Literature DB >> 25480066

Re-examining the upper limit of temporal pitch.

Olivier Macherey1, Robert P Carlyon1.   

Abstract

Five normally hearing listeners pitch-ranked harmonic complexes of different fundamental frequencies (F0s) filtered in three different frequency regions. Harmonics were summed either in sine, alternating sine-cosine (ALT), or pulse-spreading (PSHC) phase. The envelopes of ALT and PSHC complexes repeated at rates of 2F0 and 4F0. Pitch corresponded to those rates at low F0s, but, as F0 increased, there was a range of F0s over which pitch remained constant or dropped. Gammatone-filterbank simulations showed that, as F0 increased and the number of harmonics interacting in a filter dropped, the output of that filter switched from repeating at 2F0 or 4F0 to repeating at F0. A model incorporating this phenomenon accounted well for the data, except for complexes filtered into the highest frequency region (7800-10 800 Hz). To account for the data in that region it was necessary to assume either that auditory filters at very high frequencies are sharper than traditionally believed, and/or that the auditory system applies smaller weights to filters whose outputs repeat at high rates. The results also provide evidence on the highest pitch that can be derived from purely temporal cues, and corroborate recent reports that a complex pitch can be derived from very-high-frequency resolved harmonics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25480066      PMCID: PMC4340596          DOI: 10.1121/1.4900917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  The lower limit of melodic pitch.

Authors:  D Pressnitzer; R D Patterson; K Krumbholz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

3.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory filter shapes at 8 and 10 kHz.

Authors:  M J Shailer; B C Moore; B R Glasberg; N Watson; S Harris
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory filter shapes at high frequencies.

Authors:  B Zhou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Optimizing pulse-spreading harmonic complexes to minimize intrinsic modulations after auditory filtering.

Authors:  Gaston Hilkhuysen; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  B Townshend; N Cotter; D Van Compernolle; R L White
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Intonation of musical intervals by musical intervals by deaf subjects stimulated with single bipolar cochlear implant electrodes.

Authors:  S Pijl; D W Schwarz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Selective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve activates a pathway specialized for high temporal acuity.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Russell L Snyder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Discrimination of the fundamental frequency of complex tones with fixed and shifting spectral envelopes by normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Geoffrey A Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  17 in total

1.  Spectro-temporal templates unify the pitch percepts of resolved and unresolved harmonics.

Authors:  Shihab Shamma; Kelsey Dutta
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of Aging on Perceptual and Electrophysiological Responses to Acoustic Pulse Trains as a Function of Rate.

Authors:  Casey Gaskins; Brittany N Jaekel; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Superoptimal Perceptual Integration Suggests a Place-Based Representation of Pitch at High Frequencies.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Juliana Mathews; Lixue Dong
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effect of Pulse Polarity on Thresholds and on Non-monotonic Loudness Growth in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon; Jacques Chatron; Stéphane Roman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-30

6.  Effects of aging and hearing loss on perceptual and electrophysiological measures of pulse-rate discrimination.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Samira Anderson; Matthew J Goupell; Ed Smith; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Susan R S Bissmeyer; Andres Camarena
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-03

8.  Pitch of harmonic complex tones: rate and temporal coding of envelope repetition rate in inferior colliculus of unanesthetized rabbits.

Authors:  Yaqing Su; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  On Zwicker tones and musical pitch in the likely absence of phase locking corresponding to the pitch.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  On musical interval perception for complex tones at very high frequencies.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.