| Literature DB >> 25472835 |
Muhammad Ayaz1, Muhammad Junaid, Fazal Subhan, Farhat Ullah, Abdul Sadiq, Sajjad Ahmad, Muhammad Imran, Zul Kamal, Sajid Hussain, Syed Majid Shah.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polygonum hydropiper L decoctions are traditionally used in the treatment of various ailments including inflammation, dyspepsia, diarrhea, menorrhagia, hemorrhoids, helminthiasis and CNS disorders. Present study was undertaken to investigate P. hydropiper L. for heavy metals content, phytoconstituents, Phytotoxic and anthelmintic activities to explore its toxicological and pharmacological potentials and rationalize its ethnomedicinal uses.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25472835 PMCID: PMC4289404 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Metal contents (ppm) in crude powder, soil and different fractions of
| Sample | Cu | Fe | Cr | Zn | Ni | Cd | Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude Powder | 7.21 ± 0.23 | 95.00 ± 0.55 | 1.51 ± 0.45 | 7 ± 0.06 | 0.199 ± 0.001 | 0.35 ± 0.154 | Nd |
| Ph.Cr | 41.16 ± 0.06 | 10.89 ± 0.001 | 243.12 ± 0.31 | Nd | Nd | 22.85 ± 0.05 | 79.37 ± 1.47 |
| Ph.Hex | 45.96 ± 0.07 | 76.15 ± 0.27 | Nd | 4.32 ± 0.009 | 11.45 ± 0.02 | 20.28 ± 0.02 | 67.30 ± 0.31 |
| Ph.Chf | 134.70 ± 0.15 | 155.88 ± 0.21 | Nd | Nd | 7.05 ± 0.01 | 16.02 ± 0.11 | 55.44 ± 2.03 |
| Ph.EtAc | 25.60 ± 0.25 | 26.55 ± 0.09 | Nd | Nd | 9.56 ± 0.08 | 9.55 ± 0.02 | Nd |
| Ph.Bt | 51.40 ± 0.03 | 135 ± 0.70 | Nd | 28.28 ± 0.01 | Nd | 37.1 ± 0.013 | 70.3 ± 1.57 |
| Ph.Aq | 34.60 ± 0.05 | 124.65 ± 0.04 | Nd | 139.92 ± 0.002 | Nd | 23.18 ± 0.02 | Nd |
| Soil | 125.30 ± 0.50 | 113 ± 1.54 | 76.95 ± 0.59 | 89.34 ± 0.46 | 19 ± 1.25 | 55.23 ± 1.05 | 90.15 ± 0.56 |
Cu: copper; Fe: iron; Cr: chromium; Zn: zinc; Pb: lead; Ni: nickel Cd: cadmium; Pb: lead.
Nd: Not detected/ below detectable concentrations.
Phytochemical constituents in crude extract of
| S. no | Phytochemical class | Test performed | Observations | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Alkaloids | Dragendorff’s Test | Turbidity/precipitation |
|
|
| Flavonoids | Ferric chloride test | Formation of yellow color which changed to colorless on acid addition |
|
|
| Saponins | Froth Test | 1. Stable froth formation |
|
| 2. Emulsion formation after olive oil |
| |||
|
| Tannins | Gelatin Test | appearance of white precipitate |
|
|
| Steroids | Liebermann Burchard test | green to pink color was absent |
|
|
| Glycosides | Keller Killiani | Lower reddish brown layer & upper acetic acid layer which turns bluish green |
|
|
| Anthraquinones | Bontrager’s test | Formation of red, violet or pink color f in aqueous layer |
|
|
| Triterpenoids | Liebermann Burchard test | Appearance of reddish brown-deep red color |
|
+; Phytoconstituent present -; Phytoconstituent Absent.
