Literature DB >> 19756650

Behaviorally measured audiograms and gap detection thresholds in CBA/CaJ mice.

Kelly E Radziwon1, Kristie M June, Daniel J Stolzberg, Matthew A Xu-Friedman, Richard J Salvi, Micheal L Dent.   

Abstract

Tone detection and temporal gap detection thresholds were determined in CBA/CaJ mice using a Go/No-go procedure and the psychophysical method of constant stimuli. In the first experiment, audiograms were constructed for five CBA/CaJ mice. Thresholds were obtained for eight pure tones ranging in frequency from 1 to 42 kHz. Audiograms showed peak sensitivity between 8 and 24 kHz, with higher thresholds at lower and higher frequencies. In the second experiment, thresholds for gap detection in broadband and narrowband noise bursts were measured at several sensation levels. For broadband noise, gap thresholds were between 1 and 2 ms, except at very low sensation levels, where thresholds increased significantly. Gap thresholds also increased significantly for low pass-filtered noise bursts with a cutoff frequency below 18 kHz. Our experiments revised absolute auditory thresholds in the CBA/CaJ mouse strain and demonstrated excellent gap detection ability in the mouse. These results add to the baseline behavioral data from normal-hearing mice which have become increasingly important for assessing auditory abilities in genetically altered mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19756650      PMCID: PMC2813807          DOI: 10.1007/s00359-009-0472-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  28 in total

1.  Behavioral assessments of auditory sensitivity in transgenic mice.

Authors:  C A Prosen; K G Bath; D E Vetter; B J May
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Using signal detection methods for analysis of operant performance in mice.

Authors:  T Steckler
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Age-related loss of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in four mouse strains.

Authors:  A M Jimenez; B B Stagner; G K Martin; B L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Behavioral and neural measures of auditory temporal acuity in aging humans and mice.

Authors:  Kathy Barsz; James R Ison; Karen B Snell; Joseph P Walton
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Gap detection in Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus).

Authors:  Eva Wagner; Georg M Klump; Ingo Hamann
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Gap detection threshold in the rat before and after auditory cortex ablation.

Authors:  J Syka; N Rybalko; J Mazelová; R Druga
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The functional age of hearing loss in a mouse model of presbycusis. I. Behavioral assessments.

Authors:  Cynthia A Prosen; Dawn J Dore; Bradford J May
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The relative detectability for mice of gaps having different ramp durations at their onset and offset boundaries.

Authors:  James R Ison; Jason Castro; Paul Allen; Tracy M Virag; Joseph P Walton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Impaired gap encoding in aged mouse inferior colliculus at moderate but not high stimulus levels.

Authors:  Paul D Allen; Robert F Burkard; James R Ison; Joseph P Walton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Humans detect gaps in broadband noise according to effective gap duration without additional cues from abrupt envelope changes.

Authors:  Paul D Allen; Tracy M Virag; James R Ison
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  44 in total

1.  Is noise-induced cochlear neuropathy key to the generation of hyperacusis or tinnitus?

Authors:  Ann E Hickox; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.

Authors:  Livia de Hoz; Israel Nelken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Perineuronal nets in subcortical auditory nuclei of four rodent species with differing hearing ranges.

Authors:  Nichole L Beebe; Brett R Schofield
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Audiograms, gap detection thresholds, and frequency difference limens in cannabinoid receptor 1 knockout mice.

Authors:  Katrina L Toal; Kelly E Radziwon; David P Holfoth; Matthew A Xu-Friedman; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Frequency difference limens and auditory cue trading in CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Kelly E Radziwon; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  The effects of aging and sex on detection of ultrasonic vocalizations by adult CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Discrimination of partial from whole ultrasonic vocalizations using a go/no-go task in mice.

Authors:  David P Holfoth; Erikson G Neilans; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Linking anatomical and physiological markers of auditory system degeneration with behavioral hearing assessments in a mouse (Mus musculus) model of age-related hearing loss.

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Katrina M Schrode; Laurel A Screven; Hamad Javaid; Madison M Weinberg; Garrett Brown; Ryleigh Board; Dillan F Villavisanis; Micheal L Dent; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex vs. auditory brainstem response for hearing assessment.

Authors:  R J Longenecker; F Alghamdi; M J Rosen; A V Galazyuk
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Rapid measurement of auditory filter shape in mice using the auditory brainstem response and notched noise.

Authors:  Ioan A Lina; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.