Literature DB >> 33940917

On musical interval perception for complex tones at very high frequencies.

Hedwig E Gockel1, Robert P Carlyon1.   

Abstract

Listeners appear able to extract a residue pitch from high-frequency harmonics for which phase locking to the temporal fine structure is weak or absent. The present study investigated musical interval perception for high-frequency harmonic complex tones using the same stimuli as Lau, Mehta, and Oxenham [J. Neurosci. 37, 9013-9021 (2017)]. Nine young musically trained listeners with especially good high-frequency hearing adjusted various musical intervals using harmonic complex tones containing harmonics 6-10. The reference notes had fundamental frequencies (F0s) of 280 or 1400 Hz. Interval matches were possible, albeit markedly worse, even when all harmonic frequencies were above the presumed limit of phase locking. Matches showed significantly larger systematic errors and higher variability, and subjects required more trials to finish a match for the high than for the low F0. Additional absolute pitch judgments from one subject with absolute pitch, for complex tones containing harmonics 1-5 or 6-10 with a wide range of F0s, were perfect when the lowest frequency component was below about 7 kHz, but at least 50% of responses were incorrect when it was 8 kHz or higher. The results are discussed in terms of the possible effects of phase-locking information and familiarity with high-frequency stimuli on pitch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33940917      PMCID: PMC7612123          DOI: 10.1121/10.0004222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  35 in total

1.  A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.

Authors:  B C Moore; M Huss; D A Vickers; B R Glasberg; J I Alcántara
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2000-08

2.  A spectral network model of pitch perception.

Authors:  M A Cohen; S Grossberg; L L Wyse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cancellation model of pitch perception.

Authors:  A de Cheveigné
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch.

Authors:  P A Cariani; B Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Pitch, consonance, and harmony.

Authors:  E Terhardt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones.

Authors:  J L Goldstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Pitch perception at very high frequencies: On psychometric functions and integration of frequency information.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Brian C J Moore; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  The upper frequency limit for the use of phase locking to code temporal fine structure in humans: A compilation of viewpoints.

Authors:  Eric Verschooten; Shihab Shamma; Andrew J Oxenham; Brian C J Moore; Philip X Joris; Michael G Heinz; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Universal and Non-universal Features of Musical Pitch Perception Revealed by Singing.

Authors:  Nori Jacoby; Eduardo A Undurraga; Malinda J McPherson; Joaquín Valdés; Tomás Ossandón; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 10.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.