| Literature DB >> 35698643 |
Wasim Akhtar1, Ghazanfar Ali2, Nadia Ashraf2, Iram Fatima3, Waqas Khan Kayani4, Hamayun Shaheen1, Mohammed M Ghoneim5,6, Mohamed A Abdelgawad7, Ahmed Khames8.
Abstract
Background: Different parts of Taraxacum officinale (L.) were used in traditional medicine in various parts of the world for the treatment of health problems, and they possess significant biological activities. The present study aimed to estimate phytochemical and biological activities of T. officinale using different extraction solvents.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35698643 PMCID: PMC9188473 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5118553
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Qualitative phytochemical analysis of different extracts of T. officinale.
| Phytochemicals | Methanolic extract | Acetone extract | n-Hexane extract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids | ++ | + | + |
| Flavonoids | +++ | ++ | ++ |
| Phenols | +++ | ++ | ++ |
| Terpenoids | ++ | ++ | + |
| Steroids | ++ | + | + |
| Saponins | ++ | + | − |
| Tannins | +++ | + | − |
| Anthocyanins | +++ | ++ | + |
| Coumarins | +++ | ++ | + |
| Glycosides | ++ | − | + |
Note. +++: abundantly present; ++: moderately present; +: weakly present; −: absent.
Figure 1Total phenolic and flavonoid content detected in different extracts of T. officinale. The number represents mean ± SD (3n), and each letter (A and B) shows a significant difference at p < 0.05 as determined by LSD using Statistix 8.1.
Figure 2Antioxidant activity observed in T. officinale using different extraction solvents. The number represents mean ± SD (3n) and each letter (A–C) shows a significant difference at p < 0.05 as determined by LSD. (a) DPPH activity of the selected extracts measured at different concentrations. (b) Total reducing power (TRP) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of the selected plant extracts.
Figure 3Pearson correlation analysis and the heat map of TPC, TFC, and three antioxidant assays as detected in different plant extracts. (a) Correlation between the DPPH assay and phytochemicals. (b) Correlation between TRP and phytochemicals. (c) Correlation between TAC and phytochemicals. (d) The heat map showing the comparison of antioxidant assays and phytochemicals among different extracts by displaying the highest (red) to lowest (green) activity in colors.
Percentage mortality and LC50 values observed in different extracts using the brine shrimp cytotoxic assay.
| Plant extracts | Mortality (%) in probits at different doses | Slope | Intercept | R square | LC50 | 95% CI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 12 | 25 | 50 | 100 | ||||||
| Methanolic extract | 5.00 | 5.25 | 5.52 | 6.28 | — | 1.334 | 3.863 | 0.917 | 7.122 | 3.642–13.926 |
| Acetone extract | 4.75 | 5.00 | 5.52 | 5.84 | — | 1.238 | 3.745 | 0.986 | 10.32 | 5.243–20.336 |
| n-Hexane extract | 4.48 | 5.00 | 5.25 | 5.84 | 5.84 | 1.167 | 3.660 | 0.942 | 14.12 | 7.066–28.238 |
| Vincristine sulphate | 5.00 | 5.52 | 5.52 | 5.84 | — | 0.816 | 4.462 | 0.867 | 4.608 | 1.677–12.662 |
LC50 : lethal concentration 50%; CI : confidence interval.
Figure 4Phytotoxic potential of different extracts of T. officinale. The number represents mean ± SD (3n), and each letter (A–C) shows a significant difference at p < 0.05 as determined by LSD. (a) Root length inhibition. (b) Seed germination inhibition.