M Haney; Ali Hamad; Henok G Woldu; Michelle Ciucci; Nicole Nichols; Filiz Bunyak; Teresa E Lever
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Capturing the songs of mice with an improved detection and classification method for ultrasonic vocalizations (BootSnap).

Authors:  Reyhaneh Abbasi; Peter Balazs; Maria Adelaide Marconi; Doris Nicolakis; Sarah M Zala; Dustin J Penn
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.779

6.  A comparison of the Avisoft (v.5.2) and MATLAB Mouse Song Analyzer (v.1.3) vocalization analysis systems in C57BL/6, Fmr1-FVB.129, NS-Pten-FVB, and 129 mice.

Authors:  Matthew Binder; Suzanne O Nolan; Joaquin N Lugo
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Prenatal environmental stressors impair postnatal microglia function and adult behavior in males.

Authors:  Carina L Block; Oznur Eroglu; Stephen D Mague; Caroline J Smith; Alexis M Ceasrine; Chaichontat Sriworarat; Cameron Blount; Kathleen A Beben; Karen E Malacon; Nkemdilim Ndubuizu; Austin Talbot; Neil M Gallagher; Young Chan Jo; Timothy Nyangacha; David E Carlson; Kafui Dzirasa; Cagla Eroglu; Staci D Bilbo
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 9.995

Review 8.  Hearing, touching, and multisensory integration during mate choice.

Authors:  Constanze Lenschow; Ana Rita P Mendes; Susana Q Lima
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.342

9.  Prenatal High-Fat Diet Rescues Communication Deficits in Fmr1 Mutant Mice in a Sex-Specific Manner.

Authors:  Suzanne O Nolan; Samantha L Hodges; James T Okoh; Matthew S Binder; Joaquin N Lugo
Journal:  Dev Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Male mice adjust courtship behavior in response to female multimodal signals.

Authors:  Kelly L Ronald; Xinzhu Zhang; Matthew V Morrison; Ryan Miller; Laura M Hurley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.