Phytotoxic effect of the crude extract, subsequent fractions and crude saponins of against radish seeds
| Samples | Conc. mg/ml | Average root length (mm) mean ± SEM | Average no of seeds inhibited mean ± SEM | Root length inhibition % mean ± SEM | IC 50 μg/ml | Seeds inhibition % mean ± SEM | IC 50 μg/ml |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1000 | 5.13 ± 0.20 | 17.00 ± 0.58 | 82.38 ± 0.68*** | 16 | 68.00 ± 2.8*** | 310 |
| 500 | 6.87 ± 0.26 | 14.66 ± 0.89 | 76.41 ± 0.89*** | 58.64 ± 3.5*** | |||
| 250 | 8.23 ± 0.20 | 11.33 ± 0.89 | 71.74 ± 0.68*** | 45.32 ± 2.8*** | |||
|
| 1000 | 5.33 ± 0.49 | 19.33 ± 0.33 | 82.70 ± 1.6*** | 77.32 ± 1.3*** | ||
| 500 | 5.03 ± 0.23 | 17.33 ± 0.67 | 81.73 ± 0.78*** | 124 | 69.32 ± 2.7*** | 215 | |
| 250 | 12.03 ± 0.48 | 12.33 ± 0.67 | 58.70 ± 1.60*** | 49.32 ± 2.7*** | |||
|
| 1000 | 3.9 ± 0.52 | 21.67 ± 0.89 | 86.61 ± 1.70*** | 86.68 ± 3.5*** | ||
| 500 | 8.4 ± 0.33 | 19.00 ± 1.15 | 71.16 ± 1.10*** | 145 | 76.00 ± 4.6*** | 35 | |
| 250 | 11.3 ± 0.43 | 18.00 ± 0.00 | 61.20 ± 1.40*** | 72.00 ± 0.0*** | |||
|
| 1000 | 2.23 ± 0.40 | 22.33 ± 1.20 | 92.34 ± 1.30ns | 89.32 ± 4.8*** | ||
| 500 | 4.9 ± 0.43 | 21.66 ± 1.20 | 83.17 ± 1.40*** | 11 | 85.32 ± 4.8 ns | 50 | |
| 250 | 5.9 ± 0.20 | 17.67 ± 0.89 | 79.74 ± 0.68* | 70.68 ± 3.5*** | |||
|
| 1000 | 4.0 ± 0.37 | 21.33 ± 0.89 | 86.26 ± 1.25*** | 85.32 ± 3.5*** | ||
| 500 | 5.93 ± 0.49 | 18.00 ± 0.58 | 79.64 ± 1.60*** | 8 | 72.00 ± 0.0*** | 100 | |
| 250 | 7.03 ± 0.23 | 16.00 ± 0.00 | 75.86 ± 0.78*** | 64.00 ± 0.0*** | |||
|
| 1000 | 6.2 ± 0.23 | 18.33 ± 0.89 | 78.71 ± 0.78*** | 73.32 ± 3.5*** | ||
| 500 | 8.8 ± 0.37 | 12.67 ± 0.89 | 69.79 ± 1.20*** | 170 | 50.68 ± 3.5*** | 485 | |
| 250 | 12.9 ± 0.48 | 07.00 ± 1.15 | 55.71 ± 1.60*** | 28.00 ± 4.6*** | |||
|
| 1000 | 5.00 ± 0.50 | 22. 00 ± 1.10 | 91.90 ± 0.75 ns | 89.25 ± 2.2*** | ||
| 500 | 7.25 ± 0.20 | 19.00 ± 1.50 | 82.10 ± 1.50*** | 10 | 77.25 ± 1.0*** | 60 | |
| 250 | 8.50 ± 0.58 | 17.00 ± 0.89 | 79.74 ± 0.68* | 70.68 ± 1.5*** | |||
|
| 1000 | 1.93 ± 0.49 | 24.67 ± 0.89 | 93.64 ± 1.60 | 98.61 ± 1.70 | ||
| 500 | 3.03 ± 0.23 | 22.16 ± 1.10 | 89.20 ± 1.40 | 0.89 | 88.22 ± 0.23 | 0.89 | |
| 250 | 5.71 ± 0.78 | 21.90 ± 0.52 | 83.33 ± 1.20 | 87.93 ± 0.49 | |||
|
| ——— | 29.13 ± 0.37 | ——— | —— | —— | —— | —— |
Standard drug (P. Control) Paraquat IC50 = 0.89 μg/ml. Results expressed as average seeds inhibition, % inhibition and Inhibition of root length (mean ± SEM n = 3) and IC50. Values significantly different as compare to Standard drug; *P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001.
Figure 1Anthelmintic activity of Ph.Cr, subsequent fractions and Ph.Sp of against (a: Paralysis time b: Death time in minutes).
Figure 2Anthelmintic activity Ph.Cr, subsequent fractions and Ph.Sp of against (a: Paralysis time b: Death time in minutes).